Skip to main content

Comparing Series Elasticity and Admittance Control for Haptic Rendering

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 2705 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9774))

Abstract

While feedback control can be used to cause a motorized device to render the dynamic behavior of a virtual environment, this capacity inevitably breaks down at high frequencies where the rendered impedance reverts to the impedance of the device hardware. This situation amounts to a disadvantage for admittance display, for which hardware impedance is high. Series elastic actuators offer an attractive alternative with lower impedance at high frequencies, though stability considerations impose limits on the stiffest virtual environment that may be rendered. In this paper we explore the tradeoffs between admittance control and series elastic actuation with the use of analytical comparisons in the frequency domain backed up by experiments and complemented with a passivity analysis that accounts for an excess of passivity contributed by human biomechanics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Immitance is a term that can be used to refer to the relationship between force and motion without specifying input and output, whereas admittance implies motion response to force and impedance implies force response to motion.

References

  1. Adams, R.J., Hannaford, B.: Stable haptic interaction with virtual environments. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 15(3), 465–474 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Adams, R.J., Hannaford, B.: Control law design for haptic interfaces to virtual reality. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 10, 3–13 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Colgate, E., Hogan, N.: An analysis of contact instability in terms of passive physical equivalents. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 404–409 vol.1, May 1989

    Google Scholar 

  4. Colgate, J.E., Hogan, N.: Robust control of dynamically interacting systems. Int. J. Control 48(1), 65–88 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Gillespie, R.B., Kim, D., Suchosk, J.M., Bo, Y., Brown, J.D.: Series elastic for free free-space motion for free. In: IEEE Haptic Symposium, pp. 609–615 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hogan, N.: Controlling impedance at the man/machine interface. In: International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 1626–1631 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mussa-Ivaldi, F.A., Hogan, N., Bizzi, E.: Neural, mechanical, and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans. Neuroscience 5, 2732–2743 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pratt, G.A., Williamson, M.M.: Series elastic actuators. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots, vol. 1, pp. 399–406 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pratt, J., Krupp, B., Morse, C.: Series elastic actuators for high fidelity force control. Ind. Robot Int. J. 29(3), 234–241 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Robinson, D.W.: Design and analysis of series elasticity in closed-loop actuator force control. Ph.D. thesis (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sergi, F., O’Malley, M.K.: On the stability and accuracy of high stiffness rendering in non-backdrivable actuators through series elasticity. Mechtronics 26, 54–75 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tan, H.Z., et al.: Human factors for the design of force-reflecting haptic interfaces. Dyn. Syst. Control 55(1), 353–359 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vallery, H., Veneman, J., van Asseldonk, E., Ekkelenkamp, R., Buss, M., van Der Kooij, H.: Compliant actuation of rehabilitation robots. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 15(3), 60–69 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vanderborght, B., Albu-Schaeffer, A., et al.: Variable impedance actuators: a review. Robot. Auton. Syst. 61(12), 1601–1614 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by NIH grant R01-EB019834 and NSF grant DGE 1256260.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emma Treadway .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Horibe, T., Treadway, E., Gillespie, R.B. (2016). Comparing Series Elasticity and Admittance Control for Haptic Rendering. In: Bello, F., Kajimoto, H., Visell, Y. (eds) Haptics: Perception, Devices, Control, and Applications. EuroHaptics 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9774. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42321-0_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42321-0_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42320-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42321-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics