Skip to main content

Adaptive Approach for Impact Analysis in Enterprise Architectures

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 220))

Abstract

Due to the large size of typical Enterprise Architecture models, it is often difficult for humans to fully grasp their contents. Moreover, because of their inherent complexity, the task of generating additional value from these models is very challenging without suitable analysis methods. Impact analysis, which determines the effects of changes or failures on other architectural elements, can therefore provide valuable information for enterprise architects. Whether an element is affected depends on its context, i.e. its (transitive) connections to other elements and their semantics with respect to the analysis. In this paper, we propose a generic, context-sensitive approach to the implementation of impact analyses. This method relies on the technique of data-flow analysis to propagate the effects through the model. Since the analysis specification only relies on a set of relationship classes, it can be easily adapted to the needs of organization-specific EA meta models by providing custom mappings for the respective types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Närman, P., Buschle, M., Ekstedt, M.: An enterprise architecture framework for multi-attribute information systems analysis. Softw. Syst. Model. 13(3), 1085–1116 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Niemann, K.D.: From Enterprise Architecture to IT Governance. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jonkers, H., Iacob, M.E.: Performance and cost analysis of service-oriented enterprise architectures. In: Global Implications of Modern Enterprise Information Systems: Technologies and Applications. IGI Global (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Matthes, F., Monahov, I., Schneider, A., Schulz, C.: EAM KPI Catalog v 1.0. Technical report, Technical University Munich (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. de Boer, F., Bonsangue, M., Groenewegen, L., Stam, A., Stevens, S., van der Torre, L.: Change impact analysis of enterprise architectures. In: IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration, Conference, IRI 2005, pp. 177–181, August 2005

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kurpjuweit, S., Aier, S.: Ein allgemeiner Ansatz zur Ableitung von Abhängigkeitsanalysen auf Unternehmensarchitekturmodellen. In: Wirtschaftinformatik Proceedings 2009, January 2009

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bohner, S.: Software change impacts - an evolving perspective. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Software Maintenance, pp. 263–272 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lehnert, S.: A review of software change impact analysis. Ilmenau University of Technology. Technical report (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Briand, L., Labiche, Y., O’Sullivan, L.: Impact analysis and change management of UML models. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Software Maintenance ICSM, pp. 256–265 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. von Knethen, A., Grund, M.: QuaTrace: a tool environment for (semi-) automatic impact analysis based on traces. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Software Maintenance ICSM, pp. 246–255 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Saat, J.: Zeitbezogene Abhängigkeitsanalysen der Unternehmensarchitektur. Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2010, 29 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Holschke, O., Närman, P., Flores, W.R., Eriksson, E., Schönherr, M.: Using enterprise architecture models and bayesian belief networks for failure impact analysis. In: Feuerlicht, G., Lamersdorf, W. (eds.) ICSOC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5472, pp. 339–350. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Tang, A., Nicholson, A., Jin, Y., Han, J.: Using bayesian belief networks for change impact analysis in architecture design. J. Syst. Softw. 80(1), 127–148 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Buckl, S., Ernst, A., Lankes, J., Matthes, F.: Enterprise architecture management pattern catalog (version 1.0). Technical report TB 0801. Technical University Munich, Chair for Informatics 19 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jagt, R.: Support for multiple cause diagnosis with bayesian networks. Master of science thesis, Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands and Information Sciences Department, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA, Pittsburgh (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar, A., Raghavan, P., Ramanathan, J., Ramnath, R.: Enterprise interaction ontology for change impact analysis of complex systems. In: IEEE Asia-Pacific Services Computing Conference APSCC, pp. 303–309 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Aryani, A., Peake, I., Hamilton, M.: Domain-based change propagation analysis: an enterprise system case study. In: IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM), pp. 1–9 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lankhorst, M.: Enterprise Architecture at Work. Springer, GmbH & Co. KG, Heidelberg, Berlin (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Saad, C., Bauer, B.: The model analysis framework - an IDE for static model analysis. In: Proceedings of the Industry Track of Software Language Engineering (ITSLE) in the Context of the 4th International Conference on Software Language Engineering (SLE 2011), May 2011

    Google Scholar 

  20. Saad, C., Bauer, B.: Data-flow based model analysis and its applications. In: Moreira, A., Schätz, B., Gray, J., Vallecillo, A., Clarke, P. (eds.) MODELS 2013. LNCS, vol. 8107, pp. 707–723. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. The Open Group: ArchiMate 2.0 specification: Open Group Standard. Van Haren Publishing (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. U.S. Department of Defense: The DoDAF Architecture Framework Version 2.02 (2010). http://dodcio.defense.gov/dodaf20.aspx. Accessed 15 March 2015

  23. MID GmbH: MID Innovator for Enterprise Architects (2014). http://www.mid.de/produkte/innovator-enterprise-modeling.html. Accessed 15 April 2014

  24. Kienberger, J., Minnerup, P., Kuntz, S., Bauer, B.: Analysis and validation of AUTOSAR models. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially sponsored by the FuE-Programm Informations- und Kommunikationstechnik Bayern. The authors would like to thank MID GmbH for providing their demo use case, licenses for their tool as well as for their support during the implementation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melanie Langermeier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Langermeier, M., Saad, C., Bauer, B. (2015). Adaptive Approach for Impact Analysis in Enterprise Architectures. In: Shishkov, B. (eds) Business Modeling and Software Design. BMSD 2014. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 220. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20052-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20052-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20051-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20052-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics