Skip to main content

Influence and Sentiment Homophily on Twitter Social Circles

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Complex Networks VII

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 644))

Abstract

Web-based social relations mirror several known phenomena identified by Social Sciences, such as Homophily. Social circles are inferable from those relations and there are already solutions to find the underlying sentiment of social interactions. We present an empirical study that combines existing Graph Clustering and Sentiment Analysis techniques for reasoning about Sentiment dynamics at cluster level and analyzing the role of social influence on sentiment contagion, based on a large dataset extracted from Twitter during the 2014 FIFA World Cup. Exploiting WebGraph and LAW frameworks to extract clusters, and SentiStrength to analyze sentiment, we propose a strategy for finding moments of Sentiment Homophily in clusters. We found that clusters tend to be neutral for long ranges of time, but denote volatile bursts of sentiment polarity locally over time. In those moments of polarized sentiment homogeneity there is evidence of an increased, but not strong, chance of one sharing the same overall sentiment that prevails in the cluster to which he belongs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Medical study about cardiovascular disease—https://www.framinghamheartstudy.org/.

  2. 2.

    https://stream.twitter.com/1.1/statuses/filter.json.

  3. 3.

    http://webgraph.di.unimi.it/.

  4. 4.

    http://law.di.unimi.it/software.php.

References

  1. Bakshy, E., Hofman, J.M., Mason, W.A., Watts, D.J.: Everyone’s an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter. In: Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. WSDM ’11, pp. 65–74. ACM, NY (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bakshy, E., Rosenn, I., Marlow, C., Adamic, L.: The role of social networks in information diffusion. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web. WWW ’12, pp. 519–528. ACM, NY (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boldi, P., Rosa, M., Santini, M., Vigna, S.: Layered label propagation: a multiresolution coordinate-free ordering for compressing social networks. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web. WWW ’11, pp. 587–596. ACM, NY (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boldi, P., Vigna, S.: The webgraph framework I: compression techniques. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on World Wide Web. WWW ’04, pp. 595–602. ACM, NY (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bollen, J., Gonçalves, B., Ruan, G., Mao, H.: Happiness is assortative in online social networks. Artif. Life 17(3), 237–251 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., Gummadi, K.P.: Measuring user influence in twitter: the million follower fallacy. In: ICWSM ’10: Proceedings of international AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Conover, M., Gonçalves, B., Ratkiewicz, J., Flammini, A., Menczer, F.: Predicting the political alignment of twitter users. In: SocialCom/PASSAT, pp. 192–199. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Easley, D., Kleinberg, J.: Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning About a Highly Connected World. Cambridge University Press, NY (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fan, R., Zhao, J., Chen, Y., Xu, K.: Anger is more influential than joy: sentiment correlation in weibo. PLoS ONE 9(10), e110184 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fowler, J., Christakis, N.: Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the framingham heart study. Br. Med. J. 337, a2338 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gruzd, A., Doiron, S., Mai, P.: Is happiness contagious online? A case of twitter and the 2010 winter olympics. In: Proceedings of the 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. HICSS ’11, pp. 1–9. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hodeghatta, U.R.: Sentiment analysis of hollywood movies on twitter. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining. ASONAM ’13, pp. 1401–1404. ACM, NY (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Huberman, B., Romero, D., Wu, F.: Social networks that matter: twitter under the microscope. First Monday 14(1) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Krippendorff, K.: Computing krippendorff’s alpha reliability. Technical report, University of Pennsylvania, Annenberg School for Communication (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Leskovec, J., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J.: Signed networks in social media. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ’10, pp. 1361–1370. ACM, NY (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mcauley, J., Leskovec, J.: Discovering social circles in ego networks. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data 8(1), 4:1–4:28 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Newman, M.: Networks: An Introduction. Oxford University Press Inc, NY (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sakaki, T., Okazaki, M., Matsuo, Y.: Earthquake shakes twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web. WWW ’10, pp. 851–860. ACM, NY (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shalizi, C.R., Thomas, A.C.: Homophily and contagion are generically confounded in observational social network studies (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tang, J., Chang, Y., Liu, H.: Mining social media with social theories: a survey. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 15(2), 20–29 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tang, J., Gao, H., Hu, X., Liu, H.: Exploiting homophily effect for trust prediction. In: Proceedings of the Sixth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. WSDM ’13, pp. 53–62. ACM, NY (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Thelwall, M.: Homophily in myspace. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 60(2), 219–231 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Thelwall, M.: Emotion homophily in social network site messages. First Monday 15(4) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., Paltoglou, G.: Sentiment strength detection for the social web. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 63(1), 163–173 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partly supported by national funds through Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT), under projects EXCL/EEI-ESS/0257/2012 and UID/CEC/50021/2013.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hugo Lopes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lopes, H., Pinto, H.S., Francisco, A.P. (2016). Influence and Sentiment Homophily on Twitter Social Circles. In: Cherifi, H., Gonçalves, B., Menezes, R., Sinatra, R. (eds) Complex Networks VII. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 644. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30569-1_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30569-1_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30568-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30569-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics