Skip to main content

When Is It Helpful to Restate Student Responses Within a Tutorial Dialogue System?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9112))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Tutorial dialogue systems often simulate tactics used by experienced human tutors such as restating students’ dialogue input. We investigated whether the amount of tutor restatement that supports student inference interacts with students’ incoming knowledge level in predicting how much students learn from a system. We found that students with lower incoming knowledge benefit more from an increased level of these types of restatement while students with higher incoming knowledge benefit more from a decreased level of such restatements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albacete, P., Jordan, P., Katz, S.: Is a dialogue-based tutoring system that emulates helpful co-constructed relations during human tutoring effective? In: 17th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education AIED (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Becker, L., Ward, W., Vuuren, S.V., Palmer, M.: Discuss: a dialogue move taxonomy layered over semantic representations. In: The 9th International Conference on Computational Semantics IWCS 2011 Oxford, England, January 2011

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chi, M.T.H., Roy, M.: How adaptive is an expert human tutor? In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds.) ITS 2010, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6094, pp. 401–412. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Dzikovska, M., Campbell, G., Callaway, C., Steinhauser, N., Farrow, E., Moore, J., Butler, L., Matheson, C.: Diagnosing natural language answers to support adaptive tutoring. In: International FLAIRS Conference (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Freedman, R.: Using a reactive planner as the basis for a dialogue agent. In: International FLAIRS Conference (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hyland, K.: Applying a gloss: Exemplifying and reformulating in academic discourse. Applied Linguistics 28(2), 266–285 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P.: The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychology 38, 23–31 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McNamara, D., Kintsch, E., Songer, N., Kintsch, W.: Are good texts always better? text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction 14, 1–43 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Person, N., Graesser, A., Kreuz, R., Pomeroy, V.: Simulating human tutor dialog moves in autotutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 12, 23–39 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pamela Jordan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jordan, P., Albacete, P., Katz, S. (2015). When Is It Helpful to Restate Student Responses Within a Tutorial Dialogue System?. In: Conati, C., Heffernan, N., Mitrovic, A., Verdejo, M. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9112. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_85

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_85

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19772-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19773-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics