Skip to main content

Using Social Networking Tools for Teaching and Learning: A Perspective of University Lecturers and Students

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
E-Learning, E-Education, and Online Training (eLEOT 2015)

Abstract

The use of online social networking tools (SNTs) has become commonplace within higher education. In this paper a definition and a typology of educational affordance of social networking service (SNS) are presented. The paper also explores the educational affordances whilst examining how university lecturers and students use SNTs to support their educational activities. The data presented here were obtained through a survey in which 38 participants from three universities took part; two universities in Uganda and one in the United Kingdom. The results show that Facebook is the most popular tool with 75 % of participants having profiles. Whilst most participants perceived the educational significance of these tools, social affordances remain more pronounced compared to pedagogical and technological affordances. The limitations of this study have also been discussed.

This study was part of a doctoral research (in its second year) exploring adoption of social collaborative e-learning in higher education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 72.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Du, Z., Fu, X., Zhao, C., Liu, Q., Liu, T.: Interactive and collaborative E-Learning platform with integrated social software and learning management system. In: Wei, L., Cai, G., Liu, W., Xing, W. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Information Technology and Software Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mozhaeva, G., Feshchenko, A., Kulikov, I.: E-learning in the Evaluation of Students and Teachers: LMS or Social Networks? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 152, 127–130 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mazer, J.P., Murphy, R.E., Simonds, C.J.: I’ll see you on “Facebook”: The effects of computer-mediated teacher self-disclosure on student motivation, affective learning, and classroom climate. Commun. Educ. 56(1), 1–17 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Idris, Y., Wang, Q.: Affordances of Facebook for learning. Int. J. Continuing Eng. Educ. Life Long Learn. 19(2), 247–255 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McLoughlin, C., Lee, M. J.: Social software and participatory learning: pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. In: ICT: Providing Choices for Learners and Learning. Proceedings Ascilite Singapore (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tess, P.A.: The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual) – A literature review. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(5), A60–A68 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Martin, S., Diaz, G., Sancristobal, E., Gil, R., Castro, M., Peire, J.: New technology trends in education: seven years of forecasts and convergence. Comput. Educ. 57(3), 1893–1906 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dzulkefli, Z.M.S., Sin, N.M.: Selection of web 2.0 technologies and teaching practices among lecturers in selected malaysia higher education institutions. In: 2012 IEEE Colloquium on Humanities, Science & Engineering Research. IEEE Press, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Robertson, J.: The educational affordances of blogs for self-directed learning. Comput. Educ. 57(2), 1628–1644 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Day, D., Lloyd, M.M.: Affordances of online technologies: More than the properties of the technology. Aust. Educ. Comput. 22(2), 17–21 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gibson, J.: The concept of affordances. Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing, pp. 67–82 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cheung, C.M.K., Chiu, P.Y., Lee, M.K.O.: Online social networks: Why do students use facebook? Comput. Hum. Behav. 27(4), 1337–1343 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li, C.: Social technographics, in Mapping Participation. In: Activities Forms The Foundation of A Social Strategy. sl: Forrester. (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. O’Reilly, T.: What is web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Price, K.: Web 2.0 and education: What it means for us all. In: Australian Computers in Education Conference (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francis Otto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Cite this paper

Otto, F., Williams, S., Lundqvist, K.Ø. (2016). Using Social Networking Tools for Teaching and Learning: A Perspective of University Lecturers and Students. In: Vincenti, G., Bucciero, A., Vaz de Carvalho, C. (eds) E-Learning, E-Education, and Online Training. eLEOT 2015. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 160. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28883-3_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28883-3_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28882-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28883-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics