Abstract
Terrorism aims to cause the psychological instability in the targeted population. Social psychological research through traditional methods, like surveys or interviews, have provided insights for understanding the psychological effects of such traumatic events. However, these studies are costly and usually are reported with a significant delay after the events. With the allure of social media, we are provided with a unique opportunity to gather timely psychological signals from publicly available Twitter data. In this study, we collected more than 4 million tweets from 16 K Paris users. We present our analysis of the immediate emotional response as well as the subsequent recovery process following the Paris attacks. Our analysis shows that, immediately after the attacks, a greater level of anxiety was associated with locations closer to the attack site. Users’ emotional shift gradually returned to the pre-impact status over days to weeks, while the emotional trajectories vary with the degrees of users’ social interactions. The analysis further reveals a significant impact of media exposure on the recovery process. This study provides both theoretical and practical implications for understanding users’ emotional vulnerability and resilience concerning mass violence events.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beevers, C.G., Hixon, J.G.: Individual differences in stress physiology: understanding person by situation influences (2011)
Sutton, J., Palen, L., Shklovski, I.: Backchannels on the front lines: emergent uses of social media in the 2007 southern California wildfires. In: Proceedings of ISCRAM (2008)
Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., Poblete, B.: Information credibility on twitter. In: WWW (2011)
Caragea, C., Squicciarini, A., Stehle, S., et al.: Mapping moods: geo-mapped sentiment analysis during hurricane sandy. In: Proceedings of ISCRAM (2014)
Lin, Y.-R., Margolin, D.: The ripple of fear, sympathy and solidarity during the boston bombings. EPJ Data Sci. 3(1), 31 (2014)
Panzer, A.M., Butler, A.S., et al.: Preparing for the Psychological Consequences of Terrorism: A Public Health Strategy. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. (2003)
Rodriguez-Llanes, J.M., Vos, F., et al.: Measuring psychological resilience to disasters: are evidence-based indicators an achievable goal. Environ. Health 12, 115 (2013)
Bonanno, G.A., Brewin, C.R., Kaniasty, K., La Greca, A.M.: Weighing the costs of disaster consequences, risks, and resilience in individuals, families, and communities. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 11(1), 1–49 (2010)
Silver, R.C., Holman, E.A., McIntosh, D.N., Poulin, M., et al.: Nationwide longitudinal study of psychological responses to September 11. Jama 288(10), 1235–1244 (2002)
Schlenger, W.E., Caddell, J.M., Ebert, L., et al.: Psychological reactions to terrorist attacks: findings from the national study of Americans’ reactions to September 11. Jama 288(5), 581–588 (2002)
Cohen, S., Wills, T.A.: Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol. Bull. 98(2), 310 (1985)
Helgeson, V.S.: Social support and quality of life. Qual. Life Res. 12(1), 25–31 (2003)
Thomas, M., Tsai, C.I.: Psychological distance and subjective experience: how distancing reduces the feeling of difficulty. J. Consum. Res. 39(2), 324–340 (2012)
Saslow, L.R., McCoy, S., et al.: Speaking under pressure: low linguistic complexity is linked to high physiological and emotional stress reactivity. Psychophysiology 51(3), 257–266 (2014)
Lin, Y.-R., Margolin, D., Keegan, B., Lazer, D.: Voices of victory: a computational focus group framework for tracking opinion shift in real time. In: WWW (2013)
Coppersmith, G., Dredze, M., Harman, C.: Quantifying mental health signals in twitter. In: ACL (2014)
Pennebaker, J.W., Francis, M.E., Booth, R.J.: Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC 2001. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahway (2001)
De Choudhury, M., Gamon, M., Counts, S., Horvitz, E.: Predicting depression via social media. In: ICWSM (2013)
Cohn, M.A., Mehl, M.R., Pennebaker, J.W.: Linguistic markers of psychological change surrounding September 11, 2001. Psychol. Sci 15(10), 687–693 (2004)
Bunney, B.S.: The psychological aftermath of disasters
Slatcher, R.B., Chung, C.K., Pennebaker, J.W., Stone, L.D.: Winning words: individual differences in linguistic style among us presidential and vice presidential candidates. J. Res. Pers. 41(1), 63–75 (2007)
Curran, P.J., Obeidat, K., Losardo, D.: Twelve frequently asked questions about growth curve modeling. J. Cogn. Dev. 11(2), 121–136 (2010)
Zheng, Z., Pavlou, P.A., Bin, G.: Latent growth modeling for information systems: theoretical extensions and practical applications. ISR 25(3), 547–568 (2014)
Keogh, E., Hatton, K., Ellery, D.: Avoidance versus focused attention and the perception of pain: differential effects for men and women. Pain 85(1), 225–230 (2000)
Cohen, S., McKay, G.: Social support, stress and the buffering hypothesis: a theoretical analysis. Handb. Psychol. Health 4, 253–267 (1984)
Pak, A., Paroubek, P.: Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wen, X., Lin, YR. (2016). Sensing Distress Following a Terrorist Event. In: Xu, K., Reitter, D., Lee, D., Osgood, N. (eds) Social, Cultural, and Behavioral Modeling. SBP-BRiMS 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9708. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39931-7_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39931-7_36
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39930-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39931-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)