Skip to main content

Strengthening the Rationale of Recommendations Through a Hybrid Explanations Building Framework

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Decision Technologies (IDT 2017)

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 39))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1488 Accesses

Abstract

In recommender systems research, there is growing awareness of the need to make the recommendation process more transparent and persuasive. This can be achieved by providing users with explanatory information about the recommended items. In this way, recommendation generating algorithms do not act like black boxes, but provide a rationale for each recommendation. In this paper, we briefly discuss and comment on existing approaches, and propose a novel framework for explanations building in recommender systems. The proposed framework builds explanations by following a hybrid approach that incorporates collaborative filtering and sentiment analysis features into classical multi-attribute based ranking. The enhanced trustworthiness of the explanation patterns produced by our approach is demonstrated through a series of illustrative examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. McNee, S., Riedl, J., Konstan, J.: Being accurate is not enough: how accuracy metrics have hurt recommender systems. In: Proceedings of CHI ’06, pp. 1097–1101. ACM, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Herlocker, L., Konstan, J., Riedl, J.: Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’00), pp. 241–250. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tintarev, N., Masthoff, J.: Effective explanations of recommendations: user-centered design. In: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys’07), pp. 153–156. ACM, MN, Minneapolis, USA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gunes, I., Kaleli, C., Bilge, A., Polat, H.: Shilling attacks against recommender systems: a comprehensive survey. Artif. Intell. Rev. 42(4), 767–799 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tintarev, N., Masthoff, J.: Designing and evaluating explanations for recommender systems. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B., Kantor, P.B. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 479–510. Springer, Berlin (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Czarkowski, A.: Scrutable Adaptive Hypertext. Ph.D. thesis, University of Sydney (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cosley, D., Lam, S., Albert, I., Konstan, J., Riedl, J.: Is seeing believing? how recommender interfaces affect users’ opinions. In: Proceedings of CHI 2003, pp. 585–592. ACM, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Darlington, K.: Aspects of intelligent systems explanation. Univers. J. Control Autom. 1, 40–51 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nunes, I., Miles, S., Luck, M.: Investigating explanations to justify choice. In: Masthoff, J., Mobasher, B., Desmarais, M., Nkambou, R. (eds.) UMAP 2012. LNCS, vol. 7379, pp. 212–224. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Figuera, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (eds.): Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Springer, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Burke, R.: A case-based approach to collaborative filtering. In: Proceedings of the Fifth European Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning, vol. 1898. Springer, LNAI (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pang, B., Lee, L.: Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Found. Trends Inf. Retrieval 2(1–2), 1–135 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nunes, I., Miles, S., Luck, M., Barbosa, S., Lucena, C.: Pattern-based explanation for automated decisions. In: Proceedings of ECAI, pp. 669–674 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lazanas, A., Karacapilidis, N.: Augmenting transportation-related recommendations through data mining. Int. J. Adv. Intell. Paradigms 2(1), 78–89 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Karacapilidis, N., Hatzieleftheriou, L.: A hybrid framework for similarity-based recommendations. Int. J. Bus. Intell. Data Min. 1(1), 107–121 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikos Karacapilidis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: User Reviews

Appendix: User Reviews

User1 

Great Hotel! My fiancée and I stayed at the Hotel Monaco over the recent Thanksgiving holiday. The hotel is fantastic. The rooms are very comfortable and clean. The management is very responsive. During our second night, the people in the room next to us were extremely loud. When I told the manager this in the morning, I was immediately given 1/2 off the night’s stay and moved to suite at no additional cost. The hotel location is ideal, within walking distance of the fish market, shops, bars and restaurants. I highly recommend staying here.

User2 

Very Impressed! My husband and I stayed in the Monaco for 3 nights and had a wonderful time. Seattle is an amazingly clean city and the Hotel Monaco was also spotless. Our room and bathroom were quite small and quite dark but, as we were really only sleeping there, this didn’t bother us. The room however, is perfectly equipped and the bed was really comfortable. The lobby of the hotel is quite impressive and the staff was very friendly. We didn’t eat at the hotel restaurant but it was very nice and always very busy. The hotel is ideally situated for seeing all of Seattle although, everyone should be aware that Seattle is a very hilly city in parts. We had a great stay at the Monaco and I would highly recommend it and indeed Seattle.

User3 

Excellent Stayed in Hotel Monaco this past w/e, found it a delight. The reception staff is friendly and professional; our room was smart with a very comfortable bed. We particularly liked the reception our small dog received, all the staff guests spoke to him, he loved it. My only mild negative is the distance (uphill) from PPMarket and restaurants on 1st. Overall a great experience.

User4 

Very Nice Hotel and Staff The hotel is in a good location. My room was very comfortable and a nice size. The staff was extremely accommodating. I would definitely stay there again.

User5 

Wonderful relaxing stay. Everything was a breeze, from check-into check-out. The beds were incredibly comfortable and the room (a double queen room) was spacious. I especially liked the l’occitane shampoo and conditioner; it’s a nice treat when the toiletries are nicer than what I use on a normal day. I would recommend this hotel to anyone who wants an upgrade to the other nearby downtown hotels.

User6 

Great Experience. Much more interesting than staying at the bigger chains, and I’ve had good experiences with the Seattle Sheraton. Staff is very friendly, as are most people in Seattle, and rooms have a lot of cool features, including the optional gold fish and bathrobes. I’d definitely stay again.

User7 

Excellent Stay! What a delightful surprise to stay at the Monaco. We thoroughly enjoyed our stay. The room was very comfortable, lovely amenities, and friendly staff. Especially enjoyed the hour of indulgence!! Definitely will come back!

User8 

Fantastic Service! Stayed here for my girlfriend’s birthday over a weekend in June. While the rooms were on the smallish side, they were nicely decorated and the bed was extremely comfortable.. During our stay, the staff was extremely friendly, polite, and helpful. We found the concierge staff to be especially helpful. We are looking forward to another trip to Seattle and stay at the Monaco!

User9 

Horrible Customer Service. My friend and I picked the Hotel Monaco because of its appealing website and online package which included champagne, late checkout at 3, free valet and a gift from the spa for the weekend … Sunday morning we called the front desk to speak to management about the sheets and they became very aggravated and rude with us. The young man we spoke to said that they would cover the food, adding that the person that changed the sheets said that it was fresh blood, in a very rude tone. Our checkout was at 3 pm because of the package that we booked. I finally packed all my things up and went downstairs to check out. Quickly signed the paper and took off. When on the way, I took a closer look at the room bill. Unfortunately they never covered the food, which they had offered and we were charged for the valet. I called the front desk to ask about the charges, the lady that answered snapped back saying that they were aware of the problem we experienced. I have never in my life been treated like this at any hotel anywhere. I am not sure if this hotel constantly has problems or if we were the lucky ones, but I would never recommend it to anybody I know.

User10 

Disappointing Hotel Monaco has very little going for it except location. In fact, I would hazard to say they go out of their way to stay away from guest. We had 4 in the room including our children and staff kept leaving only 3 sets of towels. Not a big deal but for $320/night I expect better. This hotel has some management problems that need to be addressed. The restaurant was nothing but ordinary and way overpriced. The rooms are dull but spacious. The evening wine reception is a nice touch but the way the lobby is arranged makes for a poor place to try and meet other guest. Really not worth the time. At the end of the day I was sorely disappointed and would not go back.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Charissiadis, A., Karacapilidis, N. (2015). Strengthening the Rationale of Recommendations Through a Hybrid Explanations Building Framework. In: Neves-Silva, R., Jain, L., Howlett, R. (eds) Intelligent Decision Technologies. IDT 2017. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 39. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19857-6_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19857-6_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19856-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19857-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics