Abstract
Companies related to safety critical systems developments invest efforts and resources to assure that their systems are safe enough. Traditionally reuse strategies have been proposed to reduce these efforts in several domains which criticality is not a key aspect. However reusing software artefacts across different domains establishes new challenges especially between safety critical systems. In fact we need to take into account different domain specific standards requirements at the same time. In this paper we present our experience on cross domain assurance involving a reuse of a software component developed for the railway domain, and to be used for the avionics domain.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Espinoza, H., Ruiz, A., Sabetzadeh, M., Panaroni, P.: Challenges for an Open and Evolutionary Approach to Safety Assurance and Certification of Safety-Critical Systems 2011, pp. 1–6 (2011)
de la Vara, J.L., Panesar-Walawege, R.K.: SafetyMet: a metamodel for safety standards. In: Moreira, A., Schätz, B., Gray, J., Vallecillo, A., Clarke, P. (eds.) MODELS 2013. LNCS, vol. 8107, pp. 69–86. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Machrouh, J., Blanquart, J.P., Baufreton, P., Boulanger, J.L., Delseny, H., Gassino, J., Ladier, G., Ledinot, E., Leeman, M., Astruc, J.M.: Cross domain comparison of system assurance. In: ERTS 2012, Toulouse, pp. 1–3 (2012)
Blanquart, J.P., Astruc, J.M., Baufreton, P., Boulanger, J.L., Delseny, H., Gassino, J., Ladier, G., Ledinot, E., Leeman, M., Machrouh, J.: Criticality categories across safety standards in different domains. In: ERTS 2012, Toulouse, pp. 1–3 (2012)
Ledinot, E., Astruc, J.-M., Blanquart, J.-P., Baufreton, P., Boulanger, J.-L., Delseny, H., Gassino, J., Ladier, G., Leeman, M., Machrouh, J., et al.: A cross-domain comparison of software development assurance standards. In: Proc. of ERTS2 (2012)
Papadopoulos, Y., McDermid, J.A.: The potential for a generic approach to certification of safety critical systems in the transportation sector. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 63(1), 47–66 (1999)
Zeller, M., Höfig, K., Rothfelder, M.: Towards a cross-domain software safety assurance process for embedded systems. In: Bondavalli, A., Ceccarelli, A., Ortmeier, F. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2014. LNCS, vol. 8696, pp. 396–400. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
Safecer Project Safety Certification of Software-Intensive Systems with Reusable Components Web: http://www.safecer.eu
RTCA DO-178/EUROCAE ED-12, Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification (2011)
IEC 61508 IEC61508, 61508 - Functional Safety of Electrical/Electronic/Programmable Electronic Safety-Related Systems. International Electrotechnical Commission (2011)
International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ISO26262 Road vehicles – Functional safety, ISO (November 2011)
CENELEC EN 50128 - Railway applications — Communication, signalling and processing systems — Software for railway control and protection systems (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ruiz, A., Larrucea, X., Espinoza, H., Aime, F., Marchand, C. (2015). An Industrial Experience in Cross Domain Assurance Projects. In: O’Connor, R., Umay Akkaya, M., Kemaneci, K., Yilmaz, M., Poth, A., Messnarz, R. (eds) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 543. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24647-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24647-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24646-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24647-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)