Skip to main content

Music Analysis by Computer: Ontology and Epistemology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Computational Music Analysis

Abstract

This chapter examines questions of what is to be analysed in computational music analysis, what is to be produced, and how one can have confidence in the results. These are not new issues for music analysis, but their consequences are here considered explicitly from the perspective of computational analysis. Music analysis without computers is able to operate with multiple or even indistinct conceptions of the material to be analysed because it can use multiple references whose meanings shift from context to context. Computational analysis, by contrast, must operate with definite inputs and produce definite outputs. Computational analysts must therefore face the issues of error and approximation explicitly. While computational analysis must retain contact with music analysis as it is generally practised, I argue that the most promising approach for the development of computational analysis is not systems to mimic human analysis, but instead systems to answer specific music-analytical questions. The chapter concludes with several consequent recommendations for future directions in computational music analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anglade, A., Benetos, E., Mauch, M., and Dixon, S. (2010). Improving music genre classification using automatically induced harmony rules. Journal of New Music Research, 39(4):349–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bent, I. (1987). Analysis. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrd, D. (1984). Music notation by computer. PhD thesis, Indiana University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrd, D. (2013). Gallery of interesting music notation. http://homes.soic.indiana.edu/donbyrd/InterestingMusicNotation.html.

  • Downie, J. S. (2008). The music information retrieval evaluation exchange (2005- 2007): A window into music information retrieval research. Acoustical Science and Technology, 29(3):247–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunsby, J. (1982). Editorial. Music Analysis, 1(1):3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goehr, L. (2007). The Imaginary Museum of Musical Works: An Essay in the Philosophy of Music. Oxford University Press, second edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, M. (2001). MusicXML for notation and analysis. In Hewlett, W. B. and Selfridge-Field, E., editors, The Virtual Score: Representation, Retrieval, Restoration, volume 12 of Computing in Musicology, pages 113–124. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N. (1976). Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. Hackett, second edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamanaka, M., Hirata, K., and Tojo, S. (2006). Implementing “A Generative Theory of Tonal Music”. Journal of New Music Research, 35(4):249–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, H. (1965). The chamber music. In Robbins Landon, H. and Mitchell, D., editors, The Mozart Companion, pages 90–137. Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, H. (1985). Functional analysis of Mozart’s G minor quintet. Music Analysis, 4(1/2):73–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerdahl, F. and Jackendoff, R. (1983). A Generative Theory of Tonal Music. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, J. (1980). What a musical work is. Journal of Philosophy, 77(1):5–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, A. (2010). Schenkerian analysis by computer: A proof of concept. Journal of New Music Research, 39(3):269–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mawer, D. (1999). Bridging the divide: embedding voice-leading analysis in string pedagogy and performance. British Journal of Music Education, 16(2):179–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • McVicar, M., Ni, Y., Santos-Rodriguez, R., and De Bie, T. (2011). Using online chord databases to enhance chord recognition. Journal of New Music Research, 40(2):139–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, D. (2007). Computing pitch names in tonal music: A comparative analysis of pitch spelling algorithms. PhD thesis, Faculty of Music, University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, D. (2012). Music analysis and Kolmogorov complexity. In Proceedings of the 19th Colloquio di Informatica Musicale (XIX CIM), Trieste, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, D. (2015). Music analysis and point-set compression. Journal of New Music Research, 44(3). In press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nattiez, J.-J. (1982). Varèse’s ‘Density 21.5’: A study in semiological music analysis. Music Analysis, 1(3):243–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nattiez, J.-J. (1990). Music and Discourse: Towards a Semiology of Music. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels, J. and Martens, J.-P. (2014). Combining musicological knowledge about chords and keys in a simultaneous chord and local key estimation system. Journal of New Music Research, 43(3):318–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, M. andWiggins, G. (2012). Auditory expectation: The information dynamics of music perception and cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4):625–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pople, A., editor (1994). Theory, Analysis and Meaning in Music. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Réti, R. (1962). The Thematic Process in Music. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Réti, R. (1967). Thematic Patterns in the Sonatas of Beethoven. Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samson, J. (1999). Analysis in context. In Cook, N. and Everist, M., editors, Rethinking Music, pages 35–54. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapp, C. (2014). 371 Four-part Chorales by J.S. Bach in the Humdrum file format. https://github.com/craigsapp/bach-371-chorales.

  • Sleator, D. and Temperley, D. (2003). The Melisma music analyzer. http://www.link.cs.cmu.edu/melisma/.

  • Sturm, B. L. (2014). The state of the art ten years after a state of the art: Future research in music information retrieval. Journal of New Music Research, 43(2):147–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temperley, D. and VanHandel, L. (2013). Introduction to the special issue on corpus methods. Music Perception, 31(1):1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Kranenburg, P. (2008). On measuring musical style—The case of some disputed organ fugues in the J. S. Bach (BWV) catalogue. Computing in Musicology, 15:120–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whorley, R. P., Wiggins, G. A., Rhodes, C., and Pearce, M. T. (2013). Multipleviewpoint systems: Time complexity and the construction of domains for complex music viewpoints in the harmonization problem. Journal of New Music Research, 42(3):237–266.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan Marsden .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marsden, A. (2016). Music Analysis by Computer: Ontology and Epistemology. In: Meredith, D. (eds) Computational Music Analysis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25931-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25931-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25929-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25931-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics