Skip to main content

3D Total Variation Minimization Filter for Breast Tomosynthesis Imaging

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Breast Imaging (IWDM 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 9699))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to implement and evaluate the performance of a 3D Total Variation (TV) minimization filter for Poisson noise and apply it to 3D digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) data. The value of Lagrange multiplier (λ) to be used in filter equation has a direct relationship with the results obtained. Some preliminary studies about λ values were done.

A Mammographic Accreditation Phantom Model 156 was acquired and its biggest tumor-like mass and cluster of microcalcifications were used for image quality assessment. The proposed methodology was also tested with one clinical DBT data set.

For 3D filter performance analysis: a reduction of 41.08 % and 38.60 % in 3D TV was achieved when a constant or variable λ value is used over slices, respectively. Either for constant or variable λ, the artifact spread function was improved, when compared to the unfiltered data. For the in-plane analysis: when constant λ is used, a reduction of 37.02 % in TV, an increase of 47.72 % in contrast to noise ratio (CNR) and a deterioration of 0.15 % in spatial resolution were obtained. For a variable λ, a reduction of 37.12 % in TV, an increase of 42.66 % in CNR and an improvement of 18.85 % in spatial resolution were achieved. A visual inspection of unfiltered and filtered clinical images demonstrates the quantitative values achieved with the phantom, where areas with higher noise level become smoother while preserving edges and details of the structures (about 43 % of TV reduction).

Both quantitative and qualitative analysis performed in this study confirmed the relevance of this approach in improving image quality in DBT imaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Siegel, R.L., Miller, K.D., Jemal, A.: Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J. Clin. 65(1), 5–29 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (2011). http://www.fda.gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/MammographyQualityStandardsActandProgram/FacilityCertificationandInspection/ucm114148.htm. Accessed May 2015

  3. Sechopoulos, I.: A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part I. The image acquisition process. Med. Phys. 40(1), 014301 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brandt, K.R., et al.: Can digital breast tomosynthesis replace conventional diagnostic mammography views for screening recalls without calcifications? A comparison study in a simulated clinical setting. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 200(2), 291–298 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kopans, D.B.: Digital breast tomosynthesis from concept to clinical care. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 202(2), 299–308 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Timberg, P., et al.: Impact of dose on observer performance in breast tomosynthesis using breast specimens. In: Proceedings of SPIE 6913, Medical Imaging: Physics of Medical Imaging (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao, B., Zhao, W.: Three-dimensional linear system analysis for breast tomosynthesis. Med. Phys. 35(12), 5219–5232 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhao, B., et al.: Experimental validation of a three-dimensional linear system model for breast tomosynthesis. Med. Phys. 36(1), 240–251 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Das, M., et al.: Evaluation of a variable dose acquisition technique for microcalcification and mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis. Med. Phys. 36(6), 1976–1984 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Das, M., et al.: Penalized maximum likelihood reconstruction for improved microcalcification detection in breast tomosynthesis. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 30(4), 904–914 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ertas, M., et al.: An iterative tomosynthesis reconstruction using total variation combined with non-local means filtering. BioMed. Eng. OnLine 13(1), 65 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Feng, Y., et al.: Improved reconstruction of non-cartesian magnetic resonance imaging data through total variation minimization and POCS optimization. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2009, 2676–2679 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jonsson, E., Huang, S.-C., Chan, T.: Total variation regularization in positron emission tomography. Department of Mathematics. UCLA. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.35.4447

  14. Joshi, S.H., et al.: MRI resolution enhancement using total variation regularization. Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Biomed. Imaging 2009, 161–164 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nett, B., et al.: Tomosynthesis via total variation minimization reconstruction and prior image constrained compressed sensing (PICCS) on a C-arm system. Proc. Soc. Photo Opt. Instrum. Eng. 6913, nihpa92672 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sidky, E.Y., et al.: A constrained, total-variation minimization algorithm for low-intensity x-ray CT. Med. Phys. 38(S1), S117–S125 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhiqiang, C., et al.: A limited-angle CT reconstruction method based on anisotropic TV minimization. Phys. Med. Biol. 58(7), 2119 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rudin, L.I., Osher, S., Fatemi, E.: Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenom. 60(1–4), 259–268 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Le, T., Chartrand, R., Asaki, T.: A variational approach to reconstructing images corrupted by poisson noise. J. Math. Imaging Vis. 27(3), 257–263 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Velikina, J., Leng, S., Chen, G.-H.: Limited view angle tomographic image reconstruction via total variation minimization, In: Proceedings of the SPIE 6510, Medical Imaging 2007: Physics of Medical Imaging, 14 March 2007. doi:10.1117/12.713750

  21. Sawatzky, A., Brune, C., Müller, J., Burger, M.: Total variation processing of images with poisson statistics. In: Jiang, X., Petkov, N. (eds.) CAIP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5702, pp. 533–540. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Mota, A.M., et al.: Total variation minimization filter for DBT imaging. Med. Phys. 42(6), 2827–2836 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sidky, E.Y., et al.: Practical iterative image reconstruction in digital breast tomosynthesis by non-convex TpV optimization. In: Proceedings of the SPIE 6913, Medical Imaging 2008: Physics of Medical Imaging, 18 March 2008. doi:10.1117/12.772796

  24. Sidky, E.Y., et al.: Enhanced imaging of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis through improved image-reconstruction algorithms. Med. Phys. 36(11), 4920–4932 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ertas, M., et al.: Digital breast tomosynthesis image reconstruction using 2D and 3D total variation minimization. Biomed. Eng. Online 12, 112 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Seyyedi, S., Yildirim, I.: 3D digital breast tomosynthesis image reconstruction using anisotropic total variation minimization. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2014, 6052–6055 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wu, T., et al.: A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis. Med. Phys. 31(9), 2636–2647 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia - Portugal (projects Pest-OE/SAU/IU0645/2013, Pest-OE/SAU/IU0645/2014 and PTDC/BBB-IMG/3310/2012).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana M. Mota .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mota, A.M., Oliveira, N., Almeida, P., Matela, N. (2016). 3D Total Variation Minimization Filter for Breast Tomosynthesis Imaging. In: Tingberg, A., Lång, K., Timberg, P. (eds) Breast Imaging. IWDM 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9699. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41546-8_63

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41546-8_63

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41545-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41546-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics