Skip to main content

A Service-Oriented Living Lab for Continuous Performance Improvement in SMEs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 2422 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 247))

Abstract

The convergence of globalization and digitalization has thoroughly transformed the business environment. Therefore, enterprises need a user-centered and open-innovation ecosystem to promote the value co-creation process in order to perform better than their rivals. This paper presents a service-oriented approach for designing a Living Lab for continuous performance improvement in enterprises, especially small-and-medium-size enterprises (SMEs). The proposed Living Lab is an on-going project for the creation of a living laboratory that will support the upgrading program for SMEs in developing countries. The purpose of this Living Lab is to integrate the co-creation and experimentation of innovative ideas and performance improvements in real-life use cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. MIT Living Labs: Products, places, and experiences that respond to a changing world. http://livinglabs.mit.edu

  2. Pallot, M.: The Living Lab Approach: A User Centred Open Innovation Ecosystem. Webergence Blog (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vargo, S.L., Maglio, P.P., Akaka, M.A.: On value and value co-creation: a service systems and service logic perspective. Eur. Manage. J. 26, 145–152 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chesbrough, H.: Open innovation: a new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. In: Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., West, J. (eds.) Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, pp. 1–12. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nystrom, A.-G., Leminen, S.: Living lab - a new form of business network. In: 2011 17th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising (ICE), pp. 1–10 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Santoro, R.: Interview with the former President of ENOLL, 12 February 2010

    Google Scholar 

  7. Veeckman, C., Lievens, B., Schuurman, D., De Moor, S.: The impact of the organizational set-up of Living Labs on the innovation process: a case study between different living lab approaches in flanders. In: ISPIM Conference Proceedings, The International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM), pp. 1–16 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eriksson, M., Niitamo, V.-P., Kulkki, S.: State-of-the-art in utilizing Living Labs approach to user-centric ICT innovation-a European approach. Lulea Cent. Distance-Spanning Technol. Lulea Univ. Technol. Swed. Lulea (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., Eriksson, C.I., Ståhlbröst, A., Svensson, J.: A milieu for innovation–defining living labs. In: 2nd ISPIM Innovation Symposium, New York, pp. 6–9 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Almirall, E., Lee, M., Wareham, J.: Mapping living labs in the landscape of innovation methodologies. Technol. Innov. Manage. Rev. 2(9), 12–18 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., Nyström, A.-G.: Living labs as open-innovation networks. Technol. Innov. Manage. Rev. 2(9), 6–11 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schuurman, D., Marez, L.D., Ballon, P.: Open innovation processes in living lab innovation systems: insights from the LeYLab. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 3(11), 28–36 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eschenbaecher, J., Turkama, P., Thoben, K.-D.: Choosing the best model of Living Lab collaboration for companies. In: eChallenges, pp. 1–9. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. The Nature of Managerial Work: Prentice Hall College Division. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Penrose, E.T.: The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Möller, K.: Role of competences in creating customer value: a value-creation logic approach. Ind. Mark. Manage. 35, 913–924 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hirsch-Kreinsen, H., Jacobson, D., Robertson, P.L.: Low-tech industries: innovativeness and development perspectives—a summary of a european research project. Prometheus 24, 3–21 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Reboud, S., Mazzarol, T., Soutar, G.: Low-tech vs high-tech entrepreneurship: a study in France and Australia. J. Innov. Econ. Manag. 14, 121–141 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kilpatrick, S., Crowley, S.: Learning and Training: Enhancing Small Business Success. ERIC (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Curtin, P., Stanwick, J., Beddie, F.: Fostering Enterprise: The Innovation and Skills Nexus–Research Readings. ERIC (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lehmann, Valerie, Frangioni, Marina, Dubé, Patrick: Living lab as knowledge system: an actual approach for managing urban service projects? J. Knowl. Manage. 19, 1087–1107 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dubé, P., Sarrailh, J., Billebaud, C., Grillet, C., Zingraff, V., Kostecki, I.: Le livre Blanc des Living Labs. In: Umvelt Service Design, p. 133. Montréal (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Svensson, J.: Living Lab Principles-Supporting Digital Innovation. Int. Soc. Prof. Innov. Manag. ISPIM. 1–11 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Damanpour, F.: Organizational size and innovation. Organ. Stud. 13, 375–402 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Business Council of Australia: Innovation Study Commission: Managing the Innovating Enterprise: Australian Companies Competing with the World’s Best. Business Library in association with the Business Council of Australia, Melbourne (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Michela, J.L., Noori, H., Jha, S.: The dynamics of continuous improvement. Int. J. Qual. Sci. 1, 19–47 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Harrington, H.J.: Continuous versus breakthrough improvement: finding the right answer. Bus. Process Re-Eng. Manage. J. 1, 31–49 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kanji, G.K.: Measurement of business excellence. Total Qual. Manag. 9, 633–643 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dixon, J.R., Nanni, A.J., Vollman, T.E.: The New Performance Challenge: Measuring Operations for World Class Competition. Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chang, H.H.: The influence of continuous improvement and performance factors in total quality organization. Total Qual. Manage. Bus. Excell. 16, 413–437 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Le Duc, T.: L’impact des connaissances en technologie d’information des dirigeants sur le succès du système d’information des PME: une étude empirique au Vietnam. Clermont-Ferrand 1 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Aarnio, T.: The strengthened business process matrix–a novel approach for guided continuous improvement at service-oriented SMEs. Knowl. Process Manage. 22, 180–190 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Le Dinh, T., Thi, T.T.: Collaborative business service modelling and improving: an information-driven approach. In: Lee, I. (ed.) Trends in E-Business, E-Services, and E-Commerce: Impact of Technology on Goods, Services, and Business Transactions, pp. 128–147. Business Science Reference, Hershey (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Qu’est-ce qu’un Living Lab? Montréal InVivo. http://www.montreal-invivo.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/livre-blanc-LL-Umvelt-Final-mai-2014.pdf

  35. Sarjanen, S., others: Living Lab-Discovering the Essence (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Stahlbrost, A.: Forming future IT the living lab way of user involvement. Luleå Univ. Technol. (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Spohrer, J., Maglio, P.P., Bailey, J., Gruhl, D.: Steps toward a science of service systems. IEEE Comput. 40, 71–77 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Bititci, U.S., Carrie, A.S., Devitt, L.M.: Integrated performance measurement systems: a development guide. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage. 17, 522–534 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thang Le Dinh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Le Dinh, T., Vu, M.C., Phan, TC., Nomo, S.T. (2016). A Service-Oriented Living Lab for Continuous Performance Improvement in SMEs. In: Borangiu, T., Dragoicea, M., Nóvoa, H. (eds) Exploring Services Science. IESS 2016. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 247. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32689-4_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32689-4_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32688-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32689-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics