Skip to main content

Role and Importance of Semantic Search in Big Data Governance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Big Data promise to funnel masses of data into our information ecosystems where they let flourish a yet unseen variety of information, providing us with insights yet undreamed of. However, only if we are able to organize and arrange this deluge of variety according into something meaningful to us, we can expect new insights and thus benefit from Big Data. This chapter demonstrates that text analysis is essential for Big Data governance. However, it must reach beyond keyword analysis. We need a design of semantic search for Big Data. This design has to include the individual nature of discovery and a strong focus on the information consumer. In short, it has to address self-directed information discovery. There are too many information discovery requests that cannot be addressed by mainstream Big Data technologies. Many requests often address less spectacular questions on a global scale but essentially important ones for individual information consumers. We present an open discovery language (ODL) that can completely be controlled by information consumers. ODL is a Big Data technology that embraces the agile design of discovery from the information consumer’s perspective. We want users to experiment with discovery and to adapt it to their individual needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brandt DS, Uden L (2003) Insight into mental models of novice internet searchers. Commun ACM 46(7):133–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cowie J, Lehnert W (1996) Information extraction. Commun ACM 39(1):80–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ding L, Finin T, Joshi A, Pan R, Peng Y, Reddivari P (2005) Search on the semantic web. IEEE Comput 38(10):62–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fan J, Kalyanpur A, Gondek DC, Ferrucci DA (2012) Automatic knowledge extraction from documents. IBM J Res Dev 56(3.4):5:1–5:10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gudivada VN, Baeza-Yates R, Raghavan VV (2015) Big data: promises and problems. IEEE Comput 48(3):20–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Iwanska LM (2000) Natural language is a powerful knowledge representation system: the UNO model. In: Iwanska LM, Shapiro SC (eds) Natural language processing and knowledge representation. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, pp 7–64

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lohr S (2014) Google flu trends: the limits of big data. New York Times, 28 Mar 2014

    Google Scholar 

  8. Magaria T, Hinchey M (2013) Simplicity in IT: the power of less. IEEE Comput 46(11):23–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Norman D (1987) Some observations on mental models. In: Gentner D, Stevens A (eds) Mental models. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pentland A (2013) The data-driven society. Sci Am 309(4):64–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Robertson T, Simonsen J (2012) Challenges and opportunities in contemporary participatory design. Des Issues 28(3):3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sallam R, Tapadinhas J, Parenteau J, Yuen D, Hostmann B (2014) Magic quadrant for business intelligence and analytics platforms. http://www.gartner.com/technology/reprints.do?id=1-1QYL23J&ct=140220&st=sb. Retrieved 12 June 2014

  13. Sawyer P, Rayson P, Cosh K (2005) Shallow knowledge as an aid to deep understanding in early phase requirements engineering. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 31(11):969–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tufekci Z, King B (2014) We can’t trust Uber. New York Times, 7 Dec 2014

    Google Scholar 

  15. Viaene S (2013) Data scientists aren’t domain experts. IT Prof 15(6):12–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhao H (2007) Semantic matching. Commun ACM 50(1):45–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kurt Englmeier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Englmeier, K. (2015). Role and Importance of Semantic Search in Big Data Governance. In: Trovati, M., Hill, R., Anjum, A., Zhu, S., Liu, L. (eds) Big-Data Analytics and Cloud Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25313-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25313-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25311-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25313-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics