Skip to main content

Semantics for Social Media

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Future and Emergent Trends in Language Technology (FETLT 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9577))

  • 541 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper we present four experiments on the analysis Italian social media texts using a linguistically-based semantic approach. The experiments are respectively: two on newspaper articles about two political crises, one on a twitter corpus centered on political themes, and one on a case study of strategic plan programs of candidates to the presidency of our university. The analyses carried out by the same system, focus on semantic features of texts highlighting three main traits: “factivity” or factuality, “subjectivity” and polarity. The system uses semantic knowledge derived from deep linguistic analysis at propositional level to classify texts at a fine-grained level. As will be shown in the paper, linguistically-based semantic information allows for neat distinction of writing styles when comparing newspapers writing styles, for irony detection in tweets, and in different degrees, for making readability judgements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    www.corriere.it, www.liberoquotidiano.it, www.repubblica.it.

  2. 2.

    Final overall results are available online, http://www.slideshare.net/vivianapatti9/evalita-sentipolc14.

References

  1. Bagga, A., Pustejovsky, J., Zadrozny, W. (eds.): Syntactic and Semantic Complexity in Natural Language Processing Systems: NAACL-ANLP 2000 Workshop. Association for Computational Linguistics, New Brunswick (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Basile, V., Bolioli, A., Nissim, M., Patti, V., Rosso, P.: Overview of the Evalita 2014 SENTIment POLarity Classification Task. In: Proceedings of EVALITA 2014, Pisa (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bos, J., Delmonte, R. (eds.): Semantics in Text Processing (STEP), Research in Computational Semantics, vol. 1. College Publications, London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Esuli, A., Sebastiani, F.: SentiWordNet: a publicly available lexical resource for opinion mining. In: Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation LREC 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Delmonte, R.: Computational Linguistic Text Processing - Logical Form, Logical Form, Semantic Interpretation, Discourse Relations and Question Answering. Nova Science Publishers, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Delmonte, R., Tonelli, S., Tripodi, R.: Semantic processing for text entailment with VENSES. In: TAC 2009 Proceedings Papers (2010). http://www.nist.gov/tac/publications/2009/papers.html

  7. Delmonte, R.: Computational Linguistic Text Processing - Lexicon, Grammar, Parsing and Anaphora Resolution. Nova Science Publishers, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Delmonte, R.: Predicate argument structures for information extractionfrom dependency representations: null elements are missing, 2013. In: Lai, C., Giuliani, A., Semeraro, G. (eds.) DART 2012: Revised and Invited Papers. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 515, pp. 25–49. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Delmonte, R., Gifu, D., Tripodi, R.: Opinion and factivity analysis of Italian political discourse. In: Basili, R., Sebastiani, F., Semeraro, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th Italian Information Retrieval Workshop, IIR 2013, Pisa. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org), vol. 964, pp. 88–99 (2013). http://ceur-ws.org

  10. Delmonte, R., Pallotta, V.: Opinion mining and sentiment analysis need text understanding. Advances in Distributed Agent-based Retrieval Tools. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, pp. 81–95. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Delmonte R., Pianta, E.: IMMORTALE - Analizzatore Morfologico, Tagger e Lemmatizzatore per l’Italiano. In: Atti V Convegno AI*IA “Cibernetica e Machine Learning”, pp. 19–22. Napoli (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Delmonte, R., Pianta, E.: Immortal: how to detect misspelled from unknown words. In: BULAG, PCUF, pp. 193–218. Besanon (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Delmonte, R.: Italian lemmatization by rules with getaruns. In: Magnini, B., Cutugno, F., Falcone, M., Pianta, E. (eds.) EVALITA 2011. LNCS, vol. 7689, pp. 239–248. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. DuBay, W.H.: The Principles of Readability. Impact Information, Costa Mesa (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Heilman, M., Collins-Thompson, K., Eskenazi, M.: An analysis of statistical models and features for reading difficulty prediction. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications. Columbus (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Heilman, M., Collins-Thompson, K., Callan, J., Eskenazi, M.: Combining lexical and grammatical features to improve readability measures for first and second language texts. In: HLT-NAACL 2007, pp. 460–467. Association for Computational Linguistics, Rochester (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kim, S.-M., Hovy, E.: Determining the sentiment of opinions. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2004), pp. 1367–1373 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kao, J., Dan, J.: A computational analysis of style, affect, and imagery in contemporary poetry. In: NAACL Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Literature (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Feng, L., Jansche, M., Huenerfauth, M., Elhadad, N.: A comparison of features for automatic readability assessment. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2010), Beijing (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pang, B., Lee, L.: A sentimental education: sentiment analysis using subjectivity summarization based on minimum cuts. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pp. 271–278 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pennebaker, J.W., Booth, R.J., Francis, M.E.: Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC). http://www.liwc.net/

  22. Petersen, S.E., Ostendorf, M.: A machine learning approach to reading level assessment. Comput. Speech Lang. 23, 86–106 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Polanyi, L., Zaenen, A.: Contextual valence shifters. In: Wiebe, J. (ed.) Computing Attitude and Affect in Text: Theory and Applications, pp. 1–10. Springer, Dordrecht (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Pollack, M., Pereira, F.: Incremental interpretation. Artif. Intell. 50, 37–82 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Pollard, S., Biermann, A.W.: A measure of semantic complexity for natural language systems. In: Bagga et al. Proceedings of the 2000 NAACL-ANLP Workshop on Syntactic and semantic complexity in natural language processing systems, vol. 1, pp. 42–46 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Reyes, A., Rosso, P., Buscaldi, D.: From humor recognition to irony detection: the figurative language of social media. Data Knowl. Eng. 74, 1–12 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Reyes, A., Rosso, P.: On the difficulty of automatically detecting irony: beyond a simple case of negation. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 40(3), 595–614 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Roark, B., Mitchell, M., Hollingshead, K.: Syntactic complexity measures for detecting mild cognitive impairment. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on BioNLP 2007: Biological, Translational, and Clinical Language Processing, BioNLP 2007, pp. 1–8. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Saur, R., Pustejovsky, J.: Are you sure that this happened? Assessing the factuality degree of events in text. Comput. Linguist. 38(2), 261–299 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Taboada, M., Brooke, J., Tofiloski, M., Voll, K., Stede, M.: Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis. Comput. Linguist. 37(2), 267–307 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Turney, P.D., Littman, M.L.: Inference of semantic orientation from association. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. (TOIS) 21(4), 315–346 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tonelli, S., Manh, K.T., Pianta, E.: Making readability indices readable. In: Proceedings NAACL-HLT 2012 Workshop on Predicting and Improving Text Readability for target reader populations, pp. 40–48. Montral (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wiebe, J., Wilson, T., Cardie, C.: Annotating expressions of opinions and emotions in language. Lang. Resour. Eval. 39(2), 165–210 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodolfo Delmonte .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Delmonte, R., Tripodi, R. (2016). Semantics for Social Media. In: Quesada, J., Martín Mateos, FJ., Lopez-Soto, T. (eds) Future and Emergent Trends in Language Technology. FETLT 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9577. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33500-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33500-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33499-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33500-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics