Skip to main content

Extracting and Representing Higher Order Predicate Relations between Concepts

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Natural Language Processing and Information Systems (NLDB 2016)

Abstract

In a text, two concepts can hold either direct or higher order relationship where function of some concepts is considered as another concept. Essentially, we require a mechanism to capture complex associations between concepts. Keeping this in view, we propose a knowledge representation scheme which is flexible enough to capture any order of associations between concepts in factual as well as non-factual sentences. We utilize a five-tuple representation scheme to capture associations between concepts and based on our evaluation strategy we found that by this we are able to represent 90.7 % of the concept associations correctly. This is superior to existing pattern based methods. A use case in the domain of content retrieval has also been evaluated which has shown to retrieve more accurate content using our knowledge representation scheme thereby proving the effectiveness of our approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://deeplearning4j.org/word2vec.html.

  2. 2.

    http://www.thesaurus.com/.

  3. 3.

    ncert.nic.in/ncerts/textbook/textbook.htm.

References

  1. Johansson, R., Nugues, P.M.: Dependency-based syntactic-semantic analysis with PropBank and NomBank. In: Proceedings of CoNNL, pp. 183–187 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Meyers, A., Reeves, R., Macleod, C., Szekely, R., Zielinska, V., Young, B., Grishman, R.: The nombank project: an interim report. In: Meyers, A. (ed.) HLT-NAACL 2004 Workshop: Frontiers in Corpus Annotation, pp. 24–31. Association for Computational Linguistics, Boston, Massachusetts (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Palmer, M., Gildea, D., Kingsbury, P.: The proposition bank: an annotated corpus of semantic roles. Comput. Linguist. 31, 71–106 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Colton, S.: Knowledge representation (2007). http://tinyurl.com/gozhw5t. Accessed 21 Feb 2016

  5. Ali, A., Khan, M.A.: Selecting predicate logic for knowledge representation by comparative study of knowledge representation schemes. In: International Conference on Emerging Technologies, ICET 2009, pp. 23–28 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clark, P.: Knowledge representation in machine learning. Mach. Hum. Learn. 35–49 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brachman, R.J., Levesque, H.J., Reiter, R.: Knowledge Representation. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mylopoulos, J.: An overview of knowledge representation. SIGART Bull. 5–12 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Uschold, M., King, M.: Towards a methodology for building ontologies. Citeseer (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gmez-Prez, A., Fernndez-Lpez, M., de Vincente, A.: Towards a method to conceptualize domain ontologies. In: Proceedings of ECAI-1996 Workshop on Ontological Engineering (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Uschold, M.: Converting an informal ontology into ontolingua: some experiences. Technical report, University of Edinburgh Artificial Intelligence Applications Institute AIAI TR (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Uschold, M.: Building ontologies: towards a unified methodology. Technical report, University of Edinburgh Artificial Intelligence Applications Institute AIAI TR (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fernndez-Lpez, M., Gmez-Prez, A., Juristo, N.: Methontology: from ontological art towards ontological engineering. In: Proceedings of Symposium on Ontological Engineering of AAAI (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pease, A., Niles, I., Li, J.: The suggested upper merged ontology: a large ontology for the semantic web and its applications. In: Working Notes of the AAAI-2002 Workshop on Ontologies and the Semantic Web, vol. 28 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Olney, A.M., Cade, W.L., Williams, C.: Generating concept map exercises from textbooks. In: Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, IUNLPBEA 2011, pp. 111–119. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hearst, M.A.: Automatic acquisition of hyponyms from large text corpora. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING 1992, vol. 2, pp. 539–545. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fader, A., Soderland, S., Etzioni, O.: Identifying relations for open information extraction. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2011, pp. 1535–1545. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.H.: The weka data mining software: an update. ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 11, 10–18 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Speer, R., Havasi, C.: Representing general relational knowledge in conceptnet 5. In: Chair, N.C.C., Choukri, K., Declerck, T., Doan, M.U., Maegaard, B., Mariani, J., Moreno, A., Odijk, J., Piperidis, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the Eight International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2012). European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Istanbul (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Samsung R & D Institute India - Bangalore. We thank our colleagues Mr. Tripun Goel, Mr. Krishnamraju Murali Venkata Mutyala, Mr. Chandragouda Patil, Mr. Ramachandran Narasimhamurthy, Mr. Srinidhi Nirgunda Seshadri, Dr. Shankar M. Venkatesan for providing insight and expertise that greatly assisted the research. We thank them for comments to improve the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjay Chatterji .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chatterji, S., Varshney, N., Chanda, P.K., Mittal, V., Jagwani, B.B. (2016). Extracting and Representing Higher Order Predicate Relations between Concepts. In: Métais, E., Meziane, F., Saraee, M., Sugumaran, V., Vadera, S. (eds) Natural Language Processing and Information Systems. NLDB 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9612. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41754-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41754-7_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41753-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41754-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics