Skip to main content

Voluntary Play in Serious Games

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Games and Learning Alliance (GALA 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9599))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Voluntariness is an important feature of games. Serious game designers intend to generate engaging gameplay, which implies that voluntary play should be equally important for serious games as for entertainment games. This paper describes the outcome of a study on the impact of voluntariness on learning in a serious game. The results of 19 participants, randomly assigned to voluntary and mandatory gameplay, are analyzed to identify possible differences. The findings of this study suggest that, contrary to the opinion of many game designers, being required to play a serious game does not necessarily take the fun out of the game.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Michael, D., Chen, S.: Serious Games: Games That Educate, Train and Inform. Thomson, Boston (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wu, W., Hsiao, H., Wu, P., Lin, C., Huang, S.: Investigating the learning-theory foundations of game-based learning: a meta-analysis. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 28(3), 265–279 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wouters, P., Van Nimwegen, C., Van Oostendorp, H., Van Der Spek, E.: Meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. J. Educ. Psychol. 105(2), 249–265 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Heeter, C., Lee, Y., Magerko, B., Medler, B.: Impacts of forced serious game play on vulnerable subgroups. Int. J. Gaming Comput.-Mediated Simul. 3(3), 34–53 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mollick, E., Rothbard, N.: Mandatory fun: consent, gamification and the impact of games at work. The Wharton School Research Paper Series (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Susi, T., Johanneson, M., Backlund, P.: Serious games - an overview. Technical paper, University of Skövde, Skövde (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Djaouti, D., Alvarez, J., Jessel, J., Rampnoux, O.: Origins of serious games. In: Ma, M., Oikonomou, A., Jain, L. (eds.) Serious Games and Edutainment Applications, pp. 25–44. Springer, London (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Abt, C.: Serious Games. Viking Press, New York (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sawyer, B., Rajeski, D.: Serious Games: Improving Public Policy Through Game-Based Learning and Simulation. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Salen, K., Zimmerman, E.: Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. McGonigal, J.: Reality Is Broken. Penguin Press, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Huizinga, J.: Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play Element in Culture. Beacon Press, Boston (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Callois, R.: Man, Play and Games. University of Illinois Press, Champaign (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Garris, R., Ahlers, R., Driskell, J.: Games, motivation, and learning: a research and practice model. Simul. Gaming 33(4), 441–467 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Prensky, M.: Computer games and learning: digital game-based learning. In: Raessens, J., Goldstein, J. (eds.) Handbook of Computer Game Studies, pp. 97–122. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Breuer, J., Bente, G.: Why so serious? On the relation of serious games and learning. Eludamos J. Comput. Game Cult. 4(1), 7–24 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fulton, S., Schweitzer, D.: Impact of giving students a choice of homework assignments in an introductory computer science class. Int. J. Sch. Teach. Learn. 5(1), 20 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Becker, K.: How much choice is too much? INROADS 38(4), 78–82 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hernon, P., Whitman, J.R.: Delivering Satisfaction and Service Quality: A Customer-Based Approach for Libraries. American Library Association, Chicago (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Coelho, P., Esteves, S.: The choice between a five-point and a ten-point scale in the framework of customer satisfaction measurement. Int. J. Market Res. 49(3), 313–339 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esther Kuindersma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kuindersma, E., van der Pal, J., van den Herik, J., Plaat, A. (2016). Voluntary Play in Serious Games. In: De Gloria, A., Veltkamp, R. (eds) Games and Learning Alliance. GALA 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9599. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40216-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40216-1_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40215-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40216-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics