Skip to main content

Supporting Students’ Interactions over Case Studies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 6005 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9112))

Abstract

Having students analyze case studies is one of the common tutoring strategies for ill-defined domains. This paper presents a system, Umka, that supports learners as they form arguments about case studies in a professional ethics class. The system creates visualizations of the differences between students’ case positions, and suggests to students certain peers to interact with who might help to provide deeper and broader insight. The system has been run in several iterations. Experiments with the latest version confirm the benefits of the approach in stimulating productive interactions among students, and causing students to reconsider and broaden their initial positions on a case study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Goldin, I., Ashley, K., Pinkus, R.: Introducing PETE:computer support for teaching ethics. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 94–98. ACM (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Guo, W., Diab, M.: Modeling sentences in the latent space. In: Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 864–872. Association for Computational Linguistics (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hodhod, R., Kudenko, D., Cairns, P.: AEINS: Adaptive educational interactive narrative system to teach ethics. In: Proceedings of the AIED 2009 Workshop on Intelligent Educational Games, p. 79 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kohlberg, L.: Resolving, moral conflicts within the just community. In: Moral dilemmas: philosophical and psychological issues in the development of moral reasoning. Transaction Publishers (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nucci, L.: Synthesis of research on moral development. Educational Leadership 44(5), 86–92 (1987)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Palincsar, A.: Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology 49, 345–375 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sharipova, M.: Supporting students in the analysis of case studies for professional ethics education. Ph.D. thesis, University of Saskatchewan (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mayya Sharipova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sharipova, M., McCalla, G. (2015). Supporting Students’ Interactions over Case Studies. In: Conati, C., Heffernan, N., Mitrovic, A., Verdejo, M. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9112. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_113

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_113

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19772-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19773-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics