Abstract
Mind wandering (zoning out) can be detrimental to learning outcomes in a host of educational activities, from reading to watching video lectures, yet it has received little attention in the field of intelligent tutoring systems (ITS). In the current study, participants self-reported mind wandering during a learning session with Guru, a dialogue-based ITS for biology. On average, participants interacted with Guru for 22 minutes and reported an average of 11.5 instances of mind wandering, or one instance every two minutes. The frequency of mind wandering was compared across five different phases of Guru (Common-Ground-Building Instruction, Intermittent Summary, Concept Map, Scaffolded Dialogue, and Cloze task), each requiring different learning strategies. The rate of mind wandering per minute was highest during the Common-Ground-Building Instruction and Scaffolded Dialogue phases of Guru. Importantly, there was significant negative correlation between mind wandering and learning, highlighting the need to address this phenomena during learning with ITSs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Risko, E.F., Anderson, N., Sarwal, A., Engelhardt, M., Kingstone, A.: Everyday attention: variation in mind wandering and memory in a lecture. Applied Cognitive Psychology 26, 234–242 (2012)
Baker, R.S.J.: Modeling and understanding students’ off-task behavior in intelligent tutoring systems. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 1059–1068 (2007)
Calvo, R.A., D’Mello, S.: Affect detection: An interdisciplinary review of models, methods, and their applications. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 1, 18–37 (2010)
Forbes-Riley, K., Litman, D.: When Does Disengagement Correlate with Performance in Spoken Dialog Computer Tutoring? International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 22, 39–58 (2013)
Baker, R.S.J., D’Mello, S.K., Rodrigo, M.M.T., Graesser, A.C.: Better to be frustrated than bored: The incidence, persistence, and impact of learners’ cognitive–affective states during interactions with three different computer-based learning environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68, 223–241 (2010)
Smallwood, J., Schooler, J.W.: The restless mind. Psychological bulletin 132, 946 (2006)
Beck, J.E.: Using response times to model student disengagement. In: Proceedings of the ITS2004 Workshop on Social and Emotional Intelligence in Learning Environments, pp. 13–20 (2004)
Drummond, J., Litman, D.: In the zone: towards detecting student zoning out using supervised machine learning. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds.) ITS 2010, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6095, pp. 306–308. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Smallwood, J., Fishman, D.J., Schooler, J.W.: Counting the cost of an absent mind: Mind wandering as an underrecognized influence on educational performance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 14, 230–236 (2007)
Szpunar, K.K., Moulton, S.T., Schacter, D.L.: Mind wandering and education: from the classroom to online learning. Frontiers in psychology 4 (2013)
Chi, M.: Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science 1, 73–105 (2009)
Chi, M., Wylie, R.: The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes. Educational Psychologist. 49, 219–243 (2014)
Olney, A., D’Mello, S., Risko, E.F., Graesser, A.C.: Attention in educational contexts: the role of the learning task in guiding attention. In: Fawcett, J., Risko, E.F., Kingstone, A. (eds.) The Handbook of Attention. MI Press, Cambridge, MA, (in press)
Kane, M.J., Brown, L.H., McVay, J.C., Silvia, P.J., Myin-Germeys, I., Kwapil, T.R.: For whom the mind wanders, and when an experience-sampling study of working memory and executive control in daily life. Psychological science. 18, 614–621 (2007)
Moss, J., Schunn, C.D., Schneider, W., McNamara, D.S.: The nature of mind wandering during reading varies with the cognitive control demands of the reading strategy. Brain research. 1539, 48–60 (2013)
Sousa, T.L.V., Carriere, J.S., Smilek, D.: The way we encounter reading material influences how frequently we mind wander. Frontiers in psychology 4 (2013)
Young, M.S., Robinson, S., Alberts, P.: Students pay attention! Combating the vigilance decrement to improve learning during lectures. Active Learning in Higher Education. 10, 41–55 (2009)
Lindquist, S.I., McLean, J.P.: Daydreaming and its correlates in an educational environment. Learning and Individual Differences. 21, 158–167 (2011)
Grodsky, A., Giambra, L.M.: The consistency across vigilance and reading tasks of individual differences in the occurrence of task-unrelated and task-related images and thoughts. Imagination, Cognition and Personality. 10, 39–52 (1990)
Olney, A., Person, N.K., Graesser, A.C.: Guru: designing a conversational expert intelligent tutoring system. Cross-Disciplinary Advances in Applied Natural Language Processing: Issues and Approaches, pp. 156–171 (2012)
Olney, A.M., D’Mello, S., Person, N., Cade, W., Hays, P., Williams, C., Lehman, B., Graesser, A.: Guru: a computer tutor that models expert human tutors. In: Cerri, S.A., Clancey, W.J., Papadourakis, G., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7315, pp. 256–261. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Feng, S., D’Mello, S., Graesser, A.C.: Mind wandering while reading easy and difficult texts. Psychonomic bulletin & review 1–7 (2013)
Smallwood, J.: Mind-wandering while reading: Attentional decoupling, mindless reading and the cascade model of inattention. Language and Linguistics Compass 5, 63–77 (2011)
Thomson, D.R., Seli, P., Besner, D., Smilek, D.: On the link between mind wandering and task performance over time. Consciousness and cognition. 27, 14–26 (2014)
Bixler, R., D’Mello, S.: Toward fully automated person-independent detection of mind wandering. In: Dimitrova, V., Kuflik, T., Chin, D., Ricci, F., Dolog, P., Houben, G.-J. (eds.) UMAP 2014. LNCS, vol. 8538, pp. 37–48. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
Blanchard, N., Bixler, R., Joyce, T., D’Mello, S.: Automated physiological-based detection of mind wandering during learning. In: Trausan-Matu, S., Boyer, K.E., Crosby, M., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8474, pp. 55–60. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mills, C., D’Mello, S., Bosch, N., Olney, A.M. (2015). Mind Wandering During Learning with an Intelligent Tutoring System. In: Conati, C., Heffernan, N., Mitrovic, A., Verdejo, M. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9112. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19772-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19773-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)