Skip to main content

Eliciting Affordances for Smart Objects in IoT Era

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Abstract

In this paper we suggest a design research method for eliciting affordances and new meanings for Smart Objects in the Internet of Things Era. After an introduction to the topic and the description of some open issues, we propose to adopt a Critical Design approach, where the role of Ambiguity is twofold: on the one hand, it is the objective of the observation for defining a set of ambiguous objects or affordances; on the other hand, it is the result of a design conceptualization of smart objects aiming at provoking cognitive dissonance and finalized to understand people adaptation processes and behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Weiser, M.: The computer for the 21st century. Sci. Am. 265(3), 94–104 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Weiser, M., Gold, R., Brown, J.S.: The origins of ubiquitous computing research at PARC in the late 1980s. IBM syst. J. 38(4), 693–696 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bleecker, J.: A manifesto for networked objects—cohabiting with pigeons, arphids and aibos in the Internet of things (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. McEwen, A., Cassimally, H.: Designing the Internet of Things. Wiley, Chichester (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gibson, J.J.: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Psychology Press, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Norman, D.: The Design of Everyday Things. Doubleday, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Norman, D.: Affordances. Conv. Des. Interact. 6(3), 38–42 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gaver, W., Beaver, J., Benford, S.: Ambiguity as a resource for design. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. 233. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Oshikawa, S.: The theory of cognitive dissonance and experimental research. J. Mark. Res. 5(4), 429–430 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dourish, P.: Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction. MIT press, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dunne, A., Raby, F.: Critical Design FAQ (2007). Accessed on 1 September 2012

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S., Stolterman, E.: Reading critical designs: supporting reasoned interpretations of critical design. In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1951–1960, April 2014

    Google Scholar 

  13. Blomberg, J., Giacomi, J., Mosher, A., Swenton-Wall, P.: Ethnographic field methods and their relation to design. In: Dchuler, D., Namioka, A. (eds.) Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Erlbaum, New Jersey (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Draycott, S., Dabbs, A.: Cognitive dissonance 1: an overview of the literature and its integration into theory and practice in clinical psychology. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 37(3), 341–353 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nowacka, D., Kirk, D.: Tangible autonomous interfaces (tais): exploring autonomous behaviors in this. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction, pp. 1–8. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zimmermann, S., Rümelin, S., Butz, A.: I feel it in my fingers: haptic guidance on touch surfaces. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction, pp. 9–12. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gross, S., Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S.: Skeu the evolution: skeuomorphs, style, and the material of tangible interactions. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction, pp. 53–60. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bowen, S., Petrelli, D.: Remembering today tomorrow: exploring the human-centered design of digital mementos. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 69(5), 324–337 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Assunta Matassa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Cite this paper

Matassa, A., Simeoni, R. (2015). Eliciting Affordances for Smart Objects in IoT Era. In: Giaffreda, R., et al. Internet of Things. User-Centric IoT. IoT360 2014. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 150. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19656-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19656-5_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19655-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19656-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics