Skip to main content

Modeling and Simulation of Sectarian Tensions in Split Communities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1022 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9708))

Abstract

We present a simple agent-based model for the evolution of between-group attitudes (measured on a linear scale) in a community that is divided between two distinct social groups (which may be distinguished by religion, ethnicity, etc.). We derive approximate analytical equations to predict the change in mean attitudes over time given certain assumptions. The model predicts that social pressures cause each group to tend towards extremes of hostility or acceptance towards the other group. Under some conditions, groups can have stable extremist and moderate factions, but very small changes in system parameters can upset the stability. Interpersonal cohesion (the degree to which individuals influence each other’s opinions) plays a significant role in controlling within-group polarization. We show that strategies to improve intergroup relations that target subsets of each group are much less effective when cohesion is low.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Thron, C., McCoy, R.: Affinity and Hostility in Divided Communities: A Mathematical Model (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2687353

  2. Dixon, J.: What causes civil wars? Integrating quantitative research findings. Int. Stud. Rev. 11(4), 707–735 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Epstein, J.M.: Modeling civil violence: an agent-based computational approach. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99(suppl. 3), 7243–7250 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Luo, L., Chakraborty, N., Sycara, K.: An evolutionary game-theoretic model for ethno-religious conflicts between two groups. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 17(4), 379–401 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Lorenz, J.: Continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence: A survey. Int. J. Mod. Phy. C 18(12), 1819–1838 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Selliaas, A.: Can sport start reconciliation between peoples and states in conflict? Play the Game Conference, Reykjavik (2007). (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6cqn7foAI)

  7. Thron, C.: Affinity/Hostility in Divided Communities, Version 1. CoMSES Computational Model Library (2015). https://www.openabm.org/model/4780/version/1

  8. Putnam, R.D.: Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster, New York (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Thron .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Thron, C., McCoy, R. (2016). Modeling and Simulation of Sectarian Tensions in Split Communities. In: Xu, K., Reitter, D., Lee, D., Osgood, N. (eds) Social, Cultural, and Behavioral Modeling. SBP-BRiMS 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9708. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39931-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39931-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39930-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39931-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics