Skip to main content

A Representation Theorem for Spatial Relations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
AI 2015: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9457))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1523 Accesses

Abstract

Spatial relations have been investigated in various inter-related areas such as qualitative spatial reasoning (for agents moving in an environment), geographic information science, general topology, and others. Most of the results are specific constructions of spatial relations that fulfill some required properties. Results on setting up axioms that capture the desired properties of the relations are rare. And results that characterize spatial relations in the sense that they give a complete set of axioms for the intended spatial relations still have to be presented. This paper aims at filling the gap by providing a representation theorem: It shows that there is a finite set of axioms that are fulfilled by a binary relation if and only if it can be constructed as a binary spatial relation based on a nested partition chain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    An extended version of this paper with all proofs can be found at the following URL: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/65078815/AI15representation.pdf.

References

  1. Alchourrón, C.E., Gärdenfors, P., Makinson, D.: On the logic of theory change: partial meet contraction and revision functions. J. Symbolic Logic 50, 510–530 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The semantic web. Sci. Am. 284(5), 34–43 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brennan, J., Martin, E.: Spatial proximity is more than just a distance measure. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 70, 88–106 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Düntsch, I., Vakarelov, D.: Region-based theory of discrete spaces: a proximity approach. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 49, 5–14 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Grütter, R., Scharrenbach, T., Waldvogel, B.: Vague spatio-thematic query processing: a qualitative approach to spatial closeness. Trans. GIS 14(2), 97–109 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jiang, J., Worboys, M.: Event-based topology for dynamic planar areal objects. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 23(1), 33–60 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kowalski, R.: Computational Logic and Human Thinking: How to be Artificially Intelligent. Cambridge University Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mata, F.: Geographic information retrieval by topological, geographical, and conceptual matching. In: Fonseca, F., Rodríguez, M.A., Levashkin, S. (eds.) GeoS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4853, pp. 98–113. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Naimpally, S., Warrack, B.D.: Proximity Spaces. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, vol. 59. Cambridge University Press (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Özçep, Ö.L., Grütter, R., Möller, R.: Nearness rules and scaled proximity. In: Raedt, L.D., Bessiere, C., Dubois, D. (eds.) Proceedings of ECAI 2012, pp. 636–641 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Özçep, Ö.L., Grütter, R., Möller, R.: Dynamics of a nearness relation-first results. In: Proceedings of SteDy 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Randell, D.A., Cui, Z., Cohn, A.G.: A spatial logic based on regions and connection. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conferecence on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 165–176 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smyth, M.B., Webster, J.: Discrete spatial models. In: Aiello, M., Pratt-Hartmann, I., Benthem, J. (eds.) Handbook of Spatial Logics, pp. 713–798. Springer, Netherlands (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Stell, J.G., Worboys, M.F.: Relations between adjacency trees. Theor. Comput. Sci. 412(34), 4452–4468 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Stone, M.H.: The thoery of representations for boolean algebras. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 40(1), 37–111 (1936)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Worboys, M.F.: Nearness relations in environmental space. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 15(7), 633–651 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yao, X., Thill, J.C.: How far is too far? - a statistical approach to context-contingent proximity modeling. Trans. GIS 9(2), 157–178 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Özgür Lütfü Özçep .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Özçep, Ö.L. (2015). A Representation Theorem for Spatial Relations. In: Pfahringer, B., Renz, J. (eds) AI 2015: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9457. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26350-2_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26350-2_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26349-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26350-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics