Skip to main content

Finding Compositional Rules for Determining the Semantic Orientation of Phrases

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Processing of the Portuguese Language (PROPOR 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9727))

  • 588 Accesses

Abstract

The semantic compositionality principle states that the meaning of an expression can be determined by its parts and the way they are put together. Based on that principle, this paper presents a method for finding the set of compositional rules that best explain the positive, negative, and neutral semantic orientation (SO) of two-word phrases, in terms of the SO of its words. For instance, the phrase “fake contract” has a negative SO. A corpus was built for evaluating the proposed method and several experiences are reported. We also use the conditional probability as a reliability measure of the compositional rules. The reliability of the learned rules ranges from 60.44 % for verb-noun phrases to 100 % for adjective-adjective phrases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://github.com/i000313/phd.polarity.compositionalRules.

  2. 2.

    https://pt.wikinews.org/ - Wikinews in Portuguese.

  3. 3.

    http://opennlp.sourceforge.net/ - OpenNLP POS Tagger 1.5.2.

References

  1. Lehrer, A.: Semantic fields and lexical structure. North-holl. Linguist. Ser. 11, 225 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Turney, P.D.: Thumbs up or thumbs down?: semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 417–424. Association for Computational Linguistics, Morristown (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Moilanen, K., Pulman, S.: Sentiment composition. In: Proceedings of the Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing International Conference, pp. 378–382 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Socher, R., Huval, B., Manning, C.D., Ng, A.Y.: Semantic compositionality through recursive matrix-vector spaces. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, pp. 1201–1211 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., Hoffmann, P.: Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference and the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP), pp. 347–354 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Polanyi, L., Zaenen, A.: Contextual valence shifters. Comput. attitude Affect text Theory Appl. 20, 1–10 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Choi, Y., Cardie, C.: Learning with compositional semantics as structural inference for subsentential sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing - EMNLP 2008, p. 793. Association for Computational Linguistics, Morristown (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Taboada, M., Brooke, J., Tofiloski, M., Voll, K., Stede, M.: Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis. Comput. Linguist. 37, 267–307 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yessenalina, A., Cardie, C.: Compositional matrix-space models for sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 172–182 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Klenner, M., Petrakis, S., Fahrni, A.: Robust compositional polarity classification. In: Proceedings of the International Conference RANLP 2009, pp. 180–184 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shaikh, M.A.M., Prendinger, H., Mitsuru, I.: SenseNet: a linguistic tool to visualize numerical-valance based sentiment of textual data. In: Proceedings of ICON - 2007 5th International Conference on Natural Language Processing, pp. 147–152, Hyderabad, India (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Paulo-Santos, A., Ramos, C., Marques, N.C.: Determining the polarity of words through a common online dictionary. In: Antunes, L., Pinto, H. (eds.) EPIA 2011. LNCS, vol. 7026, pp. 649–663. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

António Paulo Santos is supported by the FCT grant SFRH/BD/47551/2008 and supported by Department of Informatics of FCT/Universidade de Lisboa.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to António Paulo Santos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Santos, A.P., Ramos, C., Marques, N. (2016). Finding Compositional Rules for Determining the Semantic Orientation of Phrases. In: Silva, J., Ribeiro, R., Quaresma, P., Adami, A., Branco, A. (eds) Computational Processing of the Portuguese Language. PROPOR 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9727. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41552-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41552-9_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41551-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41552-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics