Abstract
The “doctor in the loop” is a new paradigm in information driven medicine, picturing the doctor as authority inside a loop supplying an expert system with information on actual patients, treatment results and possible additional (side-)effects, as well as general information in order to enhance data driven medical science, as well as giving back treatment advice to the doctor himself. While this approach offers several positive aspects related to P4 medicine (personal, predictive, preventive and participatory), it also relies heavily on the authenticity of the data and increases the reliance on the security of databases, as well as on the correctness of machine learning algorithms. In this paper we propose a solution in order to protect the doctor in the loop against responsibility derived from manipulated data, thus enabling this new paradigm to gain acceptance in the medical community.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Smith, S.W.: Humans in the loop: Human-computer interaction and security. IEEE Security & Privacy, 1, 75–79 (2003)
Lupiana, D.: Development of a framework to leverage knowledge management systems to improve security awareness (2008)
Clark, S., Goodspeed, T., Metzger, P., Wasserman, Z., Xu, K., Blaze, M.: Why (special agent) johnny (still) can’t encrypt: A security analysis of the apco project 25 two-way radio system. In: USENIX Security Symposium, Citeseer (2011)
Kieseberg, P., Hobel, H., Schrittwieser, S., Weippl, E., Holzinger, A.: Protecting Anonymity in Data-Driven Biomedical Science. In: Holzinger, A., Jurisica, I. (eds.) Interactive Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining in Biomedical Informatics. LNCS, vol. 8401, pp. 301–316. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
Randeree, E.: Secure health knowledge: Balancing security, privacy and access. In: AMCIS 2005 Proceedings, 287 (2005)
Warkentin, M., Johnston, A., Adams, A.: User interaction with healthcare information systems: Do healthcare professionals want to comply with hipaa? AMCIS 2006 Proceedings, 326 (2006)
Frühwirt, P., Kieseberg, P., Krombholz, K., Weippl, E.: Towards a forensic-aware database solution: Using a secured database replication protocol and transaction management for digital investigations. Digital Investigation 11, 336–348 (2014)
Hobel, H., Schrittwieser, S., Kieseberg, P., Weippl, E.: (Anonymity and pseudonymity in data-driven science)
Heurix, J., Zimmermann, P., Neubauer, T., Fenz, S.: A taxonomy for privacy enhancing technologies. Computers & Security (2015)
Fruehwirt, P., Kieseberg, P., Schrittwieser, S., Huber, M., Weippl, E.: Innodb database forensics: Reconstructing data manipulation queries from redo logs. In: The Fifth International Workshop on Digital Forensics (WSDF) (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kieseberg, P., Schantl, J., Frühwirt, P., Weippl, E., Holzinger, A. (2015). Witnesses for the Doctor in the Loop. In: Guo, Y., Friston, K., Aldo, F., Hill, S., Peng, H. (eds) Brain Informatics and Health. BIH 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9250. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23344-4_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23344-4_36
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23343-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23344-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)