Abstract
Nowadays Twitter is used to disseminate scientific findings to the general public, and how often research articles are tweeted is a major metric in altmetrics. So it is important to understand tweet authors’ citation motivations and attitudes (or sentiments) towards the articles they cite. A content analysis approach was used to analyze 2,016 English tweets citing academic papers in the field of psychology. The results showed that most tweets (52.88%) cited articles to summarize the scientific findings of the studies. 11.81% of the tweets contained only the titles and URLs of the articles, and 19.05% of the tweets were retweets. Most tweeters held a neutral attitude towards the articles they tweeted, and only 5.15% showed negative feeling. In summary, most of the tweets do not convey in-depth critical discussion of academic papers, but they provide good access to some interesting research findings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alternative Metrics Initiative: Phase 1 White Paper. National Information Standards Organization (NISO). http://www.niso.org/apps/group_public/download.php/13809/Altmetrics_project_phase1_white_paper.pdf
Sud, P., Thelwall, M.: Evaluating altmetrics. Scientometrics 98(2), 1131–1143 (2014). doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1117-2
Galligan, F., Dyas-Correia, S.: Altmetrics: Rethinking the Way We Measure. Serials Review 39(1), 56–61 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.serrev.2013.01.003
Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C.R.: Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services. PLoS ONE 8(5), 1–7 (2013). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064841
Howard, J.: Scholars Seek Better Ways to Track Impact Online (2012). http://chronicle.com/article/As-Scholarship-Goes-Digital/130482/
Mahrt, M., Weller, K., Peters, I.: Twitter in scholarly communication. In: Weller, K., Bruns, A., Burgess, J., Mahrt, M., Puschmann, C. (eds.) Twitter and Society. Digital Formations, vol. 89, pp. 399–410. Peter Lang, New York (2014)
Eysenbach, G.: Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. Journal of Medical Internet Research 13(4) (2011). doi:10.2196/jmir.2012
Weller, K., Droge, E., Puschmann, C.: Citation analysis in twitter: approaches for defining and measuring information flows within tweets during scientific conferences. In: Making Sense of Microposts Workship, Crete, Greece (2011)
Veletsianos, G.: Higher education scholars’ participation and practices on Twitter. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 28(4), 336–349 (2012)
Ebner, M., Schiefner, M.: Microblogging−more than fun? In: Arnedillo-Sanchez, I., Isaias, P. (eds.) IADIS Mobile Learning Conference, pp. 155–159. Algarve, Portugal (2008)
Holmberg, K., Thelwall, M.: Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly communication. Scientometrics 101(2), 1027–1042 (2014)
Priem, J., Costello, K.L.: How and why scholars cite on twitter. In: Conference on ASIST, October 22–27, 2010, Pittsburgh, PA, USA (2010)
Thelwall, M., Tsou, A., Weingart, S., Holmberg, K., Haustein, S.: Tweeting Links to Academic Articles. International Journal of Scientometrics, Informetrics and Bibliometrics 17(1) (2013)
Haustein, S., Costas, R., Larivière, V.: Characterizing Social Media Metrics of Scholarly Papers: The Effect of Document Properties and Collaboration Patterns. PLOS ONE 10(3), 1–21 (2015). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120495
Shema, H., Bar-llan, J., Thelwall, M.: How Is Research Blogged? A Content Analysis Approach. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66(6), 1136–1149 (2015)
Sloan, L., Morgan, J., Burnap, P., Williams, M.: Who Tweets? Deriving the Demographic Characteristics of Age, Occupation and Social Class from Twitter User Meta-Data. PLOS ONE 10(3), 1–20 (2015). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115545
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Na, JC. (2015). User Motivations for Tweeting Research Articles: A Content Analysis Approach. In: Allen, R., Hunter, J., Zeng, M. (eds) Digital Libraries: Providing Quality Information. ICADL 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9469. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27974-9_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27974-9_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27973-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27974-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)