Abstract
In the context of service innovation, the question of when to assess a new service by customer and how to achieve personalized assessment are yet to be explored. This is especially true under the situations of uncertainty when it comes to bringing the effectiveness of new service’s promotion and decision making, i.e., for service provider to attain service competitiveness and for potential service customer to decide whether to try the new service. Accordingly, an appropriate expectation positioning method proposed in this study aims to collect and analyze psychological information from potential service customer in order to make service promotion decisions capable of achieving service provider’s purpose as well as satisfying service customer, utilizing Cumulative Prospect Theory.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Heskett, J.L., Schlesinger, L.A.: Putting the service-profit chain to work. Harv. Bus. Rev. 72, 164–174 (1994)
Prochaska, J.O. Johnson, S., Lee, P: The transtheoretical model of behavior change. In: The Handbook of Health Behavior Change (Second Edition), vol. 12, pp. 38–48 (1998)
Patten, S., Vollman, A., Thurston, W.: The utility of the transtheoretical model of behavior change for HIV risk reduction in injection drug users. J. Assoc. Nurses AIDS Care 11(1), 57–66 (2000)
Prochaska, J., DiClemente, C., Norcross, J.: In search of how people change: applications to addictive behaviors. J. Addict. Nurs. 47(9), 1002–1114 (1992)
Stanovich, K.E., West, R.F.: Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate? Behav. Brain Sci. 23, 645–665 (2000)
Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertain. 5, 297–323 (1992)
Bandura, A., McClelland, D.C.: Social Learning Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1977)
Kahneman, D.: Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York (2011)
Johnson, S.P., Menor, L.J., Roth, A.V., Chase, R.B.: A critical evaluation of the new service development process: integrating service innovation and service design. In: Fitzsimmons, J.A., Fitzsimmons, M.J. (eds.) New Service Development Creating Memorable Experiences, pp. 1–32. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2000)
Farquhar, P.: Utility assessment methods. Manage. Sci. 30, 1283–1300 (1984)
Keeney, R., Raiffa, H.: Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Wiley, New York (1976)
Krzysztofowicz, R., Duckstein, L.: Assessment errors in multiattribute utility functions. Organ. Behav. Individ. Perform. 26(3), 326–348 (1980)
Quiggin, J.: Subjective utility, anticipated utility, and the allais paradox. Organ. Behav. Individ. Decis. Process. 35(1), 94–101 (1985)
Gonzalez, R., Wu, G.: On the shape of the probability weighting function. Cogn. Psychol. 38, 129–166 (1999). organizational behavior and individuals decision processes
Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. J. Econometric Soc. 47, 263–291 (1979)
DiClemente, C.C., Prochaska, J.O.: Toward a comprehensive, transtheoretical model of change: stages of change and addictive behaviors. Plenum Press (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yuan, ST.D., Wang, HY. (2016). New Service’s Expectation Positioning by Applying Cumulative Prospect Theory. In: Borangiu, T., Dragoicea, M., Nóvoa, H. (eds) Exploring Services Science. IESS 2016. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 247. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32689-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32689-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32688-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32689-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)