Skip to main content

Learning Through Videos: Are Disabled Students Using Good Note-Taking Strategies?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9758))

Abstract

The importance of note-taking in face to face teaching and learning situations is well understood in terms of successful outcomes for the majority of students. Outcomes from interactions with online learning and the use of videos as a way of revising has been less well researched, in particular with disabled students. This paper aims to introduce the notion that not all disabled students who could use technology to support note taking necessarily find it effective although they prefer to listen and watch videos. A small survey provides an indication that students may not necessarily be making the best use of their technologies or have access to alternative ways of viewing online learning materials. Where there are options to view videos using lecture capture systems; time constraints and the quality of the videos prove to be further barriers, rather than providing a successful outcome. Despite the possibility of multi-modal/multichannel approaches there also remains very little research on the subject in particular when using more recent Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). There are, however, indications that with the increased use of transcriptions and graphical tools, these options could offer good note-taking strategies as part of a more inclusive approach for all students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kiewra, K.A.: Investigating notetaking and review: a depth of processing alternative. Educ. Psychol. 20(1), 23–32 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boyle, J.R.: Note-taking and secondary students with learning disabilities: challenges and solutions. Learn. Disabil. Res. Pract. 27(2), 90–101 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Hanafin, J., Shevlin, M., Kenny, M., McNeela, E.: Including young people with disabilities: assessment challenges in higher education. High. Educ. 54, 435–448 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. O’Hara, S.: Improving Your Study Skills: Study Smart, Study Less. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Piolat, A., Olive, T., Kellogg, R.T.: Cognitive effort during note taking. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 19(3), 291–312 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kiewra, K.A., Benton, S.L.: The effects of higher-order review questions with feedback on achievement among learners who take notes or receive the instructor’s notes. Hum. Learn. J. Pract. Res. Appl. 4, 225–231 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Peverly, S.T., Ramaswamy, V., Brown, C., Sumowski, J., Alidoost, M., Garner, J.: What predicts skill in lecture note taking? J. Educ. Psychol. 99(1), 167 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kiewra, K.A., Benton, S.L.: The relationship between information-processing ability and notetaking. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 13(1), 33–44 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fisher, J.L., Harris, M.B.: Effect of note taking and review on recall. J. Educ. Psychol. 65(3), 321 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bui, D.C., Myerson, J., Hale, S.: Note-taking with computers: exploring alternative strategies for improved recall. J. Educ. Psychol. 105(2), 299 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bui, D.C., Myerson, J.: The role of working memory abilities in lecture note-taking. Learn. Individ. Differ. 33, 12–22 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mueller, P.A., Oppenheimer, D.M.: The pen is mightier than the keyboard advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychol. Sci. 25(6), 1159–1168 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson, L., Adams, S., Cummins, M.: NMC Horizon Report: 2013 Higher, Education edn. The New Media Consortium, Austin (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Auer, S., Khalili, A., Tarasowa, D.: Crowd-sourced Open Courseware Authoring with Slide Wiki. org iJET 8(1): 62–63 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Guo, P.J., Kim, J., Rubin, R.: How video production affects student engagement: an empirical study of MOOC videos. In: Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale Conference, pp. 41–50. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Draffan, E.A., James, A., Wald, M., Dickens, K.: MOOCs - the web science experience. In: Proceedings of the W3C Accessible e-Learning Symposium, December 2013 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Taplin, R.H., Kerr, R., Brown, A.M.: Opportunity costs associated with the provision of student services: a case study of web-based lecture technology. High. Educ. 68(1), 15–28 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Leadbeater, W., Shuttleworth, T., Couperthwaite, J., Nightingale, K.P.: Evaluating the use and impact of lecture recording in undergraduates: evidence for distinct approaches by different groups of students. Comput. Educ. 61, 185–192 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vajoczki, S., Watt, S., Fenton, N., Tarkowski, J., Voros, G., Vine, M.M.: Lecture capture: an effective tool for universal instructional design? Can. J. High. Educ. 44(2), 1–29 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Burgstahler, S.: Opening doors or slamming them shut? online learning practices and students with disabilities. Soc. Incl. 3(6) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dunn, K.G.: The challenges of launching a MOOC and reusing that material in a blended campus class. In: Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Leadbeater, W., Anderson, V., Onens, S., Nightingale, K.P.: Supplementary lecture recording. A stepping stone to inclusion? In: Presentation to the ADSHE Conference, June 2014 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Department for Business, Innovation and Skill: Disabled Students Allowances (DSAs) (2016). https://www.gov.uk/disabled-students-allowances-dsas/overview. Accessed Jan 2016

  24. Mayer, R.E., Moreno, R.: Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educ. Psychol. 38(1), 43–52 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wald, M.: Synote: accessible and assistive technology enhancing learning for all students. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W., Karshmer, A. (eds.) Computers Helping People with Special Needs. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6180, pp. 177–184. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abi James .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

James, A., Draffan, E.A., Wald, M. (2016). Learning Through Videos: Are Disabled Students Using Good Note-Taking Strategies?. In: Miesenberger, K., Bühler, C., Penaz, P. (eds) Computers Helping People with Special Needs. ICCHP 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9758. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41264-1_63

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41264-1_63

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41263-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41264-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics