Skip to main content

A Real Options Model for the Disinvestment in Conventional Power Plants

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1847 Accesses

Part of the book series: Operations Research Proceedings ((ORP))

Abstract

The liberalization of the energy market and the promotion of renewables lead to difficulties in the profitable operation even of many modern conventional power plants. Although such state-of-the-art plants are highly energy-efficient, they are often underutilized or even mothballed. Decisions about further operation or shut-down of these conventional power plants are in most cases characterized as being irreversible, implying uncertainty about future rewards, and being flexible in timing. A useful approach for evaluating (dis-)investment projects with uncertainties is the real options approach (ROA) [2, 14]. This valuation technique is based on option pricing methods used in finance that have been developed by Black, Scholes, and Merton [1, 11]. In the last two decades, real options models have been widely applied to analyze investment decisions under dynamic market conditions. In recent years, however, also the analysis of disinvestment decisions considering market uncertainties has gained in importance (e.g. in studies on the agricultural and dairy sector). Moreover, ignoring disinvestment options in decision-making processes can lead to incorrect valuations of investment strategies at the firm level. In this paper, we develop a real options model for the disinvestment in conventional power plants, with the aim of determining the optimal timing for the shut-down of unprofitable power plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that the underlying asset is not a price of a traded asset (for more information see [7]).

References

  1. Black, F., Scholes, M.: The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J. Polit. Econ. 81(3), 637–654 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dixit, A.K., Pindyck, R.S.: Investment under Uncertainty. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. ON, http://www.eon.com/de/ueber-uns/struktur/asset-finder/irsching.html. Accessed 10 July 2014

  4. Fontes, D.B.M.M.: Fixed versus flexible production systems: a real options analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 188(1), 169–184 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Feil, J-H., Musshoff, O.: Investment, disinvestment and policy impact analysis in the dairy sector: a real options approach. SiAg-Working Paper 16, DFG-Forschergruppe 986, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fleten, S.-E., Näsäkkälä, E.: Gas-fired power plants: investment timing, operating flexibility and CO\(_2\) capture. Energy Econ. 32(4), 805–816 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guthrie, G.: Real Options in Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Glensk, B., Rosen, C., Madlener, R.: A Real Options Model for the Disinvestment in Conventional Power Plants. FCN Working Paper (in prep.), RWTH Aachen University (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jain, S., Roelofs, F., Oosterlee, C.W.: Valuing modular nuclear power plants in finite time decision horizon. Energy Econ. 36, 625–636 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lohwasser, R., Madlener, R.: Simulation of the European electricity market and CCS development with the HECTOR model. FCN Working Paper No. 6/2009, RWTH Aachen University, November (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Merton, R.C.: Theory of rational option pricing. Bell J. Econ. Manag. Sci. 4(1), 141–183 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mun, J.: Real Options Analysis: Tools and Techniques for Valuing Strategic Investment and Decisions. Wiley, Hoboken (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Musshoff, O., Odening, M., Schade, C., Maart-Noelck, S.C., Sandri, S.: Inertia in disinvestment decisions: experimental evidence. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 40(3), 463–485 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schwartz, E.S., Trigeorgis, L.: Real Options and Investment under Uncertainty: Classical Readings and Recent Contributions. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christiane Rosen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Glensk, B., Rosen, C., Madlener, R. (2016). A Real Options Model for the Disinvestment in Conventional Power Plants. In: Lübbecke, M., Koster, A., Letmathe, P., Madlener, R., Peis, B., Walther, G. (eds) Operations Research Proceedings 2014. Operations Research Proceedings. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28697-6_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics