Skip to main content

Collaborative Judgement

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
PRIMA 2015: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems (PRIMA 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9387))

  • 1499 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper we introduce a new ranking algorithm, called Collaborative Judgement (CJ), that takes into account peer opinions of agents and/or humans on objects (e.g. products, exams, papers) as well as peer judgements over those opinions. The combination of these two types of information has not been studied in previous work in order to produce object rankings. We apply CJ to the use case of scientific paper assessment and we validate it over simulated data. The results show that the rankings produced by our algorithm improve current scientific paper ranking practice based on averages of opinions weighted by their reviewers’ self-assessments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Charlin, L., Zemel, R.S., Boutilier, C.: A framework for optimizing paper matching. CoRR, abs/1202.3706 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cormen, T.H., Stein, C., Rivest, R.L., Leiserson, C.E.: Introduction to Algorithms, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Higher Education (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. de Alfaro, L., Shavlovsky, M.: Crowdgrader: Crowdsourcing the evaluation of homework assignments. Thech. Report 1308.5273, arXiv.org (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fagin, R., Kumar, R., Mahdian, M., Sivakumar, D., Vee, E.: Comparing and aggregating rankings with ties. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, PODS ’04, pp. 47–58. ACM, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Haque, M., Egerstedt, M., Rahmani, A.: Multilevel coalition formation strategy for suppression of enemy air defenses missions. Journal of Aerospace Information Systems 10(6), 287–296 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kamvar, S.D., Schlosser, M.T., Garcia-Molina, H.: The eigentrust algorithm for reputation management in p2p networks. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW ’03, pp. 640–651. ACM, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lappas, T., Liu, K., Terzi, E.: Finding a team of experts in social networks. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD ’09, pp. 467–476. ACM, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nair, R., Tambe, M., Marsella, S.C.: Team formation for reformation in multiagent domains like RoboCupRescue. In: Kaminka, G.A., Lima, P.U., Rojas, R. (eds.) RoboCup 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2752, pp. 150–161. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Osman, N., Gutierrez, P., Sierra, C.: Trustworthy advice. Knowl.-Based Syst. 82, 41–59 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Osman, N., Sierra, C., McNeill, F., Pane, J., Debenham, J.K.: Trust and matching algorithms for selecting suitable agents. ACM TIST 5(1), 16 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Osman, N., Sierra, C., Sabater-Mir, J.: Propagation of opinions in structural graphs. In: Coelho, H., Studer, R., Wooldridge, M. (eds.) ECAI 2010–19th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Lisbon, Portugal, 16–20 August 2010. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 215, pp. 595–600. IOS Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Piech, C., Huang, J., Chen, Z., Do, C., Ng, A., Koller, D.: Tuned models of peer assessment in moocs. In: Proc. of the 6th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM 2013) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ramchurn, S.D., Farinelli, A., Macarthur, K.S., Jennings, N.R.: Decentralized coordination in robocup rescue. Comput. J. 53(9), 1447–1461 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sierra, C., Debenham, J.K.: Trust and honour in information-based agency. In: Nakashima, H., Wellman, M.P., Weiss, G., Stone, P. (eds.) 5th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2006), Hakodate, Japan, 8–12 May 2006, pp. 1225–1232. ACM (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Walsh, T.: The peerrank method for peer assessment. In: Schaub, T., Friedrich, G., O’Sullivan, B. (eds.) ECAI 2014–21st European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 18–22 August 2014, Prague, Czech Republic - Including Prestigious Applications of Intelligent Systems (PAIS 2014). Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 263, pp. 909–914. IOS Press (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wu, J., Chiclana, F., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Trust based consensus model for social network in an incompletelinguistic information context. Applied Soft Computing (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, J., Ghorbani, A.A., Cohen, R.: A familiarity-based trust model for effective selection of sellers in multiagent e-commerce systems. Int. J. Inf. Sec. 6(5), 333–344 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ewa Andrejczuk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Andrejczuk, E., Rodriguez-Aguilar, J.A., Sierra, C. (2015). Collaborative Judgement. In: Chen, Q., Torroni, P., Villata, S., Hsu, J., Omicini, A. (eds) PRIMA 2015: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems. PRIMA 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9387. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25524-8_46

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25524-8_46

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25523-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25524-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics