Skip to main content

In-App Reflection Guidance for Workplace Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Design for Teaching and Learning in a Networked World (EC-TEL 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9307))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In-app reflection guidance for workplace learning means motivating and guiding users to reflect on their working and learning, based on users’ activities captured by the app. In this paper, we present a generic concept for such in-app reflection guidance for workplace learning, its implementation in three different applications, and its evaluation in three different settings (one setting per app). From this experience, we draw the following lessons learned: First, the implemented in-app reflection guidance components are perceived as useful tools for reflective learning and their usefulness increases with higher usage rates. Second, smart technological support is sufficient to trigger reflection, however with different implemented components also reflective learning takes place on different stages. A sophisticated, unobtrusive integration in the working environment is not trivial at all. Automatically created prompts need a sensible timing in order to be perceived as useful and must not disrupt the current working processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alexiou, A., Paraskeva, F.: Enhancing self-regulated learning skills through the implementation of an e-portfolio tool. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 2, 3048–3054 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bannert, M., Reimann, P.: Supporting self-regulated hypermedia learning through prompts. Instr. Sci. 40(1), 193–211 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boud, D., Keogh, R., Walker, D.: Promoting reflection in learning: a model. In: Boud, D., Keogh, R., Walker, D. (eds.) Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning, pp. 18–40. Routledge Falmer, New York (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Daudelin, M.W.: Learning from experience through reflection. Organ. Dyn. 24(3), 36–48 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Davis, E.A.: Scaffolding students’ knowledge integration: prompts for reflection in KIE. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 22(8), 819–837 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Davis, E.A.: Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection: generic and directed prompts. J. Learn. Sci. 12(1), 91–142 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Elango, S., Jutti, R.C., Lee, L.K.: Portfolio as a learning tool: students’ perspective. Ann. Acad. Med. Singap. 34(8), 511–514 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fessl, A., Bratic, M., Pammer, V.: Continuous learning with a quiz for stroke nurses. Int. J. Technol. Enhanced Learn. 6(3), 265–275 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fessl, A., Rivera-Pelayo, V., Pammer, V., Braun, S.: Mood tracking in virtual meetings. In: Ravenscroft, A., Lindstaedt, S., Kloos, C.D., Hernández-Leo, D. (eds.) EC-TEL 2012. LNCS, vol. 7563, pp. 377–382. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Greaves, D.J., Gupta, S.K.: Portfolios can assist reflective practice and guide learning. Curr. Anaesth. Critic. Care 14, 173–177 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ho, J., Intille, S.S.: Using context-aware computing to reduce the perceived burden of interruptions from mobile devices. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 909–918. CHI 2005. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2005). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1054972.1055100

  12. Ifenthaler, D.: Determining the effectiveness of prompts for self-regulated learning in problem-solving scenarios. Educ. Technol. Soc. 15(1), 38–52 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. King, A.: Facilitating elaborative learning through guided student-generated questioning. Educ. Psychol. 27(1), 111–126 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Knipfer, K., Wessel, D., DeLeeuw, K.: D1.5 Specification of Evaluation Methodology and Research Tooling, June 2012. http://www.mirror-project.eu/research-results/downloads/finish/5/67

  15. Kunzmann, C., Schmidt, A., Attwell, G., Chan, E., Heinemann-Grüder, M., Hughes, J., Lan, W., Vratny, A., Heberle, A.: REFLECT: community-driven scaffolding for voice-enabled reflection on the go. In: 3rd Workshop on Awareness and Reflection in Technology-Enhanced Learning, CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pammer, V., Bratic, M.: Surprise, surprise: activity log based time analytics for time management. In: CHI’2013, 27 April - 2 May 2013, Paris, France (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Park, S., Lim, J.: Promoting reflective thinking process in designing e-portfolios. In: Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2007, pp. 164–168 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pejovic, V., Musolesi, M.: InterruptMe: designing intelligent prompting mechanisms for pervasive applications. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. UbiComp 2014, pp. 897–908. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Prilla, M.: Collaborative reflection support at work: A socio-technical design task. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Prilla, M., Renner, B.: Supporting collaborative reflection at work: a comparative case analysis. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on Group Work (GROUP 2014). ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Renner, B., Wesiak, G.: D10.3 Summative Evaluation of MIRROR Appsphere usage and effectiveness at test beds (2014). http://www.mirror-project.eu/research-results/deliverables/286-d103-summative-evaluation-of-mirror-appsphere-usage-and-effectiveness-at-test-beds

  22. Rivera-Pelayo, V.: Design and Application of Quantified Self Approaches for Reflective Learning in the Workplace. Ph.D. thesis, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, February 2015

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rivera-Pelayo, V., Zacharias, V., Müller, L., Braun, S.: Applying Quantified Self approaches to support reflective learning. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge. LAK 2012, pp. 111–114. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2012). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2330601.2330631

  24. Russell, J.A.: A circumplex model of affect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 39, 1161–1178 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schön, D.A.: The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think In Action, 1st edn. Basic Books, New York (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tang, C.: Reflective diaries as a means of facilitating and assessing reflection. Paper presented to the Pacific Rim Conference on Higher Education Planning and Assessment, Hilo, Hawaii, 3–7 June 2000

    Google Scholar 

  27. Thillmann, H., Kuensting, J., Wirth, J., Leutner, D.: Is it merely a question of “what” to prompt or also “when” to prompt? Z. Pädagogische Psychol. 23(2), 105–115 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Thorpe, K.: Reflective learning journals: from concept to practice. Reflective Pract. 5(3), 327–343 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Verpoorten, D., Westera, W., Specht, M.: Reflection amplifiers in online courses: a classification framework. J. Interact. Learn. Res. 21(4), 654–666 (2010). Please check and confirm the edit made in Reference [29]

    Google Scholar 

  30. Walker, S.E.: Journal writing as a teaching technique to promote reflection. J. Athletic Training 41(2), 216–221 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Xun, G., Land, S.: A conceptual framework for scaffolding iii-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 52(2), 5–22 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The project “MIRROR - Reflective learning at work” is funded under the FP7 of the European Commission (project number 257617). The Know-Center is funded within the Austrian COMET Program - Competence Centers for Excellent Technologies - under the auspices of the Austrian Federal Ministry of Transport, Innovation and Technology, the Austrian Federal Ministry of Economy, Family and Youth and by the State of Styria. COMET is managed by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency FFG. The authors thank Marina Bratic for her work with regard to the KnowSelf evaluation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela Fessl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fessl, A., Wesiak, G., Rivera-Pelayo, V., Feyertag, S., Pammer, V. (2015). In-App Reflection Guidance for Workplace Learning. In: Conole, G., Klobučar, T., Rensing, C., Konert, J., Lavoué, E. (eds) Design for Teaching and Learning in a Networked World. EC-TEL 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9307. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24258-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24258-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24257-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24258-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics