Abstract
We present a three objective formulation of regression test prioritisation. Our formulation involves the well-known, and widely-used objectives of Average Percentage of Statement Coverage (APSC) and Effective Execution Time (EET). However, we additionally include the Average Percentage of Change Coverage (APCC), which has not previously been used in search-based regression test optimisation. We apply our approach to prioritise the base and the collection package of the Guava project, which contains over 26,815 test cases. Our results demonstrate the value of search-based test case prioritisation: the sequences we find require only 0.2 % of the 26,815 test cases and only 0.45 % of their effective execution time. However, we find solutions that achieve more than 99.9 % of both regression testing objectives; covering both changed code and existing code. We also investigate the tension between these two objectives for Guava.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Yoo, S., Harman, M.: Regression testing minimization, selection and prioritisation: a survey. Softw. Test. Verification Reliab. 22(2), 67–120 (2012)
Rothermel, G., Untch, R.H., Chu, C., Harrold, M.J.: Prioritizing test cases for regression testing. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 27(10), 929–948 (2001)
Huang, P., Ma, X., Shen, D., Zhou, Y.: Performance regression testing target prioritisation via performance risk analysis. In: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 60–71. ACM, May 2014
Guava Project Web Site. https://github.com/google/guava
http://blog.takipi.com/google-guava-5-things-you-never-knew-it-can-do/
Jiang, B., Chan, W.K.: On the integration of test adequacy, test case prioritisation, and statistical fault localization. In: 2010 10th International Conference on Quality Software (QSIC), pp. 377–384. IEEE (2010)
Elbaum, S., Malishevsky, A.G., Rothermel, G.: Test case prioritisation: a family of empirical studies. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 28(2), 159–182 (2002)
Li, Z., Harman, M., Hierons, R.M.: Search algorithms for regression test case prioritisation. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 33(4), 225–237 (2007)
Yoo, S., Harman, M.: Pareto efficient multi-objective test case selection. In: Proceedings of the 2007 International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, pp. 140–150. ACM (2007)
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., et al.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(2), 182–197 (2002)
Harman, M.: Making the case for MORTO: multi objective regression test optimization. In: ICST Workshops, pp. 111–114 (2011)
Sun, W., Gao, Z., Yang, W., et al.: Multi-objective test case prioritization for GUI applications. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. pp. 1074–1079. ACM (2013)
Snchez, A.B., Segura, S., Ruiz-Corts, A.A.: Comparison of test case prioritization criteria for software product lines. In: 2014 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST), pp. 41–50. IEEE (2014)
Li, Z., Bian, Y., Zhao, R., Cheng, J.: A fine-grained parallel multi-objective test case prioritization on GPU. In: Ruhe, G., Zhang, Y. (eds.) SSBSE 2013. LNCS, vol. 8084, pp. 111–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Epitropakis, M.G., Yoo, S., Harman, M., Burke, E.K.: Empirical evaluation of pareto efficient multi-objective regression test case prioritisation. In: Proceedings of the 2015 International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, pp. 234–245. ACM (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bian, Y., Kirbas, S., Harman, M., Jia, Y., Li, Z. (2015). Regression Test Case Prioritisation for Guava. In: Barros, M., Labiche, Y. (eds) Search-Based Software Engineering. SSBSE 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9275. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22183-0_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22183-0_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22182-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22183-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)