Abstract
Communities on Facebook (FB) provide their members with the opportunity to express themselves freely and share personal information using anonymity. It is known that people are reluctant to discuss vis-à-vis a number of personal issues in real life, since they fear types of informal control that may be exercised on them by other people. In digital life on the contrary, anonymity is thought to ensure privacy and enforce the disclosure of the most inner thoughts, feelings and concerns without the restrictions of informal social control. In this research, we examine the case of 20 newly formed networked FB students’ communities. Although, the communities’ goal is to enable students express freely, the research shows that members’ speech is under criticism and their stated behaviors (online) are labeled according to the predominant social norms, highlighting standard types of informal social control, as well as latent types. The study is conducted by using the method of critical discourse analysis serving the creation of clear descriptive and explanatory categories, which resulted in our constructing two conceptual entity data models concerning administrators’ and users’ posts. FB communities websites not only do not meet the technical requirements regarding privacy but also new socio-technical aspects should be taken into consideration as personal information disclosure is violated. Our research indicates the necessity of new requirements that will fulfil privacy demands.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Castells, M.: The Rise of the Network Society. Blackwell Publ, Cambridge (2004)
Albert, S., Flournoy, D.M., LeBrasseur, R.: Networked Communities: Strategies for Digital Collaboration. Information Science Reference, USA (2009)
Naxakis, C.: The theology of development. Some specific thoughts about its ideological foundations. Epitheorisi Koinonikon Epistimon, vol. 95, pp. 53–68 (1998). (in Greek)
Mooney, L., Knox, D., Schacht, C.: Understanding Social Problems. Thomson Learning Inc., USA (2007)
Eriksen, T.H.: Tyranny of the Moment. Fast and Slow Time in the Information Age. Pluto Press, London (2001)
Fuchs, C.: New media, web. 2.0 and surveillance. Sociol. Compass 5(2), 134–147 (2011)
Thompson, J.B.: The Media and Modernity. Polity Press, Cambridge (1995)
Melucci, A.: Social Theory in the Information Era. Trotta Editorial, Spain (2002)
Habermas, J.: The Theory of Communicative Action: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason, vol. 2. Beacon Press, Boston (1987)
Lyon, D.: Surveillance as Social Sorting. Privacy, Risk and Digital Discrimination. Routledge, London (2003)
Barnes, S.B.: A privacy paradox: social networking in the United States. First Monday 11(9), 4 (2006)
Fuchs, C.: Social Media: a Critical Introduction. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2014)
Chomsky, N.: Media Control: The Spectacular Achievements of Propaganda. Seven Stories Press, New York (2011)
Bourdieu, P.: The forms of social capital. In: Richardson, J.G. (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, pp. 241–258. Greenwood, New York (1985)
Mitrou, L.: Law in Information Society. Sakkoulas, Athens-Thessaloniki (2002). (in Greek)
Lambropoulou, E.: Internal Security and Control Society. Kritiki, Athens (2001). (in Greek)
Chriss, J.J.: Social Control: An Introduction. Polity Press, Cambridge (2013)
Foucault, M.: Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Vintage Books, New York (1979)
Mitrou, L., Kandias, M., Stavrou, V., Gritzalis, D.; Social media profiling: a panopticon or omniopticon tool?. In: Proceedings of the 6th Biannual Surveillance and Society Conference (24–26 April 2014)
Norris, C.: From personal to digital: CCTV, the panopticon and the technological mediation of suspicion and social control. In: Lyon, D. (ed.) Surveillance and Social Sorting: Privacy Risk and Automated Discrimination, pp. 249–281. Routledge, London (2003)
Lyon, D.: The Electronic Eye: the Rise of Surveillance Society-Computers and Social Control in Context. Wiley, UK (2013)
Kandias, M., Mitrou, L., Stavrou, V., Gritzalis, D.: Which side are you on? A new panopticon vs. privacy. In: Proceedings of 2013 International Conference on Security and Cryptography (SECRYPT), Reykjavik, Iceland (29–31 July 2013)
Anleu, S.L.R.: The role of civil sanctions in social control: a socio-legal examination. Crime Prev. Stud. 9, 21–43 (1998)
Cas, I.: Ubiquitous computing, privacy and data protection: options and limitations to reconcile the unprecedented contradictions. In: Gutwirth, S., Poullet, Y., De Hert, P., Leenes, R. (eds.) Computers, Privacy and Data Protection: An Element of Choice, pp. 139–169. Springer, Netherlands (2011)
Chaidou, A.: Minors, Drugs, Social Controls. Nomiki Bibliothiki, Athens (2003). (in Greek)
Bergalli, R., Sumner, C.: Social Control and Political Order. European Perspectives at the end of the Century. Sage, UK (1997)
Ragnedda, M.: Social control and surveillance in the society of consumers. Int. J. Sociol. Anthropol. 3(6), 180–188 (2011)
Van Dijck, J.: The Culture of Connectivity: a Critical History of Social Media. Oxford University Press, UK (2013)
Viégas, F.B.: Blogger’s expectations of privacy and accountability: an initial survey. J. Comput.-Mediated Commun. 10(3), 1–31 (2005)
Norberg, P.A., Horne, D., Horne, D.: The privacy paradox: personal information disclosure intentions versus behaviors. J. Consum. Aff. 41(1), 100–126 (2007)
D’Souza, G., Phelps, J.E.: The privacy paradox: the case of secondary disclosure. Rev. Mark. Sci. 7(4), 1–29 (2009)
Solove, D.J.: A taxonomy of privacy. Law Rev. 154(3), 477–560 (2006)
Islam, M.B., Watson, J., Iannella, R., Geva, S.: What I Want for my Social Network Privacy. NICTA, Australia (2014)
Henderson, S.E.: Expectations of privacy in social media. Mississippi Coll. Law Rev. 31, 227–247 (2012)
Cohen, J.E.: What privacy is for. Harvard Law Rev. 126(7), 1904–1933 (2013)
Bauman, Z.: Globalization: The Human Consequences. Columbia University Press, New York (1998)
Ong, W.: Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. Crete University Press, Heraclion (1997). (in Greek)
Stemler, S.: An overview of content analysis. Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 7(17), 137–146 (2001)
Fairclough, N.: Critical Discourse Analysis. The Critical Study of Language. Longman, London (1995)
Van Dijk, T.A.: Ideology. A Multidisciplinary Approach. Sage, London (1998)
Gooch, G.D., Jansson, G., Mikaelsson, R.: Focus groups in Motala Ström. In: Kangur, K. (ed.) Focus Groups and Citizen Juries: River Dialogue Experiences in Enhancing Public Participation in Water Management. Peipsi Center for Transboundary Cooperation, Estonia (2005)
Hancock, B.: Trent Focus for Research and Development in Primary Health Care: an Introduction to Qualitative Research, p. 1998. Trent Focus, UK (1998)
Rogers, R.: An Introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis in Education. Lawrence Erlbaum, NJ (2004)
Delbru, R., Campinas, S., Tummarello, G.: Searching web data: an entity retrieval and high performance indexing model. J. Web Semant. 10, 33–58 (2012)
Whitley, R., Crawford, M.: Qualitative research in psychiatry. Can. J. Psychiatry 50, 108–114 (2005)
Mason, J.: Qualitative Researching. Sage, London (2002)
Vamvoukas, M.: Introduction to Pshycopaidagogic Research and Methodology. Grigoris, Athens (2002). (in Greek)
Tsiolis, G.: Methods and Techniques of Analysis in Qualitative Social Research. Kritiki, Athens (2014). (in greek)
Babbie, E.: Introduction to Social Research. Kritiki, Athens (2011). (in greek)
Han, J., Kamber, M., Pei, J.: Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann Publ, USA (2012)
Teo, P.: Racism in the news: a critical discourse analysis of news reporting in two Australian newspapers. Discourse Soc. 11(1), 7–49 (2000)
Richardson, L.: Writing Strategies: Reaching Diverse Audiences. Sage, USA (1990)
Reed, L.A., Tolman, R.M., Safyer, P.: Too close for comfort: attachment insecurity and electronic intrusion in college students’ dating relationships. Comput. Hum. Behav. 50, 431–438 (2015)
Bennett, D.C., Guran, E.I., Ramos, M.C., Margdin, G.: College students’ electronic victimization in friendships and dating relationships: anticipated distress and associations with risky behaviors. Violence Vict. 26(4), 410–429 (2011)
Nguyen, D.H., Mynatt, E.D.: Privacy mirrors: understanding and shaping socio-technical ubiquitous computing systems. Georgia Institute of Technology, technical report GIT-GVU-02-16 (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sideri, M., Kitsiou, A., Kalloniatis, C., Gritzalis, S. (2015). Privacy and Facebook Universities Students’ Communities for Confessions and Secrets: The Greek Case. In: Katsikas, S., Sideridis, A. (eds) E-Democracy – Citizen Rights in the World of the New Computing Paradigms. e-Democracy 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 570. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27164-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27164-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27163-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27164-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)