Skip to main content

A Tool Suite for Assurance Cases and Evidences: Avionics Experiences

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 543))

Abstract

This paper describes a specification and an implementation of a flexible tool platform for assurance and certification of safety-critical systems. This tool platform is built upon a comprehensive conceptual assurance and certification framework. This conceptual framework is composed of a common information model called CCL (Common Certification Language) and a compositional assurance approach. Our tool platform allows an easy integration with existing solutions supporting interoperability with existing development and assurance tools. The ultimate goal of our platform is to provide an integrated approach for managing assurance cases and evidences resulting from a safety project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hawkins, R., Habli, I., Kelly, T., McDermid, J.: Assurance cases and prescriptive software safety certification: A comparative study. Saf. Sci. 59, 55–71 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dodd, I., Habli, I.: Safety certification of airborne software: An empirical study. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 98(1), 7–23 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wilson, A., Preyssler, T.: Incremental certification and integrated modular avionics. In: 2008 IEEE/AIAA 27th Digital Avionics Systems Conference, pp. 1.E.3–1–1.E.3–8 (November 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vinodkumar, M.N., Bhasi, M.: A study on the impact of management system certification on safety management. Saf. Sci. 49(3), 498–507 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baumgart, S., Froberg, J., Punnekkat, S.: Towards efficient functional safety certification of construction machinery using a component-based approach. In: 2012 Third International Workshop on Product LinE Approaches in Software Engineering (PLEASE), pp. 1–4 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Defence Standard 00-56, Safety Management Requirements for Defence Systems, Issue 4, Part 1: Requirements, Ministry of Defence, Glasgow, UK (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. OMG, Structured Assurance Case Metamodel, (SACM) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Larrucea, X., Combelles, A., Favaro, J.: Safety-Critical Software [Guest editors’ introduction]. IEEE Softw. 30(3), 25–27 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Basir, N., Denney, E., Fischer, B.: Deriving Safety Cases for the Formal Safety Certification of Automatically Generated Code. Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 238(4), 19–26 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goal Structuring Notation Working Group, GSN Community Standard (November 2011). Retrieved from http://www.goalstructuringnotation.info

  11. Adelard, L.: (n.d.). Claims, Arguments and Evidence. Retrieved from http://www.adelard.com/asce/choosing-asce/cae.html

  12. OPENCOSS project, D6.2_Detailed requirements for evidence management of the OPENCOSS platform_final (November 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Denney, E., Pai, G., Pohl, J.: AdvoCATE: an assurance case automation toolset. In: Ortmeier, F., Daniel, P. (eds.) SAFECOMP Workshops 2012. LNCS, vol. 7613, pp. 8–21. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Matsuno, Y., Takamura, H., Ishikawa, Y.: A dependability case editor with pattern library. In: HASE, pp. 170–171 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Blanc, X., Gervais, M.-P., Sriplakich, P.: Model Bus: Towards the Interoperability of Modelling Tools. In: Aßmann, U., Akşit, M., Rensink, A. (eds.) MDAFA 2003. LNCS, vol. 3599, pp. 17–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Górski, J., Jarzębowicz, A., Miler, J., Witkowicz, M., Czyżnikiewicz, J., Jar, P.: Supporting assurance by evidence-based argument services. In: Ortmeier, F., Daniel, P. (eds.) SAFECOMP Workshops 2012. LNCS, vol. 7613, pp. 417–426. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. RTCA DO-178/EUROCAE ED-12, Software Considerations in Airborne System and Equipment Certification

    Google Scholar 

  18. SAE ARP4754/EUROCAE ED-79, Certification Considerations for Highly Integrated or Complex Aircraft Systems

    Google Scholar 

  19. RTCA DO-297/EUROCAE ED-124 Integrated Modular Avionics (IMA) Development Guidance and Certification Considerations

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alejandra Ruiz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ruiz, A., Larrucea, X., Espinoza, H. (2015). A Tool Suite for Assurance Cases and Evidences: Avionics Experiences. In: O’Connor, R., Umay Akkaya, M., Kemaneci, K., Yilmaz, M., Poth, A., Messnarz, R. (eds) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 543. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24647-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24647-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24646-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24647-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics