Skip to main content

Extending the Notion of Preferred Explanations for Quantified Constraint Satisfaction Problems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Theoretical Aspects of Computing - ICTAC 2015 (ICTAC 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9399))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 752 Accesses

Abstract

The Quantified Constraint Satisfaction Problem (QCSP) is a generalization of classical constraint satisfaction problem in which some variables can be universally quantified. This additional expressiveness can help model problems in which a subset of the variables take value assignments that are outside the control of the decision maker. Typical examples of such domains are game-playing, conformant planning and reasoning under uncertainty. In these domains decision makers need explanations when a QCSP does not admit a winning strategy. We extend our previous approach to defining preferences amongst the requirements of a QCSP by considering more general relaxation schemes. We also present key complexity results on the hardness of finding preferred conflicts of QCSPs under this extension of the notion of preference. This paper unifies work from the fields of constraint satisfaction, explanation generation, and reasoning under preferences and uncertainty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A relaxation of a requirement is also a requirement.

References

  1. Chen, H.: The Computational Complexity of Quantified Constraint Satisfaction. Ph.D. thesis, Cornell, August 2004

    Google Scholar 

  2. Junker, U.: Quickxplain: preferred explanations and relaxations for over-constrained problems. In: Proceedings of AAAI 2004, pp. 167–172 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Verger, G., Bessière, C.: : A bottom-up approach for solving quantified csps. In: Proceedings of CP, pp. 635–649 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gent, I.P., Nightingale, P., Stergiou, K.: QCSP-solve: a solver for quantified constraint satisfaction problems. In: Proceedings of IJCAI, pp. 138–143 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mehta, D., O’Sullivan, B., Quesada, L.: Preferred explanations for quantified constraint satisfaction problems. In: 22nd IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, ICTAI 2010, Arras, France, 27–29 October 2010, vol. 1, pp. 275–278. IEEE Computer Society (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bordeaux, L., Monfroy, E.: Beyond NP: arc-consistency for quantified constraints. In: Proceedings of CP 2002, pp. 371–386 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stynes, D., Brown, K.N.: Realtime online solving of quantified CSPs. In: Gent, I.P. (ed.) CP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5732, pp. 771–786. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferguson, A., O’Sullivan, B.: Quantified constraint satisfaction problems: from relaxations to explanations. In: Proceedings of IJCAI-2007, pp. 74–79 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brafman, R.I., Domshlak, C.: Introducing variable importance tradeoffs into CP-Nets. In: UAI, pp. 69–76 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Garey, M., Johnson, D.: Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the The Theory of NP-Completeness. W. H Freeman and Company, New York (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Scholl, C., Becker, B.: Checking equivalence for partial implementations. In: Proceedings of the 38th Design Automation Conference, DAC 2001, Las Vegas, NV, USA, June 18–22, pp. 238–243. ACM (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Miller, C., Kupferschmid, S., Lewis, M., Becker, B.: Encoding Techniques, craig interpolants and bounded model checking for incomplete designs. In: Strichman, O., Szeider, S. (eds.) SAT 2010. LNCS, vol. 6175, pp. 194–208. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Benedetti, M., Lallouet, A., Vautard, J.: QCSP made practical by virtue of restricted quantification. In: Veloso, M.M. (ed.) IJCAI 2007, Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Hyderabad, India, January 6–12 2007, pp. 38–43 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brewka, G.: Answer sets and qualitative optimization. Log. J IGPL 14(3), 413–433 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Confalonieri, R., Nieves, J.C., Osorio, M., Vázquez-Salceda, J.: Dealing with explicit preferences and uncertainty in answer set programming. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 65(2–3), 159–198 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowldedgement

This material is based upon work supported by the Science Foundation Ireland under Grant No.10/CE/I1853 and the FP7 Programme (FP7/2007–2013) under grant agreement No. 318137 (DISCUS). The Insight Centre for Data Analytics is also supported by Science Foundation Ireland under Grant No. SFI/12/RC/2289.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Quesada .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mehta, D., O’Sullivan, B., Quesada, L. (2015). Extending the Notion of Preferred Explanations for Quantified Constraint Satisfaction Problems. In: Leucker, M., Rueda, C., Valencia, F. (eds) Theoretical Aspects of Computing - ICTAC 2015. ICTAC 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9399. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25150-9_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25150-9_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25149-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25150-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics