Skip to main content

Cognitive Tutors Produce Adaptive Online Course: Inaugural Field Trial

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 4097 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 9684))

Abstract

We hypothesize that when cognitive tutors are integrated into online courseware, the online courseware can provide a new type of adaptive instructions, such as impasse-driven adaptive remediation and need-based assessments. As a proof of concept, we have developed an adaptive online course on the Open Learning Initiative (OLI) platform by integrating four new instances of cognitive tutors into an existing OLI course. Cognitive tutors were created with an innovative cognitive tutor authoring system called Watson. To evaluate the effectiveness of the adaptive online course, a quasi-experiment was conducted in a gateway course at Carnegie Mellon University. The results show that the proposed adaptive online course technology is robust enough to be used in actual classroom with mixed effect for learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Reid, P.: Categories for barriers to adoption of instructional technologies. Educ. Inf. Technol. 19(2), 383–407 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bascow, L.S., et al.: Barriers to Adoption of Online Learning Systems in U.S. Higher Education. ITHAKA S+R, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Griffiths, R., et al.: Interactive Online Learning on Campus: Testing MOOCs and Other Platforms in Hybrid Formats in the University System of Maryland. ITHAKA S+R, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Parthasarathy, M., Smith, M.A.: Valuing the institution: an expanded list of factors influencing faculty adoption of online education. Online J. Distance Learn. Adm. 12(2), 9 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Thille, C., Smith, J.: The Open Learning Initiative: Cognitively Informed E-Learning. The Observatory on Borderless Higher Education, London (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gannon-Cook, R., et al.: Motivators and inhibitors for university faculty in distance and e-learning. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 40(1), 149–163 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Koedinger, K.R., Corbett, A.T., Perfetti, C.: The knowledge-learning-instruction framework: bridging the science-practice chasm to enhance robust student learning. Cogn. Sci. 36, 757–798 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bier, N., Strader, R., Zimmaro, D.: An approach to skill mapping in online courses. In: Learning with MOOCs, Cambridge, MA (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. EGA: Learning to Adapt: A Case for Accelerating Adaptive Learning in Higher Education. Education Growth Advisors, Boston (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ritter, S., et al.: Cognitive tutor: applied research in mathematics education. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 14(2), 249–255 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Corbett, A.T.: Cognitive computer tutors: solving the two-sigma problem. In: Bauer, M., Gmytrasiewicz, P.J., Vassileva, J. (eds.) UM 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2109, pp. 137–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Beck, J.E., Gong, Y.: Wheel-spinning: students who fail to master a skill. In: Lane, H., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., Pavlik, P. (eds.) AIED 2013. LNCS, vol. 7926, pp. 431–440. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Matsuda, N., Chandrasekaran, S., Stamper, J.: How quickly can wheel spinning be detected? In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Data Mining (under review)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Matsuda, N., Cohen, W.W., Koedinger, K.R.: Teaching the teacher: tutoring SimStudent leads to more effective cognitive tutor authoring. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 25, 1–34 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Muggleton, S.: Inductive logic programming. New Gener. Comput. 8(4), 295–318 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Koedinger, K.R., Mathan, S.: Distinguishing qualitatively different kinds of learning using log files and learning curves. In: Working Notes of the ITS 2004 Workshop on Analyzing Student-Tutor Interaction Logs to Improve Educational Outcomes (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The research reported here was supported by National Science Foundation Award No. DRL-1418244.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noboru Matsuda .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Matsuda, N. et al. (2016). Cognitive Tutors Produce Adaptive Online Course: Inaugural Field Trial. In: Micarelli, A., Stamper, J., Panourgia, K. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9684. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39583-8_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39583-8_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39582-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39583-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics