Skip to main content

A Logic Based Approach for Restoring Consistency in P2P Deductive Databases

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Database and Expert Systems Applications (Globe 2015, DEXA 2015)

Abstract

This paper stems from the work in [10] in which the declarative semantics of a P2P system is defined in terms of minimal weak models. Under this semantics each peer uses its mapping rules to import minimal sets of mapping atoms allowing to satisfy its local integrity constraints. This behavior results to be useful in real world P2P systems in which peers often use the available import mechanisms to extract knowledge from the rest of the system only if this knowledge is strictly needed to repair an inconsistent local database. Then, an inconsistent peer, in the interaction with different peers, just imports the information allowing to restore consistency, that is minimal sets of atoms allowing the peer to enrich its knowledge so that restoring inconsistency anomalies. The paper extends previous work by proposing a rewriting technique that allows modeling a P2P system, \({\mathcal{{PS}}}\), as a unique logic program whose minimal models correspond to the minimal weak models of \({\mathcal{{PS}}}\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The syntax of facts, standard rules and mapping rules, here presented in an informal way, will be formally defined in the following section.

  2. 2.

    Assuming that \(max(\emptyset )=false\) and \(min(\emptyset )=true\).

  3. 3.

    A built-in atom is of the form \(X \theta Y\), where X and Y are terms and \(\theta \) is a comparison predicate.

  4. 4.

    The symbol \(\vee \) denotes inclusive disjunction and is different from \(\oplus \) as the latter denotes exclusive disjunction. It should be recalled that inclusive disjunction allows more than one atom to be true while exclusive disjunction allows only one atom to be true.

References

  1. Bernstein, P.A., Giunchiglia, F., Kementsietsidis, A., Mylopulos, J., Serafini, L., Zaihrayen, I.: Data management for peer-to-peer computing: a vision. WebDB 2002, 89–94 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brewka, G., Eiter, T.: Preferred answer sets for extended logic programs. Artif. Intell. 109(1–2), 297–356 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Brewka, G., Niemela, I., Truszczynski, M.: Answer set optimization. In: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 867–872 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lenzerini, M., Rosati, R.: Logical foundations of peer-to-peer data integration. In: PODS Conference, pp. 241–251 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Caroprese, L., Greco, S., Zumpano, E.: A logic programming approach to querying and integrating P2P deductive databases. In: FLAIRS, pp. 31–36 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Caroprese, L., Molinaro, C., Zumpano, E.: Integrating and querying P2P deductive databases. In: IDEAS, pp. 285–290 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Caroprese, L., Zumpano, E.: Consistent data integration in P2P deductive databases. In: Prade, H., Subrahmanian, V.S. (eds.) SUM 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4772, pp. 230–243. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Caroprese, L., Zumpano, E.: Modeling cooperation in P2P data management systems. In: ISMIS, pp. 225-235 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Caroprese, L., Zumpano, E.: Handling preferences in P2P systems. In: FOIKS, pp. 91–106 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Caroprese, L., Zumpano, E.: Restoring consistency in P2P deductive databases. In: Hüllermeier, E., Link, S., Fober, T., Seeger, B. (eds.) SUM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7520, pp. 168–179. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Delgrande, J.P., Schaub, T., Tompits, H.: A framework for compiling preferences in logic programs. TPLP 3(2), 129–187 (2003)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Franconi, E., Kuper, G.M., Lopatenko, A., Zaihrayeu, I.: A robust logical and computational characterisation of peer-to-peer database systems. In: DBISP2P, pp. 64–76 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gribble, S., Halevy, A., Ives, Z., Rodrig, M., Suciu, D.: What can databases do for peer-to-peer? In: WebDB, pp. 31–36 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Halevy, A., Ives, Z., Suciu, D., Tatarinov, I.: Schema mediation in peer data management systems. In: International Conference on Database Theory, pp. 505–516 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Madhavan, J., Halevy, A.Y.: Composing mappings among data sources. In: International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, pp. 572–583 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sakama, C., Inoue, K.: Prioritized logic programming and its application to commonsense reasoning. Artif. Intell. 123, 185–222 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Tatarinov, I., Halevy., A.: Efficient query reformulation in peer data management systems. In: SIGMOD, pp. 539–550 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luciano Caroprese .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Caroprese, L., Zumpano, E. (2015). A Logic Based Approach for Restoring Consistency in P2P Deductive Databases. In: Chen, Q., Hameurlain, A., Toumani, F., Wagner, R., Decker, H. (eds) Database and Expert Systems Applications. Globe DEXA 2015 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9262. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22852-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22852-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22851-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22852-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics