Skip to main content

Case-Supported Principle-Based Behavior Paradigm

  • Chapter
A Construction Manual for Robots' Ethical Systems

Part of the book series: Cognitive Technologies ((COGTECH))

Abstract

We assert that ethical decision-making is, to a degree, computable. Some claim that no actions can be said to be ethically correct because all value judgments are relative either to societies or individuals. We maintain, however, along with most ethicists, that there is agreement on the ethically relevant features in many particular cases of ethical dilemmas and on the right course of action in those cases. Just as stories of disasters often overshadow positive stories in the news, so difficult ethical issues are often the subject of discussion rather than those that have been resolved, making it seem as if there is no consensus in ethics. Although, admittedly, a consensus of ethicists may not exist for a number of domains and actions, such a consensus is likely to emerge in many areas in which intelligent autonomous systems are likely to be deployed and for the actions they are likely to undertake.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anderson, M., Anderson, S., Armen, C.: MedEthEx: a prototype medical ethics advisor. In: Proceedings of the Eighteenth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Boston, MA, August 2006

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, M., Anderson, S.L.: GenEth: a general ethical dilemma analyzer. In: 11th International Symposium on Formalizations of Commonsense Reasoning, Ayia Napa, Greece, May 2013

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ross, W.D.: The Right and the Good. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1930)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson, M., Anderson, S.L.: Machine ethics: creating an ethical intelligent agent. Artif. Intell. Mag. 28, 4 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lavrač, N., Džeroski, S.: Inductive Logic Programming: Techniques and Applications. Ellis Harwood, New York (1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Anderson, M., Anderson, S.L.: Robot be Good. Scientific American Magazine, October 2010

    Google Scholar 

  7. Turing, A.M.: Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 59, 433–460 (1950)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Allen, C., Varner, G., Zinser, J.: Prolegomena to any future artificial moral agent. J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell. 12, 251–261 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Waldrop, M.M.: A question of responsibility (Chap. 11). In: Man Made Minds: The Promise of Artificial Intelligence. Walker and Company, NY (1987). (Reprinted in R. Dejoie et al., eds. Ethical Issues in Information Systems. Boston, MA: Boyd and Fraser, 1991, pp. 260–277.)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gips, J.: Towards the Ethical Robot. Android Epistemology, pp. 243–252. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Khan, A.F.U.: The Ethics of Autonomous Learning Systems. Android Epistemology, pp. 253–265. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grau, C.: There is no “I” in “Robot”: robots and utilitarianism. IEEE Intell. Syst. 21(4), 52–55 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Powers, T.M.: Prospects for a Kantian machine. IEEE Intell. Syst. 21(4), 46–51 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rzepka, R., Araki, K.: What could statistics do for ethics? The idea of common sense processing based safety valve. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Machine Ethics, pp. 85–87. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Guarini, M.: Particularism and the classification and reclassification of moral cases. IEEE Intell. Syst. 21(4), 22–28 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McLaren, B.M.: Extensionally defining principles and cases in ethics: an AI model. Artif. Intell. J. 150, 145–181 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Bringsjord, S., Arkoudas, K., Bello, P.: Towards a general logicist methodology for engineering ethically correct robots. IEEE Intell. Syst. 21(4), 38–44 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pereira, L.M., Saptawijaya, A.: Modeling morality with prospective logic. Prog. Artif. Intell.: Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 4874, 99–111 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This material is based in part upon work supported by the United States National Science Foundation under Grant Numbers IIS-0500133 and IIS-1151305.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Anderson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anderson, M., Anderson, S.L. (2015). Case-Supported Principle-Based Behavior Paradigm. In: Trappl, R. (eds) A Construction Manual for Robots' Ethical Systems. Cognitive Technologies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21548-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21548-8_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21547-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21548-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics