Skip to main content

Recognizing Unseen Gym Activities from Streaming Data - Accelerometer Vs. Electromyogram

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence, 13th International Conference

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 474))

Abstract

Wearable sensors based activity recognition is a research area where mostly inertial measurement unit based information is used to recognize human activities. Commonly the approaches are based on accelerometer data while in this study the potential of electromyogram signals in activity recognition is studied. The actual research problem tackled is one of the major drawbacks in activity recognition, namely to add completely new activities in real life to the recognition models. In this study, it was shown that in gym settings electromyogram signals clearly outperforms the accelerometer data in recognition of completely new sets of gym movements from streaming data even though the sensors would not be positioned directly to the muscles trained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Myo. https://www.myo.com/ (accessed: October 30, 2015)

  2. Banos, O., Damas, M., Pomares, H., Prieto, A., Rojas, I.: Daily living activity recognition based on statistical feature quality group selection. Expert Systems with Applications 39(9), 8013–8021 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bulling, A., Blanke, U., Schiele, B.: A tutorial on human activity recognition using body-worn inertial sensors. ACM Comput. Surv. 46(3), 33:1–33:33 (2014). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2499621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang, K., Chen, M., Canny, J.: Tracking free-weight exercises. In: UbiComp 2007: Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 19–37 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng, H., Sun, F., Griss, M., Davis, P., Li, J., You, D.: Nuactiv: recognizing unseen new activities using semantic attribute-based learning. In: Proceeding of the 11th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, MobiSys 2013, pp. 361–374. ACM, New York (2013). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2462456.2464438

  6. Devijver, P.A., Kittler, J.: Pattern recognition: A statistical approach, vol. 761. Prentice-Hall, London (1982)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E., Stork, D.G.: Pattern classification. John Wiley & Sons (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Holviala, J., Kraemer, W., Sillanpää, E., Karppinen, H., Avela, J., Kauhanen, A., Häkkinen, A., Häkkinen, K.: Effects of strength, endurance and combined training on muscle strength, walking speed and dynamic balance in aging men. European Journal of Applied Physiology 112(4), 1335–1347 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-2089-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Koskimäki, H.: Avoiding bias in classification accuracy - a case study for activity recognition. In: IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (2015) (accepted)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Koskimäki, H., Huikari, V., Siirtola, P., Laurinen, P., Röning, J.: Activity recognition using a wrist-worn inertial measurement unit: a case study for industrial assembly lines. In: The 17th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, pp. 401–405 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Koskimäki, H., Siirtola, P.: Recognizing gym exercises using acceleration data from wearable sensors. In: 2014 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (CIDM), pp. 321–328. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Morris, D., Saponas, T., Guillory, A., Kelner, I.: Recofit: using a wearable sensor to find, recognize, and count repetitive exercises. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Muehlbauer, M., Bahle, G., Lukowicz, P.: What can an arm holster worn smart phone do for activity recognition?. In: 15th Annual International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC), pp. 79 – 82 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Peng, H., Long, F., Ding, C.: Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 27(8), 1226–1238 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Siirtola, P.: Recognizing human activities based on wearable inertial measurements: methods and applications. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Oulu (Acta Univ Oul C 524) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Siirtola, P., Koskimäki, H., Huikari, V., Laurinen, P., Röning, J.: Improving the classification accuracy of streaming data using sax similarity features. Pattern Recognition Letters 32(13), 1659–1668 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stiefmeier, T., Roggen, D., Tröster, G., Ogris, G., Lukowicz, P.: Wearable activity tracking in car manufacturing. IEEE Pervasive Computing 7(2), 42–50 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, M., Sawchuk, A.A.: Human daily activity recognition with sparse representation using wearable sensors. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 17(3), 553–560 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heli Koskimäki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Koskimäki, H., Siirtola, P. (2016). Recognizing Unseen Gym Activities from Streaming Data - Accelerometer Vs. Electromyogram. In: Omatu, S., et al. Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence, 13th International Conference. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 474. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40162-1_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40162-1_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40161-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40162-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics