Skip to main content

Multi-diagram Representation of Enterprise Architecture: Information Visualization Meets Enterprise Information Management

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9446))

Abstract

Modeling Enterprise Architecture (EA) requires the representation of multiple views for an enterprise. This could be done by a team of stakeholders having different backgrounds. The enterprise model built by the team consists of a large number of model elements capturing various aspects of the enterprise. To deal with this high complexity, each stakeholder of the team may want to view only a certain aspect of the enterprise model of her interest. Essentially, the stakeholders need a modeling framework for their EA modeling. We devise a visual modeling language and develop a supporting tool called SeamCAD. Instead of managing a list of ill-related diagrams, the tool manages a coherent enterprise model and generates diagrams on demand, i.e. based on the stakeholders’ modeling scope and interests. The notation of the SeamCAD language was based on the Unified Modeling Language and comes with distinctive layout for the purposes of visually and explicitly showing hierarchical containment in the diagrams. We also report industrial applications of our tool and language in this paper. We position our work at the intersection of information visualization and enterprise information management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    We use an ad-hoc, self-explanatory notation in this initial representation. A regular rectangle represents either a business entity or an IT system. A rounded rectangle can be attached to a regular rectangle to represent the main service offered by the business entity or the IT system drawn under the regular rectangle. The smile symbol stands for individuals. The lines connecting these entities and individuals denote the containment hierarchy. Later on in the paper, we present the UML-based notation of our visual language.

  2. 2.

    We are of course not interested in representing the internals of human being while modeling EA.

  3. 3.

    In Sect. 4.3, we present how the last requirement is met.

  4. 4.

    www.sparxsystems.com/products/ea.

  5. 5.

    www.mega.com/en/solution/enterprise-architecture.

  6. 6.

    Homepage of Archimate www.archimate.nl.

  7. 7.

    www.archimatetool.com.

References

  1. Schekkerman, J.: How to Survive in the Jungle of Enterprise Architecture Framework: Creating or Choosing an Enterprise Architecture Framework. Trafford Publishing, Victoria (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wegmann, A.: On the systemic enterprise architecture methodology (SEAM). In: Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Angers, France, pp. 483–490 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lê, L.S., Wegmann, A.: Hierarchy-oriented modeling of enterprise architecture using reference-model of open distributed processing. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 35(3), 277–293 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wegmann, A., Lê, L.S., Regev, G., Wood, B.: Enterprise modeling using the foundation concepts of the RM-ODP ISO/ITU standard. IseB 5(4), 397–413 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. ISO/IEC 10746-1, 2, 3, 4: ITU-T Recommendation, X.901, X.902, X.903, X.904, Reference Model of Open Distributed Processing. International standard, OMG (1995–1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wegmann, A., Regev, G., Rychkova, I., Lê, L.S., de la Cruz, J.D., Julia, P.: Business-IT alignment with SEAM for enterprise architecture. In: Proceedings of 11th IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration, Annapolis, USA, pp. 111–121. IEEE Computer Society (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. ISO/IEC: Information Technology - Open Distributed Processing - Reference Model - Enterprise Language | ISO/IEC 15414 | ITU-T Recommendation X.911. SC 7 and ITU (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Porter, M.E.: Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, 1st edn. Free Press, New York (1998)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Regev, G., Gause, D.C., Wegmann, A.: Experiential learning approach for requirements engineering education. Requir. Eng. 14(4), 269–287 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dan, D.: ERP Handbook, Outil d’organisation pour l’intégration et le développement de la solution ERP DOPG Prod.com répondant aux besoins actuels et futurs des clients de DOP Gestion SA. Master’s thesis, School of Computer and Communication Sciences, EPFL (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Langenberg, K.: Designing enterprise architectures with the SEAM method - in-depth study, application and critical analysis. Master’s thesis, School of Computer and Communication Sciences, EPFL (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lankhorst, M.: Enterprise Architecture at Work - Modelling, Communication and Analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lam-Son Lê .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lê, LS. (2015). Multi-diagram Representation of Enterprise Architecture: Information Visualization Meets Enterprise Information Management. In: Dang, T., Wagner, R., Küng, J., Thoai, N., Takizawa, M., Neuhold, E. (eds) Future Data and Security Engineering. FDSE 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9446. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26135-5_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26135-5_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26134-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26135-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics