Skip to main content

Evidence-Driven Retrieval in Textual CBR: Bridging the Gap Between Retrieval and Reuse

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9343))

Abstract

The most similar case may not always be the most appropriate one to guide a problem-solving process. It is often important that a retrieved past case can be easily adapted to a target problem. The presented work deals with the retrieval and adaptation in textual case-based reasoning (TCBR) where cases are described textually. In TCBR, it is common to use similarity-based retrieval methods from information retrieval where adaptability of the retrieved cases is not considered. In this paper we introduce a novel case retrieval method called evidence-driven retrieval (EDR). It uses the notion of evidence to determine which parts of the new problem text have been useful in the past solutions and will be used in the adaptation to a new problem. This allows EDR to retrieve cases that are not only similar but also adaptable. We evaluated EDR as part of our TCBR approach that aims to support human experts in root cause analysis of transportation incidents. This approach relies on causal knowledge automatically extracted from incident reports from the Transportation Safety Board of Canada, which are used as textual cases in our experiments. The results for EDR are compared with information retrieval methods traditionally applied in TCBR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Reports from Transportation Safety board of Canada are available from http://www.tsb.gc.ca/eng/rapports-reports.

References

  1. Aamodt, A., Plaza, E.: Case-based reasoning: foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. AI Commun. 7(1), 39–59 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abedin, M.A.U., Ng, V., Khan, L.: Cause identification from aviation safety incident reports via weakly supervised semantic lexicon construction. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 38(1), 569–631 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cain, T., Pazzani, M.J., Silverstein, G.: Using domain knowledge to influence similarity judgements. In: Proceedings of the Case-Based Reasoning Workshop, pp. 191–198 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Collins, B., Cunningham, P.: Adaptation-guided retrieval in EBMT: a case-based approach to machine translation. In: Smith, I., Faltings, Boi V. (eds.) EWCBR 1996. LNCS, vol. 1168, pp. 91–104. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Dufour-Lussier, V.: Reasoning with qualitative spatial and temporal textual cases. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Lorraine (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dumais, S., Furnas, G., Landauer, T., Deerwester, S., Deerwester, S., et al.: Latent semantic indexing. In: Proceedings of the Text Retrieval Conference (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hanney, K., Keane, M.T.: Learning adaptation rules from a case-base. In: Smith, I., Faltings, Boi V. (eds.) EWCBR 1996. LNCS, vol. 1168, pp. 179–192. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Khoo, C.S.G.: Automatic identification of causal relations in text and their use for improving precision in information retrieval. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Arizona (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kireyev, K.: Semantic-based estimation of term informativeness. In: Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 530–538. Association for Computational Linguistics (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kuhn, H.W.: The Hungarian method for the assignment problem. Nav. Res. Logist. Q. 2(1–2), 83–97 (1955)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Lamontagne, L., Lee, H.-H.: Textual reuse for email response. In: Funk, P., González Calero, P.A. (eds.) ECCBR 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3155, pp. 242–256. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Leacock, C., Miller, G.A., Chodorow, M.: Using corpus statistics and WordNet relations for sense identification. Comput. Linguist. 24(1), 147–165 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Manning, C.D., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J., Bethard, S.J., McClosky, D.: The Stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. In: Proceedings of 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, pp. 55–60 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Posse, C., Matzke, B., Anderson, C., Brothers, A., Matzke, M., Ferryman, T.: Extracting information from narratives: an application to aviation safety reports. In: 2005 IEEE Aerospace Conference, pp. 3678–3690. IEEE (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rooney, J.J., Heuvel, L.N.V.: Root cause analysis for beginners. Qual. Prog. 37(7), 45–56 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shokouhi, S.V., Aamodt, A., Skalle, P., Sørmo, F.: Determining root causes of drilling problems by combining cases and general knowledge. In: McGinty, L., Wilson, D.C. (eds.) ICCBR 2009. LNCS, vol. 5650, pp. 509–523. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Sizov, G., Öztürk, P.: Query-focused association rule mining for information retrieval. In: SCAI, pp. 245–254 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sizov, G., Öztürk, P., Štyrák, J.: Acquisition and reuse of reasoning knowledge from textual cases for automated analysis. In: Lamontagne, L., Plaza, E. (eds.) ICCBR 2014. LNCS, vol. 8765, pp. 465–479. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Smyth, B., Keane, M.T.: Adaptation-guided retrieval: questioning the similarity assumption in reasoning. Artif. Intell. 102(2), 249–293 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Weber, R.O., Ashley, K.D., Brüninghaus, S.: Textual case-based reasoning. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 20(3), 255–260 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wilson, D.C., Carthy, J., Abbey, K., Sheppard, J., Dunnion, J., Drummond, A., Wang, R.: Textual CBR for incident report retrieval. In: Kumar, Vipin, Gavrilova, Marina L., Tan, CJKenneth, L’Ecuyer, Pierre (eds.) ICCSA 2003, Part I. LNCS, vol. 2667, pp. 358–367. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gleb Sizov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sizov, G., Öztürk, P., Aamodt, A. (2015). Evidence-Driven Retrieval in Textual CBR: Bridging the Gap Between Retrieval and Reuse. In: Hüllermeier, E., Minor, M. (eds) Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development. ICCBR 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9343. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24586-7_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24586-7_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24585-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24586-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics