Skip to main content

Improving Document Exchanges in the Supply Chain

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 620 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 228))

Abstract

In order to help businesses to communicate fruitfully, we present a solution based on ontology alignment for integrating business documents. We focus on detecting and resolving semantic conflicts encountered during the integration process due to different terminologies used in xCBL, cXML and RosettaNet. Our contribution is to benefit from research in the ontology alignment area and considered as empirical study to test if alignment solution can overcome the heterogeneity problems between business systems. As case study, we apply alignment on purchase order ontologies, a common task of the supply chain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.xcbl.org/.

  2. 2.

    https://www.rosettanet.org/.

  3. 3.

    http://cxml.org/.

  4. 4.

    http://oaei.ontologyalignment.org.

  5. 5.

    The Levenshtein distance is the minimum number of substitutions, additions and deletions of characters required to transform one string to another.

  6. 6.

    owlapi.sourceforge.net.

References

  1. Jridi, J.E., Lapalme, G.: Adapting RosettaNet B2B standard to semantic Web technologies. In: 15th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS), Angers, France, pp. 443–450 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. RosettaNet Program Office, Overview Clusters, Segments, and PIPs, December 2011

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cardoso, J., Bussler, C.: Mapping between heterogeneous XML and OWL transaction representations in B2B integration. Data Knowl. Eng. 70(12), 1046–1069 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Schubert, P., Legner, C.: B2B integration in global supply chains: an identification of technical integration scenarios. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 20(3), 250–267 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhu, J., Pung, H.K.: Process matching: a structural approach for business process search. In: Future Computing, Service Computation, Cognitive, Adaptive, Content, Patterns, COMPUTATIONWORLD 2009, pp. 227–232, Computation World. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kim, G., Suhh, Y.: Ontology-based semantic matching for business process management. ACM SIGMIS Database 41(4), 98–118 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Glushko, R.J., McGrath, T.: Document Engineering: Analyzing and Designing Documents for Business Informatics and Web Services. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J.: Ontology matching: state of the art and future challenges. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 25(1), 158–176 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology Matching, vol. 18. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Miller, G.A.: WordNet: a lexical database for English. Commun. ACM 38(11), 39–41 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. xCBL User’s Guide Version 4.0 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ariba, cXML User’s Guide Version 1.2.025, April 2014

    Google Scholar 

  13. García, R., Gil, R.: Facilitating business interoperability from the semantic web. In: Abramowicz, W. (ed.) BIS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4439, pp. 220–232. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhdanova, A.V.: Towards a community-driven ontology matching. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Knowledge Capture, pp. 221–222. ACM (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jean-Mary, Y.R., Shironoshita, E.P., Kabuka, M.R.: Ontology matching with semantic verification. Web semant. Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 7(3), 235–251 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Khiat, A., Benaissa, M.: Aot/aotl results for oaei (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Euzenat, J., Loup, D., Touzani, M., Valtchev, P., et al.: Ontology alignment with OLA. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ISWC2004 Workshop on Evaluation of Ontology-Based Tools (EON), pp. 59–68 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hu, W., Qu, Y., Cheng, G.: Matching large ontologies: a divide-and-conquer approach. Data Knowl. Eng. 67(1), 140–160 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dragisic, Z., Eckert, K., Euzenat, J., Faria, D., Ferrara, A., Granada, R., Ivanova, V., Jiménez-Ruiz, E., Kempf, A.O., Lambrix, P., et al.: Results of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Djoufak-Kengue, J.-F., Euzenat, J., Valtchev, P., et al.: Alignement d’ontologies dirigé par la structure. In: Actes 14e journées nationales sur langages et modèles à objets (LMO), pp. 43–57 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Haller, A., Gontarczyk, J., Kotinurmi, P.: Towards a complete SCM ontology: the case of ontologising RosettaNet. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied computing, pp. 1467–1473. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jamel Eddine Jridi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jridi, J.E., Lapalme, G. (2015). Improving Document Exchanges in the Supply Chain. In: Abramowicz, W. (eds) Business Information Systems Workshops. BIS 2015. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 228. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26762-3_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26762-3_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26761-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26762-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics