Abstract
Many authors have noted that customization increases the effectiveness of persuasive technologies. Also, many empirical demonstrations of successful customization efforts exist in the persuasive technology literature. However, a clear formal framework to describe and evaluate customization is lacking. This leads to the worrisome conclusion that statements like: “customization is beneficial” are often ill-defined given the empirical demonstration at hand. In this paper we forward a formalization of customization to prevent such problems. We derive a number of assumptions regarding the data-generating model that need to be met for customization to be fruitful, and we provide several examples of customization criteria. This paper serves as a discussion piece for the persuasive technology conference to evaluate the use and value of (mathematical) formalizations of customization.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adomavicius, G., Tuzhilin, A.: Personalization technologies. Communications of the ACM 48(10), 83–90 (2005), http://dl.acm.org/ft_gateway.cfm?id=1089109&type=html
Ansari, A., Mela, C.F.: E-Customization. Journal of Marketing Research 40(2), 131–145 (2003)
Armentano, M.G., Amandi, A.A.: Recognition of user intentions for interface agents with variable order markov models. In: Houben, G.-J., McCalla, G., Pianesi, F., Zancanaro, M. (eds.) UMAP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5535, pp. 173–184. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Arora, N., Dreze, X., Ghose, A., Hess, J.D., Iyengar, R., Jing, B., Joshi, Y., Kumar, V., Lurie, N., Neslin, S.: Putting one-to-one marketing to work: Personalization, customization, and choice. Marketing Letters 19(3), 305–321 (2008)
Beun, R.J.: Persuasive strategies in mobile insomnia therapy: alignment, adaptation, and motivational support. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 17(6), 1187–1195 (2013)
Busch, M., Schrammel, J., Tscheligi, M.: Personalized persuasive technology–development and validation of scales for measuring persuadability. In: Berkovsky, S., Freyne, J. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2013. LNCS, vol. 7822, pp. 33–38. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., Kao, C.F., Rodriguez, R.: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(5), 1032–1043 (1986)
Churchill, E.F.: Putting the person back into personalization. Interactions 20(5), 12–15 (2013), http://dl.acm.org/ft_gateway.cfm?id=2504847&type=html
Dijkstra, A., De Vries, H.: The development of computer-generated tailored interventions. Patient Education and Counseling 36(2), 193–203 (1999), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10223023
Dijkstra, A.: Working mechanisms of computer-tailored health education: evidence from smoking cessation. Health Education Research 20(5), 527–539 (2005), http://her.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/20/5/527
Halko, S., Kientz, J.A.: Personality and persuasive technology: An exploratory study on health-promoting mobile applications. In: Ploug, T., Hasle, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6137, pp. 150–161. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Haugtvedt, C.P., Petty, R.E.: Personality and persuasion: Need for cognition moderates the persistence and resistance of attitude changes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63(2), 308–319 (1992)
Haugtvedt, C.P., Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T.: Need for cognition and advertising: Understanding the role of personality variables in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology 1(3), 239–260 (1992)
Hirsh, J.B., Kang, S.K., Bodenhausen, G.V.: Personalized Persuasion: Tailoring Persuasive Appeals to Recipients’ Personality Traits. Psychological Science (April 2012), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22547658
Ho, S.Y., Bodoff, D., Tam, K.Y.: Timing of Adaptive Web Personalization and Its Effects on Online Consumer Behavior. Information Systems Research 22(3), 660–679 (2010), http://isr.journal.informs.org/cgi/doi/10.1287/isre.1090.0262
Kaptein, M.C., van Halteren, A.: Adaptive Persuasive Messaging to Increase Service Retention. Journal of Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 17(6), 1173–1185 (2012)
Kaptein, M., Lacroix, J., Saini, P.: Individual Differences in Persuadability in the Health Promotion Domain. In: Ploug, T., Hasle, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6137, pp. 94–105. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Kaptein, M.C., de Ruyter, B., Markopoulos, P., Aarts, E.: Tailored Persuasive Text Messages to Reduce Snacking. Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems 2(2), 10–35 (2012)
Moon, Y.: Personalization and Personality: Some Effects of Customizing Message Style Based on Consumer Personality. Journal of Consumer Psychology 12(4), 313–325 (2002), http://ezproxy.stanford.edu:2197/stable/1480285
Neville, L.M., O’Hara, B., Milat, A.J.: Computer-tailored dietary behaviour change interventions: a systematic review. Health Education Research 24, 699–720 (2009)
Noar, S.M., Benac, C.N., Harris, M.S.: Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychological Bulletin 133(4), 673–693 (2007), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17592961
Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M.: Persuasive Systems Design: Key Issues, Process Model, and System Features. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 24(1), 485–500 (2009), http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol24/iss1/28/
Pentland, A.: A computational model of social signalin. In: 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, ICPR 2006, vol. 1, pp. 1080–1083. IEEE (2006)
Smeets, T., Brug, J., de Vries, H.: Effects of tailoring health messages on physical activity. Health Education Research 23(3), 402–413 (2008), http://her.oxfordjournals.org/content/23/3/402.short
Sollenberger, D.J., Singh, M.P.: Methodology for engineering affective social applications. In: Gomez-Sanz, J.J. (ed.) AOSE 2009. LNCS, vol. 6038, pp. 97–109. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Tormala, Z.L., DeSensi, V.L.: The Effects of Minority/Majority Source Status on Attitude Certainty: A Matching Perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 35(1), 114–125 (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kaptein, M.C. (2015). Formalizing Customization in Persuasive Technologies. In: MacTavish, T., Basapur, S. (eds) Persuasive Technology. PERSUASIVE 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9072. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20305-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20306-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)