Skip to main content

A Semiotic-Conceptual Analysis of Conceptual Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Graph-Based Representation and Reasoning (ICCS 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9717))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

While learning mathematics or computer science, beginning students often encounter significant problems with abstract concepts. In both subjects there tend to be large numbers of students failing the class or dropping out during the first semesters. There is a substantial existing body of literature on this topic from a didactic perspective, but in our opinion an investigation from a semiotic-conceptual perspective could provide further insights and specifically analyse the difficulties encountered when learning abstract concepts. This means that both the complexities of the representations of abstract concepts and the conceptual content itself are modelled and investigated separately and in combination with each other. In our opinion a semiotic analysis of the representations is often missing from didactic theories. And in particular, as far as we know, there are not yet any formal mathematical approaches to modelling learning difficulties with respect to semiotic and conceptual structures. Semiotic-Conceptual Analysis (SCA) as presented in this paper aims to fill that niche.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Because Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) has been presented many times at this conference, this paper does not provide an introduction to FCA but there is an example with some explanation in Sect. 5. Further information about FCA can be found, for example, on-line (http://www.fcahome.org.uk) and in the main FCA textbook by Ganter and Wille (1999).

  2. 2.

    ‘Interpretation’ in SCA is an anonymous sign and refers to a function. ‘Having a different interpretation’ in SCA means using a different function. Different interpretations can still lead to the same denotation. This is different to how ‘interpretation’ is used in ordinary language.

  3. 3.

    A tolerance relation is symmetric and reflexive. An equivalence relation is also transitive.

  4. 4.

    A reader who is unfamiliar with FCA could read Sect. 5 first because it contains an example of a concept lattice.

References

  • Albert, D., Lukas, J. (eds.): Knowledge Spaces: Theories, Empirical Research, Applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, E., Mcdonald, M.A.: APOS: a constructivist theory of learning in undergraduate mathematics education research. In: Holton, D., Artigue, M., Kirchgräber, U., Hillel, J., Niss, M., Schoenfeld, A. (eds.) The Teaching and Learning of Mathematics at University Level. ICMI Study Series, vol. 7, pp. 275–282. Springer, Dordrecht (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Falmagne, J.-C., Albert, D., Doble, D., Eppstein, D., Hu, X.: Knowledge Spaces: Applications in Education. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ganter, B., Wille, R.: Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical Foundations. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goguen, J.: An introduction to algebraic semiotics, with application to user interface design. In: Nehaniv, C.L. (ed.) CMAA 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1562, pp. 242–291. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Prediger, S.: How to develop mathematics-for-teaching and for understanding: the case of meanings of the equal sign. J. Math. Teach. Educ. 13, 73–93 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priss, U.: Relational concept analysis: semantic structures in dictionaries and lexical databases. Ph.D. thesis, Verlag Shaker, Aachen (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Priss, U.: Signs and formal concepts. In: Eklund, P. (ed.) ICFCA 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2961, pp. 28–38. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Priss, U., Riegler, P., Jensen, N.: Using FCA for modelling conceptual difficulties in learning processes. In: Domenach, F., Ignatov, D., Poelmans, J. (eds.) Contributions to the 10th International Conference on Formal Concept Analysis (ICFCA 2012), pp. 161–173 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Priss, U.: An introduction to semiotic-conceptual analysis with formal concept analysis. In: Yahia, S., Konecny, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Concept Lattices and Their Applications, Clermont-Ferrand, pp. 135–146 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Priss, U. (2016). A Semiotic-Conceptual Analysis of Conceptual Learning. In: Haemmerlé, O., Stapleton, G., Faron Zucker, C. (eds) Graph-Based Representation and Reasoning. ICCS 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9717. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40985-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40985-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40984-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40985-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics