Abstract
Discovering and reasoning about deviations of business process executions (from intended designs) enables organizations to continuously evaluate their execution/performance relative to their strategic goals. We leverage the observation that a deviating process instance can be viewed as a valid variant of the intended process design provided it achieves the same goals as the intended process design. However, organizations often find it difficult to categorize and classify process execution deviations in a goal-based fashion (necessary to decide if a deviation represents a valid variant). Given that industry-scale knowledge-intensive processes typically manifest a large number of variants, this can pose a problem. In this paper, we propose an approach to help decide whether process instances in execution logs are valid variants using the goal-based notion of validity described above. Our proposed approach also enables analysis of the impact of contextual factors in the execution of specific goal-aligned process variants. We demonstrate our approach with an Eclipse-based plugin and evaluate it using an industry-scale setting in IT Incident Management with a process log of 25000 events.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ayora, C., Torres, V., Weber, B., Reichert, M., Pelechano, V.: Vivace: A framework for the systematic evaluation of variability support in process-aware information systems. Information and Software Technology 57, 248–276 (2015)
Becker, J., Pfeiffer, D., Räckers, M., Falk, T., Czerwonka, M.: Semantic business process modelling and analysis. In: Handbook on Business Process Management 1, pp. 187–217. Springer (2015)
Beheshti, S.-M.-R., Benatallah, B., Motahari-Nezhad, H.R.: Enabling the analysis of cross-cutting aspects in ad-hoc processes. In: Salinesi, C., Norrie, M.C., Pastor, Ó. (eds.) CAiSE 2013. LNCS, vol. 7908, pp. 51–67. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38709-8_4
Borici, A., Thomo, A.: Semantic graph compression with hypergraphs. In: 2014 IEEE 28th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA), pp. 1097–1104. IEEE (2014)
Buijs, J.C.A.M., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Mining configurable process models from collections of event logs. In: Daniel, F., Wang, J., Weber, B. (eds.) BPM 2013. LNCS, vol. 8094, pp. 33–48. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Czarnecki, K., Grünbacher, P., Rabiser, R., Schmid, K., sowski, A.: Cool features and tough decisions: a comparison of variability modeling approaches. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Variability Modeling of Software-Intensive Systems, pp. 173–182. ACM (2012)
Di Ciccio, C., Marrella, A., Russo, A.: Knowledge-intensive processes: Characteristics, requirements and analysis of contemporary approaches. Journal on Data Semantics, 1–29 (2014)
Dreiling, A., Recker, J.C.: Towards a theoretical framework for organizational innovation. In: Proceedings of the 17th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems. Association for Information Systems (2013)
Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: Fundamentals of business process management. Springer, Berlin (2013)
Ghose, A.K., Narendra, N.C., Ponnalagu, K., Panda, A., Gohad, A.: Goal-driven business process derivation. In: Kappel, G., Maamar, Z., Motahari-Nezhad, H.R. (eds.) Service Oriented Computing. LNCS, vol. 7084, pp. 467–476. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Ginsberg, M.L., Smith, D.E.: Reasoning about action i: A possible worlds approach. Artificial Intelligence 35(2), 165–195 (1988)
Hallerbach, A., Bauer, T., Reichert, M.: Capturing variability in business process models: the provop approach. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice 22(6–7), 519–546 (2010)
Hallerbach, A., Bauer, T., Reichert, M.: Capturing variability in business process models: the provop approach. J. Softw. Maint. Evol. 22, 519–546 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smr.v22:6/7
Heath, D., Singh, R., Shephard, B.: Approaching strategic misalignment from an organizational view of business processes. In: 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 4055–4064. IEEE (2013)
Carbonell, J.: Context-based machine translation. In: Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas, pp. 19–28 (2006)
Khodabandelou, G., Hug, C., Deneckere, R., Salinesi, C.: Supervised intentional process models discovery using hidden markov models. In: 2013 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), pp. 1–11. IEEE (2013)
Lapouchnian, A., Yu, Y., Mylopoulos, J.: Requirements-driven design and configuration management of business processes. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 246–261. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75183-0_18
de Leoni, M., van der Aalst, W.M.: Data-aware process mining: discovering decisions in processes using alignments. In: Proceedings of the 28th annual ACM symposium on applied computing, pp. 1454–1461. ACM (2013)
de Leoni, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Dees, M.: A general framework for correlating business process characteristics. In: Sadiq, S., Soffer, P., Völzer, H. (eds.) BPM 2014. LNCS, vol. 8659, pp. 250–266. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
Malinova, M., Dijkman, R., Mendling, J.: Automatic extraction of process categories from process model collections. In: Lohmann, N., Song, M., Wohed, P. (eds.) BPM 2013 Workshops. LNBIP, vol. 171, pp. 430–441. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
Mani, S., Sankaranarayanan, K., Sinha, V.S., Devanbu, P.T.: Panning requirement nuggets in stream of software maintenance tickets. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering, (FSE-22), pp. 678–688 (2014)
Messai, N., Bouaud, J., Aufaure, M.-A., Zelek, L., Séroussi, B.: Using formal concept analysis to discover patterns of non-compliance with clinical practice guidelines: a case study in the management of breast cancer. In: Peleg, M., Lavrač, N., Combi, C. (eds.) AIME 2011. LNCS, vol. 6747, pp. 119–128. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Motahari-Nezhad, H., Saint-Paul, R., Casati, F., Benatallah, B.: Event correlation for process discovery from web service interaction logs. The VLDB Journal 20(3), 417–444 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00778-010-0203-9
Ponnalagu, K., Narendra, N.C., Ghose, A., Chiktey, N., Tamilselvam, S.: Goal oriented variability modeling in service-based business processes. In: Basu, S., Pautasso, C., Zhang, L., Fu, X. (eds.) ICSOC 2013. LNCS, vol. 8274, pp. 499–506. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Reichert, M., Hallerbach, A., Bauer, T.: Lifecycle management of business process variants. In: Handbook on Business Process Management 1, pp. 251–278. Springer (2015)
van der Aalst, W., Adriansyah, A., de Medeiros, A.K.A., Arcieri, F., Baier, T., Blickle, T., Bose, J.C., van den Brand, P., et al.: Process mining manifesto. In: Daniel, F., Barkaoui, K., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2011, Part I. LNBIP, vol. 99, pp. 169–194. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Van Der Aalst, W.M., Weske, M.: To interorganizational workflows. Seminal Contributions to Information Systems Engineering: 25 Years of CAiSE, p. 289 (2013)
Weber, B., Zeitelhofer, S., Pinggera, J., Torres, V., Reichert, M.: How advanced change patterns impact the process of process modeling. In: Bider, I., Gaaloul, K., Krogstie, J., Nurcan, S., Proper, H.A., Schmidt, R., Soffer, P. (eds.) BPMDS 2014 and EMMSAD 2014. LNBIP, vol. 175, pp. 17–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
Winslett, M.: Reasoning about action using a possible models approach. Urbana 51, 61801 (1988)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ponnalagu, K., Ghose, A., Narendra, N.C., Dam, H.K. (2015). Goal-Aligned Categorization of Instance Variants in Knowledge-Intensive Processes. In: Motahari-Nezhad, H., Recker, J., Weidlich, M. (eds) Business Process Management. BPM 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9253. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23063-4_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23063-4_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23062-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23063-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)