Skip to main content

Detecting Fake Review with Rumor Model—Case Study in Hotel Review

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligence Science and Big Data Engineering. Big Data and Machine Learning Techniques (IScIDE 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 9243))

Abstract

With the development of the Internet economy, various websites accumulate numerous reviews about different products and services. Those reviews have become one major information source besides official product information, expert opinion, and automatically generated individualized advice. The survey shows that percentage of gathering buying information on Internet gradually increases by years, and the relevant researchers have also proven that consumers pay more attention to others’ reviews, thus deeply affect consumers’ shopping decision. Unfortunately, by taking advantage of such trend, some dealers manipulate reviews in order to exaggerate their own product or defame their rivals. Those behaviors have brought severe damage to consumers and commerce. This study takes Internet reviews as research object, using rumor model to detect the truth of these review. Our rumor model applied text mining technique and extract 3 major characteristic of review content: important attribute word, specific quantifier, and noun verb ratio to build the model. For testing our rumor model, we take hotel reviews on America website “TripAdvisor” and the comparison group “Fake reviews” as analysis objects. We try to automatically and easily classify true and fake reviews. The result, generated by developed model in this research, shows that the more unique vocabulary and specific quantifier and noun it contains, the less possibility it is fake.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Allport, G.W., Postman, L.: An analysis of rumor. Publ. Opin. Q. 10, 501–517 (1947)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allport, G.W., Postman, L.: The Psychology of Rumor. Henry Holt, New York (1947)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Reyes, A., Rosso, P.: Making objective decisions from subjective data: detecting irony in customer reviews. Decis. Support Syst. 53(4), 754–760 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chevalier, J.A., Mayzlin, D.: The effect of word of mouth on sales: online book reviews. J. Mark. Res. 43(3), 345–354 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cone Research. Game changer: cone survey finds 4-out-of-5 consumers reverse purchase decisions based on negative online reviews. http://www.coneinc.com/negative-reviews-online-reverse-purchase-decisions (2011)

  6. Dellarocas, C.: The digitization of word of mouth: promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Manage. Sci. 49(10), 1407–1424 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Feng, S., Banerjee, R., Choi, Y.: Syntactic stylometry for deception detection. In: Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2012), pp. 171–175, Jeju Island, Korea. ACL, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 8–14 July 2012

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fisher, D.R.: Rumoring theory and internet-a framework for analyzing the grass roots. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 16(2), 158–168 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Hu, N., Liu, L., Sambamurthy, V.: Fraud detection in online consumer reviews. Decis. Support Syst. 50, 614–626 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hu, N., Liu, L., Zhang, J.J.: Do online reviews affect product sales? The role of reviewer characteristics and temporal effects. Inf. Technol. Mgmt. 9(3), 201–214 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jindal, N., Liu, B.: Review spam detection. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 1189–1190. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jindal, N., Liu, B.: Opinion spam and analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 219–230. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lappas, T.: Fake reviews: the malicious perspective. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Applications of Natural Language Processing to Information Systems, pp. 23–34 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li, F., Huang, M., Yang, Y., et al.: Learning to identify review spam. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2011), pp. 2488–2493, Bar celona, Spain. AAAI, Palo Alto, CA, USA, 16–22 July 2011

    Google Scholar 

  15. Anderson, M., Magruder, J.: learning from the crowd: regression discontinuity estimates of the effects of an online review database. Econ. J. 122(563), 959–989 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mukherjee, A., Venkataraman, V.: What yelp fake review filter might be doing?. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, pp. 409–418. AAAI Press, Palo Alto (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ott, M., Choi, Y.J., Cardie, C., et al.: Finding deceptive opinion spam by any stretch of the imagination. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 309–319. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rownow, R.L.: On rumor. J. Commun. 24(3), 26–38 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schacter, S., Burdick, H.: A field experiment on rumor transmission and distortion. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 50, 363–371 (1955)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schultz, C.K., Luhn, H.P.: Pioneer of Information Science - Selected Works. Macmillan, London (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sernovitz, A.: Word of Mouth Marketing. Kaplan Publishing, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shibutani, T.: Improvised News: a Sociological Study of Rumor. Bobbs Merrill, Indianapolis (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Oxford Dictionary. The definition of rumor. http://oald8.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/dictionary/rumor

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming Shien Cheng .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chang, T., Hsu, P.Y., Cheng, M.S., Chung, C.Y., Chung, Y.L. (2015). Detecting Fake Review with Rumor Model—Case Study in Hotel Review. In: He, X., et al. Intelligence Science and Big Data Engineering. Big Data and Machine Learning Techniques. IScIDE 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9243. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23862-3_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23862-3_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23861-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23862-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics