Skip to main content

Risk Factors Relationships for Information Systems Projects – Insight from Polish Public Organizations

  • Conference paper
Information Technology for Management

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 243))

Abstract

The aims of this study are to identify risk factors affecting information system (IS) projects in public organizations in Poland and find contextual interactions among these factors. This study is based on a critical review of literature, practical collaboration, case studies, logical deduction, and experts’ judgments. In order to explore relationships between identified factors, Interpretive Structural Modeling methodology was used. The study results show eleven risk factors affecting IS projects in public organizations, namely (1) Top management support, (2) Manage processes in organization, (3) Involve IS end-users, (4) Manage information system development process, (5) Make system requirement analysis, (6) Manage project plan, (7) Manage, monitor and evaluate project, (8) Manage project team, (9) Manage team experience, (10) Manage team communication and (11) Manage public sector procedures and processes. Based on the relationships between them, the linkage, dependent and independent factors are identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Barros, M.O., Werner, C.M.L., Travassos, G.H.: Supporting risks in software project management. J. Syst. Softw. 70(1–2), 21–35 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nelson, R.R.: IT project management: infamous failure, classic mistakes, and best practices. MIS Q. Executive 6(2), 67–78 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Charette, R.N.: Why software fails. IEEE Spectr. 42(9), 42–49 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bock, K., Trück, S.: Assessing uncertainty and risk in public sector investment projects. Technol. Invest. 2, 105–123 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou, L., Vasconcelos, A., Nunes, M.: Supporting decision making in risk management through an evidence-based information systems project risk checklist. Inf. Manag. Comput. Secur. 16(2), 166–186 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dey, P.K., Kinch, J., Ogunlana, S.O.: Managing risk in software development projects: a case study. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 107(2), 284–303 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jiang, J.J., Klein, G., Discenza, R.: Information system success as impacted by risks and development strategies. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 48(1), 46–55 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jani, A.: Escalation of commitment in troubled IT projects: influence of project risk factors and self-efficacy on the perception of risk and the commitment to a failing project. Int. J. Project Manag. 29, 934–945 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Keil, M., Wallace, L., Turk, D., Dixon-Randall, G., Nulden, U.: An investigation of risk perception and risk propensity on the decision to continue a software development project. J. Syst. Softw. 53(2), 145–157 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tesch, D., Kloppenborg, T.J., Frolick, M.N.: IT project risk factors: the project management professional’s perspective. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 47(4), 61–69 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Patanakul, P.: Managing large-scale IS/IT projects in the public sector: problems and causes leading to poor performance. J. High Technol. Manag. Res. 25, 21–35 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Aritua, B., Smith, N.J., Bower, D.: What risks are common to or amplified in programmes: evidence from UK public sector infrastructure schemes. Int. J. Project Manag. 29, 303–312 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Whittaker, B.: What went wrong? unsuccessful information technology projects. Inf. Manag. Comput. Secur. 7(1), 23–30 (1999)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Baccarini, D., Salm, G., Love, P.E.D.: Management of risks in information technology projects. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 104(4), 286–295 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wateridge, J.: IT projects: a basis for success. Int. J. Project Manag. 13(3), 169–172 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yildiz, M.: E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Gov. Inf. Q. 24(3), 646–665 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kliem, R., Ludin, I.: Reducing Project Risk. Gower Publishing Limited, Aldershot (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cadle, J., Yeate, D.: Project Management for Information Systems. Financial Times/Prentice-Hall, Harlow (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zwikael, O., Pathak, R.D., Singh, G., Ahmed, S.: The moderating effect of risk on the relationship between planning and success. Int. J. Project Manag. 32, 435–441 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McGaughey Jr., R., Snyder, C., Carr, H.H.: Implementing information technology for competitive advantage: risk management issues. Inf. Manag. 26(5), 273–280 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jugdev, K., Perkins, D., Fortune, J., White, D., Walker, D.: An exploratory study of project success with tools, software and methods. Int. J. Manag. Projects Bus. 6(3), 534–551 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rabechini Junior., R., Monteiro de Carvalho, M.: Understanding the impact of project risk management on project performance: an empirical study. J. Technol. Manag. Innov. 8, 64–78 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Raz, T., Michael, E.: Use and benefit of tools for project risk management. Int. J. Project Manag. 19(1), 9–17 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nalewaik, A.: Risk management for pharmaceutical project schedules. AACE Int. Trans. 7, 71–75 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Das, T.K., Teng, B.S.: Managing risks in strategic alliances. Acad. Manag. Executive 13(4), 50–62 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cook, P.: Formalized risk management: vital tool for project- and business-success. Cost Eng. 47(8), 12–13 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Holzmann, V., Spiegler, I.: Developing risk breakdown structure for information technology organizations. Int. J. Project Manag. 29, 537–546 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Keil, M., Cule, P., Lyytinen, K., Schmidt, R.: A framework for identifying software project risks. Commun. ACM 41(11), 76–83 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. López, J.C., Salmeron, L.: Risks response strategies for supporting practitioners decision-making in software projects. Procedia Technol. 5, 437–444 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu, S., Wang, L.: Understanding the impact of risks on performance in internal and outsourced information technology projects: the role of strategic importance. Int. J. Project Manag. 32, 1494–1510 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jun, L., Qiuzhen, W., Qingguo, M.: The effects of project uncertainty and risk management on IS development project performance: a vendor perspective. Int. J. Project Manag. 29, 923–933 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dey, P.K., Clegg, B.T., Bennett, D.J.: Managing enterprise resource planning projects. Bus. Process Manag. J. 16(2), 282–296 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Attri, R., Dev, N., Sharma, V.: Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) approach: an overview. Res. J. Manag. Sci. 2(2), 3–8 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mishra, R.P., Kodali, R.B., Gupta, G., Mundra, N.: Development of a framework for implementation of world-class maintenance systems using Interpretive Structural Modeling approach. Procedia CIRP 26, 424–429 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Barve, A., Kanda, A., Shankar, R.: Analysis of interaction among the barriers of third party logistics. Int. J. Agile Syst. Manag. 2(1), 109–129 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Luthra, S., Garg, D., Haleem, A.: An analysis of interactions among critical success factors to implement green supply chain management towards sustainability: an Indian perspective. Resour. Policy 46, 37–50 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2014.12.006i

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yadav, D.K., Barve, A.: Analysis of critical success factors of humanitarian supply chain: an application of Interpretive Structural Modeling. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 12, 213–225 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Venkatesh, V.G., Rathi, S., Patwa, S.: Analysis on supply chain risks in Indian apparel retail chains and proposal of risk prioritization model using Interpretive structural modeling. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 26, 153–167 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sage, A.: Interpretive Structural Modeling: Methodology for Large Scale Systems. McGraw-Hill, New York (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Govindan, K., Palaniappan, M., Zhu, Q., Kannan, D.: Analysis of third party reverse logistics provider using Interpretive Structural Modeling. Int. J. Product. Econ. 140, 204–211 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ziemba, E., Kolasa, I.: Risk factors framework for information systems projects in public organizations – insight from Poland. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference, vol. 5, pp. 1575–1583 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research has been supported by a grant entitled “Transformation of business and public administration by information technology and information systems” from the University of Economics in Katowice, Poland, 2014–2016.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ewa Ziemba .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ziemba, E., Kolasa, I. (2016). Risk Factors Relationships for Information Systems Projects – Insight from Polish Public Organizations. In: Ziemba, E. (eds) Information Technology for Management. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 243. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30528-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30528-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30527-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30528-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics