Skip to main content

Optimization of Low-Dose Tomography via Binary Sensing Matrices

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Combinatorial Image Analysis (IWCIA 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 9448))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1063 Accesses

Abstract

X-ray computed tomography (CT) is one of the most widely used imaging modalities for diagnostic tasks in the clinical application. As X-ray dosage given to the patient has potential to induce undesirable clinical consequences, there is a need for reduction in dosage while maintaining good quality in reconstruction. The present work attempts to address low-dose tomography via an optimization method. In particular, we formulate the reconstruction problem in the form of a matrix system involving a binary matrix. We then recover the image deploying the ideas from the emerging field of compressed sensing (CS). Further, we study empirically the radial and angular sampling parameters that result in a binary matrix possessing sparse recovery parameters. The experimental results show that the performance of the proposed binary matrix with reconstruction using TV minimization by Augmented Lagrangian and ALternating direction ALgorithms (TVAL3) gives comparably better results than Wavelet based Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (WOMP) and the Least Squares solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Andersen, A.H., Kak, A.C.: Simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (SART): a superior implementation of the ART algorithm. Ultrason. Imaging 6(1), 81–94 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Badea, C., Gordon, R.: Experiments with the nonlinear and chaotic behaviour of the multiplicative algebraic reconstruction technique (MART) algorithm for computed tomography. Phy. Med. Biol. 49(8), 1455–1474 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyd, S., Vandenberghe, L.: Convex Optimization. Cambridge University Press, New York (2004)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Candes, E.J.: The restricted isometry property and its implications for compressed sensing. C. R. Math. 346, 589–592 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Candes, E.J., Romberg, J.: Practical signal recovery from random projections. In: Proceedings of the SPIE Conference on Wavelet Applications in Signal and Image Processing XI, vol. 5914 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, G.H., Tang, J., Leng, S.: Prior image constrained compressed sensing (PICCS): a method to accurately reconstruct dynamic CT images from highly undersampled projection data sets. Med. Phys. 35(2), 660–663 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Daubechies, I.: Ten Lectures on Wavelets. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (1992)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Donoho, D.L.: Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 52(4), 1289–1306 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Elad, M. (ed.): Sparse and Redundant Representations: from Theory to Applications in Signal Processing. Springer, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Foucart, S., Rauhut, H.: A Mathematical Introduction to Compressive Sensing. Birkhauser, Basel (2013)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Frush, D.P., Donnelly, L.F., Rosen, N.S.: Computed tomography and radiation risks: what pediatric health care providers should know. Pediatrics 112, 951–957 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jan, J.: Medical Image Processing, Reconstruction and Restoration: Concepts and Methods. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Kak, A.C., Slaney, M.: Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Kudo, H., Suzuki, T., Rashed, E.A.: Image reconstruction for sparse-view CT and interior CT - introduction to compressed sensing and differentiated backprojection. Quant. Imaging Med. Surg. 3(3), 147–161 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li, C., Yin, W., Jiang, H., Zhang, Y.: An efficient augmented Lagrangian method with applications to total variation minimization. Comput. Optim. Appl. 56(3), 507–530 (2013)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Natterer, F.: The Mathematics of Computerized Tomography. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (2001)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Pan, X.C., Sidky, E.Y., Vannier, M.: Why do commercial CT scanners still employ traditional, filtered back-projection for image reconstruction? Inverse Prob. 25(12), 1230009 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Ritschl, L., Bergner, F., Fleischmann, C., Kachelrieß, M.: Improved total variation-based CT image reconstruction applied to clinical data. Phys. Med. Biol. 56(6), 1545–1561 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sastry, C.S., Das, P.C.: Wavelet based multilevel backprojection algorithm for parallel and fan beam scanning geometries. Int. J. Wavelets Multiresolut. Inf. Process. 4(3), 523–545 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Tropp, J.A., Gilbert, A.C.: Signal recovery from random measurements via orthogonal matching pursuit. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 53(12), 4655–4666 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., Simoncelli, E.P.: Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Proc. 13(4), 600–612 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Xu, Q., Mou, X., Wang, G., Sieren, J., Hoffman, E., Yu, H.: Statistical interior tomography. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 30(5), 1116–1128 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yu, H.Y., Wang, G.: Compressed sensing based interior tomography. Phys. Med. Biol. 54(9), 2791–2805 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yu, H.Y., Yang, J.S., Jiang, M., Wang, G.: Supplemental analysis on compressed sensing based interior tomography. Phys. Med. Biol. 54(18), N425–N432 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, H., Huang, J., Ma, J., Bian, Z., Feng, Q., Lu, H., Liang, Z., Chen, W.: Iterative reconstruction for X-ray computed tomography using prior-image induced nonlocal regularization. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 61(9), 2367–2378 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou, W., Cai, J.-F., Gao, H.: Adaptive tight frame based medical image reconstruction: a proof-of-concept study for computed tomography. Inverse Prob. 29, 125006 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

One of the authors (CSS) is thankful to CSIR (No. 25(219)/13/ EMR-II), Govt. of India, for its support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theeda Prasad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

A Appendix: Wavelet Based Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (WOMP)

A Appendix: Wavelet Based Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (WOMP)

The conventional form of orthogonal matching pursuit proposed by Troop et al. [12] is a greedy method which builds up the support set of the reconstructed sparse vector iteratively by adding one index to the current support set at each iteration. The input parameters for the conventional OMP algorithm are the measurement matrix (binary matrix) and the measurement vector. Here, we modified the existing OMP algorithm by incorporating the sparsifying transform (i.e. wavelet transform) to further sparsify the binary matrix. We call the modified algorithm as WOMP, which is given below:

Algorithm

Input Parameters: measurement matrix A, wavelet matrix W, measurement vector b, and the error threshold \(\epsilon _{0}\) Initialization: Initialize \(k=0\), and set

  • The initial solution \((Wx)^{0}=0\).

  • The initial residual \(r^{0}=b-(AW^{T})(Wx)^{0}=b\).

  • The initial solution support \(S^{0}=Support\{(Wx)^{0}\}=\phi \)

Main Iteration: Increment k by 1 and perform the following steps:

  • Sweep: Compute the errors \(\epsilon (j)=\min _{z_{j}}\Vert (a_{j} w_{j}^{T})z_{j}-r^{k-1}\Vert _{2}^{2}\) for all j using the optimal choice \(z_{j}^{*}=(a_{j}^{T} w_{j}^{T})^{T} r^{k-1}/\Vert a_{j}w_{j}^{T}\Vert _{2}^{2}\).

  • Update Support: Find a minimizer, \(j_{0}\) of \(\epsilon (j):\forall j\notin S^{k-1}, \epsilon (j_{0})\leqslant \epsilon (j)\), and update \(S^{k}=S^{k-1}\cup \{j_{0}\}\).

  • Update Provisional Solution: Compute \((Wx)^{k}\), the minimizer of \(\Vert (AW^{T}) (Wx)-b\Vert _{2}^{2}\) subject to \(Support\{(Wx)\}=S^{k}\)

  • Update Residual: Compute \(r^{k}=b-(AW^{T})(Wx)^{k}\).

  • Stopping Rule: If \(\Vert r^{k}\Vert _{2}<\epsilon _{0}\), stop. Otherwise, apply another iteration.

Output: The WOMP solution is \((Wx)^{k}\) obtained after k iterations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Prasad, T., Kumar, P.U.P., Sastry, C.S., Jampana, P.V. (2015). Optimization of Low-Dose Tomography via Binary Sensing Matrices. In: Barneva, R., Bhattacharya, B., Brimkov, V. (eds) Combinatorial Image Analysis. IWCIA 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9448. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26145-4_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26145-4_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26144-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26145-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics