Skip to main content

Integration of Prospect Theory into the Outranking Approach PROMETHEE

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1886 Accesses

Part of the book series: Operations Research Proceedings ((ORP))

Abstract

Outranking methods as a specific application of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) are applied to structure complex decision problems as well as to elicitate the decision makers preferences. Therefore, a consideration of behavioral effects within outranking-methods seems to be meaningful. Several behavioral effects and biases have been identified in previous studies, however, only few approaches exist to consider such behavioral issues within the application of MCDA-methods explicitly. The prospect theory developed by Kahneman and Tversky (1979) represents one of the most prominent theories from behavioural decision theory. Their findings concerning the decision behaviour of humans, e.g. loss aversion or reference dependency, are broadly supported and confirmed through a variety of empirical research. Hence, the aim of the presented paper is to integrate these elements from prospect theory within the outranking approach PROMETHEE. For that purpose, an additional discrete reference alternative is incorporated. A case study concerning the sustainable usage of biomass for energy conversion illustrates the new developed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abdellaoui, M., Bleichrodt, H., Paraschiv, C.: Loss aversion under prospect theory: a parameter-free measurement. Manage. Sci. 53, 1659–1674 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bleichrodt, H., Schmidt, U., Zank, H.: Additive utility in prospect theory. Manage. Sci. 55, 863–873 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bozkurt, A.: Multi-criteria decision making with interdependent criteria using prospect theory. Masterthesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara (2007). http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12608408/index.pdf

  4. Brans, J.P., Vincke, Ph., Mareschal, B.: How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 24, 228–238 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eigner-Thiel, S., Schmehl, M., Ibendorf, J., Geldermann, J.: Assessment of different bioenergy concepts in terms of sustainable development. In: Ruppert, H., et al. (eds.) Sustainable Bioenergy Production—An Integrated Approach, pp. 339–384. Springer, Berlin (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Geldermann, J., Eigner-Thiel, S., Schmehl, M., Ibendorf, J.: Multikriterielle Entscheidungsunterstützung bei der Auswahl von Biomassenutzungskonzepten. Presented at the conference Chancen und Risiken der Bioenergie im Kontext einer nachhaltigen Entwicklung. 24–25 January 2012, Göttingen, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  7. Geldermann, J., Rentz, O.: Multi-criteria analysis for the assessment of environmentally relevant installations. J. Ind. Ecol. 9, 127–142 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Heath, C., Larrick, R.P., Wu, G.: Goals as reference points. Cogn. Psychol. 38, 79–109 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47, 263–292 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Korhonen, P., Moskowitz, H., Wallenius, J.: Choice behavior in interactive multiple-criteria decision making. Ann. Oper. Res. 23, 161–179 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lerche, N., Geldermann, J.: Integration of prospect theory into PROMETHEE—a case study concerning sustainable bioenergy concepts. Int. J. Multicriteria Decis. Making—Special Issue on New Developments in PROMETHEE Methods (under review)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Loss aversion in riskless choice: a reference-dependent model. Q. J. Econ. 106, 1039–1061 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5, 297–323 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, J.-Q., Sun, T.: Fuzzy multiple criteria decision making method based on prospect theory. Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering, pp. 288–291. IEEE, Xian (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is funded by a grant of the Ministry of Science and Culture of Lower Saxony and Volkswagenstiftung. It is part of the joint research project Sustainable use of bioenergy: bridging climate protection, nature conservation and society with a duration from 2009 till 2014.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nils Lerche .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lerche, N., Geldermann, J. (2016). Integration of Prospect Theory into the Outranking Approach PROMETHEE. In: Lübbecke, M., Koster, A., Letmathe, P., Madlener, R., Peis, B., Walther, G. (eds) Operations Research Proceedings 2014. Operations Research Proceedings. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28697-6_51

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics