Skip to main content

Formalizing Customization in Persuasive Technologies

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9072))

Abstract

Many authors have noted that customization increases the effectiveness of persuasive technologies. Also, many empirical demonstrations of successful customization efforts exist in the persuasive technology literature. However, a clear formal framework to describe and evaluate customization is lacking. This leads to the worrisome conclusion that statements like: “customization is beneficial” are often ill-defined given the empirical demonstration at hand. In this paper we forward a formalization of customization to prevent such problems. We derive a number of assumptions regarding the data-generating model that need to be met for customization to be fruitful, and we provide several examples of customization criteria. This paper serves as a discussion piece for the persuasive technology conference to evaluate the use and value of (mathematical) formalizations of customization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adomavicius, G., Tuzhilin, A.: Personalization technologies. Communications of the ACM 48(10), 83–90 (2005), http://dl.acm.org/ft_gateway.cfm?id=1089109&type=html

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ansari, A., Mela, C.F.: E-Customization. Journal of Marketing Research 40(2), 131–145 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Armentano, M.G., Amandi, A.A.: Recognition of user intentions for interface agents with variable order markov models. In: Houben, G.-J., McCalla, G., Pianesi, F., Zancanaro, M. (eds.) UMAP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5535, pp. 173–184. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Arora, N., Dreze, X., Ghose, A., Hess, J.D., Iyengar, R., Jing, B., Joshi, Y., Kumar, V., Lurie, N., Neslin, S.: Putting one-to-one marketing to work: Personalization, customization, and choice. Marketing Letters 19(3), 305–321 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Beun, R.J.: Persuasive strategies in mobile insomnia therapy: alignment, adaptation, and motivational support. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 17(6), 1187–1195 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Busch, M., Schrammel, J., Tscheligi, M.: Personalized persuasive technology–development and validation of scales for measuring persuadability. In: Berkovsky, S., Freyne, J. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2013. LNCS, vol. 7822, pp. 33–38. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., Kao, C.F., Rodriguez, R.: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(5), 1032–1043 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Churchill, E.F.: Putting the person back into personalization. Interactions 20(5), 12–15 (2013), http://dl.acm.org/ft_gateway.cfm?id=2504847&type=html

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dijkstra, A., De Vries, H.: The development of computer-generated tailored interventions. Patient Education and Counseling 36(2), 193–203 (1999), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10223023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dijkstra, A.: Working mechanisms of computer-tailored health education: evidence from smoking cessation. Health Education Research 20(5), 527–539 (2005), http://her.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/5/527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Halko, S., Kientz, J.A.: Personality and persuasive technology: An exploratory study on health-promoting mobile applications. In: Ploug, T., Hasle, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6137, pp. 150–161. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Haugtvedt, C.P., Petty, R.E.: Personality and persuasion: Need for cognition moderates the persistence and resistance of attitude changes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63(2), 308–319 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Haugtvedt, C.P., Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T.: Need for cognition and advertising: Understanding the role of personality variables in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology 1(3), 239–260 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hirsh, J.B., Kang, S.K., Bodenhausen, G.V.: Personalized Persuasion: Tailoring Persuasive Appeals to Recipients’ Personality Traits. Psychological Science (April 2012), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22547658

  15. Ho, S.Y., Bodoff, D., Tam, K.Y.: Timing of Adaptive Web Personalization and Its Effects on Online Consumer Behavior. Information Systems Research 22(3), 660–679 (2010), http://isr.journal.informs.org/cgi/doi/10.1287/isre.1090.0262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaptein, M.C., van Halteren, A.: Adaptive Persuasive Messaging to Increase Service Retention. Journal of Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 17(6), 1173–1185 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaptein, M., Lacroix, J., Saini, P.: Individual Differences in Persuadability in the Health Promotion Domain. In: Ploug, T., Hasle, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6137, pp. 94–105. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaptein, M.C., de Ruyter, B., Markopoulos, P., Aarts, E.: Tailored Persuasive Text Messages to Reduce Snacking. Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems 2(2), 10–35 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Moon, Y.: Personalization and Personality: Some Effects of Customizing Message Style Based on Consumer Personality. Journal of Consumer Psychology 12(4), 313–325 (2002), http://ezproxy.stanford.edu:2197/stable/1480285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Neville, L.M., O’Hara, B., Milat, A.J.: Computer-tailored dietary behaviour change interventions: a systematic review. Health Education Research 24, 699–720 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Noar, S.M., Benac, C.N., Harris, M.S.: Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychological Bulletin 133(4), 673–693 (2007), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17592961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M.: Persuasive Systems Design: Key Issues, Process Model, and System Features. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 24(1), 485–500 (2009), http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol24/iss1/28/

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pentland, A.: A computational model of social signalin. In: 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, ICPR 2006, vol. 1, pp. 1080–1083. IEEE (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Smeets, T., Brug, J., de Vries, H.: Effects of tailoring health messages on physical activity. Health Education Research 23(3), 402–413 (2008), http://her.oxfordjournals.org/content/23/3/402.short

  25. Sollenberger, D.J., Singh, M.P.: Methodology for engineering affective social applications. In: Gomez-Sanz, J.J. (ed.) AOSE 2009. LNCS, vol. 6038, pp. 97–109. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Tormala, Z.L., DeSensi, V.L.: The Effects of Minority/Majority Source Status on Attitude Certainty: A Matching Perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 35(1), 114–125 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. C. Kaptein .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kaptein, M.C. (2015). Formalizing Customization in Persuasive Technologies. In: MacTavish, T., Basapur, S. (eds) Persuasive Technology. PERSUASIVE 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9072. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20305-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20306-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics