Skip to main content

PADRE: A Method for Participatory Action Design Research

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Tackling Society's Grand Challenges with Design Science (DESRIST 2016)

Abstract

Action Design Research (ADR) is a Design Research (DR) method that enriches the Design Science Research (DSR) paradigm, by providing stages and principles for designing artifacts and allowing for their emergence in an organizational context. The method has been used and elaborated by scholars, extending the mode of the method and its stages, incorporating and adopting knowledge from related approaches such as Participatory Action Research (PAR) and Participatory Design (PD). In this paper, we have adopted principles and philosophy from PAR and PD to extend and elaborate the ADR method, by providing a front-end of Action Research (AR) that emphasizes learning through incremental iteration. We will introduce our elaborated method as Participatory Action Design Research (PADRE) and demonstrate how we have used it in our own research. We argue that the ADR method can benefit from incorporating learning within and across each and every stage iteratively. We also argue that learning can be used as a learning nexus, which informs and gets accumulated for formalization of learning that can be re-used within different cycles of ADR. Hence, we introduce PADRE and provide a model that consists of a set of key-components, which extends and elaborates the ADR method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28(1), 75–105 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Indulska, M., Recker, J.C.: Design science in IS research: a literature analysis. In: ANU Workshop on Information Systems Foundation (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Venable, J.R.: The role of theory and theorising in design science research. In: Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alturki, A., Gable, G.G.: Theorizing in design science research: an abstraction layers framework. In: Proceedings of PACIS (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gregor, S., Jones, D.: The anatomy of a design theory. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 8, 312 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kuechler, B., Vaishnavi, V.: On theory development in design science research: anatomy of a research project. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 17(5), 489–504 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Walls, J., Widmeyer, G.R., El Sawy, O.A.: Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Inf. Syst. Res. 3(1), 36–59 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. March, S.T., Smith, G.F.: Design and natural science research on information technology (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Markus, L.M., Majchrzak, A., Gasser, L.: A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes. MIS Q. 26(3), 179–212 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sein, M.K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., Lindgren, R.: Action design research. MIS Q. 35(1), 37–56 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Haj-Bolouri, A., Flensburg, P., Bernhardsson, L., Winman, T., Svensson, L.: Designing a web-based education platform for swedish civic orientation. In Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare and Higher Education (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Haj-Bolouri, A., Svensson, L.: Designing for heterogeneous groups of end-users: towards a nascent design theory. In: Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare and Higher Education (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haj-Bolouri, A., Bernhardsson, L., Bernhardsson, P.: CollaborGeneous: a framework of collaborative IT-tools for heterogeneous groups of learners. In: Donnellan, B., Helfert, M., Kenneally, J., VanderMeer, D., Rothenberger, M., Winter, R. (eds.). LNCS, vol. 9073, pp. 376–380. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Haj-Bolouri, A., Bernhardsson, L., Bernhardsson, P., Svensson, L.: An information systems design theory for adaptable e-learning. In: 49th Proceedings on Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Swantz, M.L.: Participatory action research as practice. The Sage Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, pp. 31–48. Sage, London (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Rahman, A.: Some trends in the praxis of participatory action research. In: The Sage Handbook of Action Research. Sage, London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pretty, J., Gujit, I., Thompson, J., Scones, I.: Participatory Learning and Action: A Trainer’s Guide. IIED, London (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mullarkey, M.T., Hevner, A.R.: Entering action design research. In: Donnellan, B., Helfert, M., Kenneally, J., VanderMeer, D., Rothenberger, M., Winter, R. (eds.). LNCS, vol. 9073, pp. 121–134. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bilandzic, M., Venable, J.: Towards a participatory action design research: adapting action research and design science research methods for urban informatics. J. Community Inform. (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Coenen, T., Mostmans, L., Naessens, K.: MuseUs: case study of a pervasive cultural heritage serious game. ACM J (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tate, M., Furtmueller, E.: Service development as action design research: reporting on a servitized e-recruiting portal. In: SIGSVC Workshop, International Conference on Information Systems (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rosson, M.B., Carroll, J.M.: Developing an online community for women in computer and information sciences: a design rationale analysis. Trans. HCI 5, 6–27 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lempinen, K., Tuunainen, V.K.: Redesigning the supplier reporting process and system in public procurement: case Hansel. Int. J. Organ. Eng. 1, 331–346 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Maccani, G., Donnellan, B., Helfert, M.: Action design research in practice: the case of smart cities. In: Tremblay, M.C., VanderMeer, D., Rothenberger, M., Gupta, A., Yoon, V. (eds.) DESRIST 2014. LNCS, vol. 8463, pp. 132–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Sjöström, J.: Designing Information Systems: A Pragmatic Account. Uppsala University, Uppsala (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: Design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24, 45–77 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kensing, F.: Methods and Practices in Participatory Design. IT University Press, Copenhagen (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schuler, D., Namioka, A.: Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Baskerville, R., Pries-Heje, J., Venable, J.: A risk management framework for design science research. In: 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Science, Kauai, Hawaii, USA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Whyte, W.H.: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. The Conservation Foundation (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Argyris, C., Schön, D.A.: Participatory action research and action science compared: a commentary. Am. Behav. Sci. 32(5), 612–623 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir Haj-Bolouri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Haj-Bolouri, A., Bernhardsson, L., Rossi, M. (2016). PADRE: A Method for Participatory Action Design Research. In: Parsons, J., Tuunanen, T., Venable, J., Donnellan, B., Helfert, M., Kenneally, J. (eds) Tackling Society's Grand Challenges with Design Science. DESRIST 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9661. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39294-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39294-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39293-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39294-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics