Skip to main content

How Are You Doing? Enabling Older Adults to Enrich Sensor Data with Subjective Input

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Human Behavior Understanding

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 9277))

Abstract

Technology designed to sense behavior, often neglects to directly incorporate subjective input from (elderly) users. This paper presents experiences in deploying technology that considers the elderly user and their subjective input as a way to enrich sensor data systems and empower the user. For this purpose, the paper draws on: (1) Observations of shortcomings in terms of capturing objective data from sensors as experienced in long-term deployments in the homes of older adults; (2) The design and evaluation of a wide range of applications especially designed to enable older adults to give subjective input on how they are doing, including an interactive television quiz, a talking picture frame and a tangible mood board, and (3) The development and field study of one application, the ‘Mood button’ in particular, that was tested in real-world sensing settings to work with a commercial sensing system. In doing this, this work aims to contribute towards successful sensing deployments and tools that give more control to the (elderly) end-user.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chen, L., Hoey, J., Nugent, C., Cook, D.: Sensor-based activity recognition. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C Appl. Rev. 42, 790–808 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Crabtree, A.: Wild Sociology: Ethnography and Design. Sociology Department, Lancaster University (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Storz, O., Friday, A., Davies, N., Finney, J., Sas, C., Sheridan, J.: Public ubiquitous computing systems: lessons from the e-campus display deployments. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 5, 40–47 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tilak, S.: Real-World deployments of participatory sensing applications: current trends and future directions. ISRN Sens. Netw. 2013, 8 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Groen, M., Meys, W., Veenstra, M.: Creating smart information services for tourists by means of dynamic open data. In: Proceedings of Ubicomp 2013. ACM, Zurich (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rantz, M., Skubic, M., Miller, S.: Using sensor technology to augment traditional healthcare. In: Proceedings of Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2009, pp. 6159–6162. IEEE, Minneapolis (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Froehlich, J., Kay, M., Larsen, J.E., Thomaz, E.: Workshop on Disasters in personal informatics: the unpublished stories of failure and lessons learned. In: Proceedings of Ubicomp 2014, Seattle, USA (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kanis, M., Robben, S., Hagen, J., Bimmerman, A., Wagelaar, N., Kröse, B.: Sensor monitoring in the home: giving voice to elderly people. In: Proceedings of Pervasive Health, pp. 97–100. IEEE, Venice (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Weiser, M.: The computer for the 21st century. Sci. Am. 265, 94–104 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Abowd, G., Mynatt, E.: Charting past, present, and future research in ubiquitous computing. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. (TOCHI) 7, 29–58 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Arnall, T.: No to NoUI (2013). http://www.elasticspace.com/writing

  12. Dey, A., Ljungstrand, P., Schmidt, A.: Distributed and disappearing user interfaces in ubiquitous computing. In: CHI 2001 Extended Abstracts. ACM, Seattle, Washington (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Consumer Panel Ofcom: Older people and communications technology: An attitudinal study into older people and their engagement with communications technology (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smith, A., Brenner, J.: Twitter Use 2012. Technical report. Pew Research Institute (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Eriksson, M., Niitamo, V., Kulkki, S.: State-of-the-Art in Utilizing Living Labs Approach to User-Centric ICT Innovation – A European Approach. Lulea University of Technology, Lulea (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pol, M., van Nes, F., van Hartingsveldt, M., Buurman, B., de Rooij, S., Kröse, B.: Older people’s perspectives regarding the use of sensor monitoring in their home. Gerontologist Gerontol. Soc. Am. 5, 180–181 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gravenhorst, F., Muaremi, A., Bardram, J., Grünerbl, A., Mayora, O., Wurzer, G., Frost, M., Osmani, V., Arnrich, B., Lukowicz, P., Tröster, G.: Mobile phones as medical devices in mental disorder treatment: an overview. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 19, 335–353 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kanis, M., Brinkman, W.-P., Perry, M.: Designing for positive disclosure: What do you like today? Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 39, 564–572 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Smyth, J.M.: Written emotional expression: effect sizes, outcome types, and moderating variables. J. Consul. Clin. Psychol. 66, 174–184 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Frisina, P., Borod, J., Lepore, S.: A meta-analysis of the effects of written emotional disclosure on the health outcomes of clinical populations. J. Nerv. Mental Dis. 192, 629–634 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stojmenova, E., Debevc, M., Zebec, L., Imper, B.: Assisted living solutions for the elderly through interactive TV. Multimedia Tools Appl. 66, 115–129 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mynatt, E.D., Rowan, J., Jacobs, A., Craighill, S.: Digital family portraits: Supporting peace of mind for extended family members. In: Proceedings of CHI 2001, pp. 333–340. ACM (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dibeklioğlu, H., Hortas, M.O., Kosunen, I., Zuzánek, P., Salah, A.A., Gevers, T.: Design and implementation of an affect-responsive interactive photo frame. J. Multimodal User Interfaces 4, 81–95 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Broekens, J., Brinkman, W.-P.: AffectButton: towards a standard for dynamic affective user feedback. In: Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lee, A.C.K., Tang, S.W., Yu, G.K.K., Cheung, R.T.F.: The smiley as a simple screening tool for depression after stroke: a preliminary study. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 45, 1081–1089 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Van der Geest, T.: Conducting usability studies with users who are elderly or have disabilities. Tech. Commun. 53, 23–31 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank our study participants, collaborators and colleagues, particularly Frank Kloos for their valuable contributions to this work. We thank the students from Communication and Media Design, particularly Mark Jongkind, Ron Geertsma & Marcel Stommel, and also acknowledge Patrick Post & Andranik Matshkalyan, and Amber Mollee & Rossy Lazarov for their involvement in the development and evaluation of the prototypes. This research was supported by the Blarickhof foundation, Agentschap NL (project Health-lab) and SIA (Smart Systems for Smart Services program). This research is also supported by ZonMW (EU-AAL project Care 4 Balance), COMMIT/ (VIEWW project) and HvA’s Urban Vitality program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marije Kanis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kanis, M., Robben, S., Kröse, B. (2015). How Are You Doing? Enabling Older Adults to Enrich Sensor Data with Subjective Input. In: Salah, A., Kröse, B., Cook, D. (eds) Human Behavior Understanding. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9277. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24195-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24195-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24194-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24195-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics