Abstract
Formal argumentation-based dialogue systems have attracted considerable research interest in the past. Most research in this area introduce “dialectical wrappers” over argumentation formalisms to model verbal interactions amongst agents, resulting in different dialogue models for different types of dialogues, e.g. inquiry or persuasion. In this work, we take a different approach by deploying a single dialogue model for different types of dialogues, focusing in particular on information-seeking and inquiry, yet equipping agents with different (game-theoretic) strategies and different utility functions in different dialogue types. We prove that the resulting dialogue-based mechanisms implement, in dominant strategies, appropriate social choice functions for the two types of dialogues we consider. Thus, we show the feasibility of studying agents in argumentation-based dialogues in game-theoretic, mechanism design terms.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alcolea-Banegas, J.: Teaching argumentation theory and practice: the case of 12 angry men. In: Blackburn, P., van Ditmarsch, H., Manzano, M., Soler-Toscano, F. (eds.) Tools for Teaching Logic. LNCS, vol. 6680, pp. 1–8. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Black, E., Hunter, A.: An inquiry dialogue system. JAAMAS 19, 173–209 (2009)
Dung, P.M., Kowalski, R.A., Toni, F.: Assumption-based argumentation. In: Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 199–218. Springer (2009)
Fan, X., Toni, F.: Assumption-based argumentation dialogues. In: Proc. IJCAI (2011)
Fan, X., Toni, F.: Agent strategies for ABA-based information-seeking and Inquiry dialogues. In: Proc. ECAI (2012)
Fan, X., Toni, F.: Mechanism design for argumentation-based persuasion. In: Proc. COMMA. IOS Press (2012)
Fan, X., Toni, F.: A general framework for sound assumption-based argumentation dialogues. Artificial Intelligence 216, 20–54 (2014)
Jackson, M.: Mechanism theory. In: Derigs, U. (ed.) Optimization and Operations Research. EOLSS Publishers, Oxford (2003)
McBurney, P., Parsons, S.: Dialogue games for agent argumentation. In: Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 261–280. Springer (2009)
Modgil, S., Prakken, H.: The ASPIC\({}^{\text{+ }}\) framework for structured argumentation: a tutorial. Argument & Computation 5(1), 31–62 (2014)
Prakken, H.: Formal systems for persuasion dialogue. Knowledge Engineering Review 21(2), 163–188 (2006)
Toni, F.: A tutorial on assumption-based argumentation. Argument & Computation, Special Issue: Tutorials on Structured Argumentation 5(1), 89–117 (2014)
Walton, D, Krabbe, E.: Commitment in Dialogue: Basic concept of interpersonal reasoning. State University of New York Press (1995)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fan, X., Toni, F. (2015). Mechanism Design for Argumentation-Based Information-Seeking and Inquiry. In: Chen, Q., Torroni, P., Villata, S., Hsu, J., Omicini, A. (eds) PRIMA 2015: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems. PRIMA 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9387. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25524-8_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25524-8_34
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25523-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25524-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)