Abstract
With the development of the Internet economy, various websites accumulate numerous reviews about different products and services. Those reviews have become one major information source besides official product information, expert opinion, and automatically generated individualized advice. The survey shows that percentage of gathering buying information on Internet gradually increases by years, and the relevant researchers have also proven that consumers pay more attention to others’ reviews, thus deeply affect consumers’ shopping decision. Unfortunately, by taking advantage of such trend, some dealers manipulate reviews in order to exaggerate their own product or defame their rivals. Those behaviors have brought severe damage to consumers and commerce. This study takes Internet reviews as research object, using rumor model to detect the truth of these review. Our rumor model applied text mining technique and extract 3 major characteristic of review content: important attribute word, specific quantifier, and noun verb ratio to build the model. For testing our rumor model, we take hotel reviews on America website “TripAdvisor” and the comparison group “Fake reviews” as analysis objects. We try to automatically and easily classify true and fake reviews. The result, generated by developed model in this research, shows that the more unique vocabulary and specific quantifier and noun it contains, the less possibility it is fake.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allport, G.W., Postman, L.: An analysis of rumor. Publ. Opin. Q. 10, 501–517 (1947)
Allport, G.W., Postman, L.: The Psychology of Rumor. Henry Holt, New York (1947)
Reyes, A., Rosso, P.: Making objective decisions from subjective data: detecting irony in customer reviews. Decis. Support Syst. 53(4), 754–760 (2012)
Chevalier, J.A., Mayzlin, D.: The effect of word of mouth on sales: online book reviews. J. Mark. Res. 43(3), 345–354 (2006)
Cone Research. Game changer: cone survey finds 4-out-of-5 consumers reverse purchase decisions based on negative online reviews. http://www.coneinc.com/negative-reviews-online-reverse-purchase-decisions (2011)
Dellarocas, C.: The digitization of word of mouth: promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Manage. Sci. 49(10), 1407–1424 (2003)
Feng, S., Banerjee, R., Choi, Y.: Syntactic stylometry for deception detection. In: Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2012), pp. 171–175, Jeju Island, Korea. ACL, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 8–14 July 2012
Fisher, D.R.: Rumoring theory and internet-a framework for analyzing the grass roots. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 16(2), 158–168 (1998)
Hu, N., Liu, L., Sambamurthy, V.: Fraud detection in online consumer reviews. Decis. Support Syst. 50, 614–626 (2012)
Hu, N., Liu, L., Zhang, J.J.: Do online reviews affect product sales? The role of reviewer characteristics and temporal effects. Inf. Technol. Mgmt. 9(3), 201–214 (2008)
Jindal, N., Liu, B.: Review spam detection. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 1189–1190. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2007)
Jindal, N., Liu, B.: Opinion spam and analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 219–230. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2008)
Lappas, T.: Fake reviews: the malicious perspective. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Applications of Natural Language Processing to Information Systems, pp. 23–34 (2012)
Li, F., Huang, M., Yang, Y., et al.: Learning to identify review spam. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2011), pp. 2488–2493, Bar celona, Spain. AAAI, Palo Alto, CA, USA, 16–22 July 2011
Anderson, M., Magruder, J.: learning from the crowd: regression discontinuity estimates of the effects of an online review database. Econ. J. 122(563), 959–989 (2012)
Mukherjee, A., Venkataraman, V.: What yelp fake review filter might be doing?. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, pp. 409–418. AAAI Press, Palo Alto (2013)
Ott, M., Choi, Y.J., Cardie, C., et al.: Finding deceptive opinion spam by any stretch of the imagination. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 309–319. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA (2011)
Rownow, R.L.: On rumor. J. Commun. 24(3), 26–38 (1974)
Schacter, S., Burdick, H.: A field experiment on rumor transmission and distortion. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 50, 363–371 (1955)
Schultz, C.K., Luhn, H.P.: Pioneer of Information Science - Selected Works. Macmillan, London (1968)
Sernovitz, A.: Word of Mouth Marketing. Kaplan Publishing, New York (2009)
Shibutani, T.: Improvised News: a Sociological Study of Rumor. Bobbs Merrill, Indianapolis (1966)
Oxford Dictionary. The definition of rumor. http://oald8.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/dictionary/rumor
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chang, T., Hsu, P.Y., Cheng, M.S., Chung, C.Y., Chung, Y.L. (2015). Detecting Fake Review with Rumor Model—Case Study in Hotel Review. In: He, X., et al. Intelligence Science and Big Data Engineering. Big Data and Machine Learning Techniques. IScIDE 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9243. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23862-3_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23862-3_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23861-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23862-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)