Skip to main content

Job Construals – Conceptualizing and Measuring Process Participants’ Perception of Process Embeddedness

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 256))

Abstract

Business Process Standardization (BPS) is an important instrument to enhance an organizations’ competitiveness. A crucial element to achieve BPS is the change-supportive attitude by the affected employees. Previous studies have drawn attention on various determinants of attitude such as the employee’s motivation and culture but also on the broader process and work environment and on an employee’s perception of the embeddedness of their tasks. In this paper, we draw on the latter and on the theoretical concepts of self-construal and task interdependence to develop a theoretical concept named ‘job construals’. To measure the construct, we develop a valid measurement scale. Therefore, we use a card sorting approach with BPM experts to assess the validity of the measure. The contribution of our work lies in understanding the drivers of BPS acceptance and consequently the successful implementation of process standardization initiatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brucker-Kley, E., Kykalová, D., Pedron, C., Luternauer, T., Keller, T.: Business Process Management 2014 - Status quo und Perspektiven eines ganzheitlichen Geschäftsprozessmanagements (Business Process Management 2014 - Status quo and perspectives for comprehensive Business Process Management). vdf Hochschulverl, Zürich (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kettenbohrer, J., Eckhardt, A., Beimborn, D.: A theoretical perspective on meaningfulness of work and the success of business process standardization initiatives. In: 12th Internationale Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik, Osnabrück, Germany (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tenner, A.R., deToro, I.J.: Process Redesign: The Implementation Guide for Managers. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tumbas, S., Schmiedel, T.: Developing an organizational culture supportive of business process management. In: 11th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, Leipzig, Germany (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schmiedel, T., vom Brocke, J., Recker, J.: Which cultural values matter to business process management? Bus. Process Manag. J. 19, 292–317 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. vom Brocke, J., Schmiedel, T., Recker, J., Trkman, P., Mertens, W., Viaene, S.: Ten principles of good business process management. Bus. Process Manag. J. 20, 530–548 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Markus, H.R., Kitayama, S.: Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol. Rev. 98, 224–253 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Triandis, H.C.: The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychol. Rev. 96, 506–520 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shweder, R.A., Bourne, E.J.: Does the concept of the person vary cross-culturally? In: Shweder, R.A., LeVine, R.A. (eds.) Culture Theory: Essays on Mind, Self, and Emotion, pp. 158–199. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cross, S.E., Bacon, P.L., Morris, M.L.: The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 78, 791–808 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K.: The theory of purposeful work behavior. The role of personality, higher-order goals, and job characteristics. Acad. Manag. Rev. 38, 132–153 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Blaine, B., Crocker, J.: Self-esteem and self-serving biases in reactions to positive and negative events: an integrative review. In: Baumeister, R.F. (ed.) Self-esteem: The Puzzle of Low Self-Regard, pp. 55–85. Plenum Press, New York (1993)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Saavedra, R.P., Earley, P.C., van Dyne, L.: Complex interdepedence in task-performing groups. J. Appl. Psychol. 78, 61–72 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Langfred, C.W.: Autonomy and performance in teams: the multilevel moderating effect of task interdependence. J. Manag. 31, 513–529 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hackman, J.R., Oldham, G.R.: Development of the job diagnostic survey. J. Appl. Psychol. 60, 159–170 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kiggundu, M.N.: Task interdependence and the theory of job design. Acad. Manag. Rev. 6, 499–508 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Thomas, E.J.: Effects of facilitative role interdependence on group functioning. Hum. Relat. 10, 347–366 (1957)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Turner, A.N., Lawrence, P.R.: Individual jobs and the worker. Harvard University, Graduate School of Business Administration, Boston (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Münstermann, B., Eckhardt, A., Weitzel, T.: The performance impact of business process standardization: an empirical evaluation of the recruitment process. Bus. Process Manag. J. 16, 29–56 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Borgen, W.A., Butterfield, L.D., Amundson, N.E.: The experience of change and its impact on workers who self-identify as doing well with change that affects their work. J. Employ. Couns. 47, 2–11 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hammer, M.: What is business process management? In: vom Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds.) Handbook of Business Process Management 1, pp. 3–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. McCormack, K.: Business Process Maturity: Theory and Application. BookSurge Publishing, Charleston (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Škrinjar, R., Trkman, P.: Increasing process orientation with business process management: critical practices’. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 33, 48–60 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pritchard, J., Armistead, C.: Business process management - lessons from european business. Bus. Process Manag. J. 5, 10–35 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Indulska, M., Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Green, P.: Business process modelling: current issuses and future challenge. In: Hutchison, D.E.A. (ed.) Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pp. 501–514. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Kohlbacher, M., Gruenwald, S.: Process orientation: conceptualization and measurement. Bus. Process Manag. J. 17, 267–283 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kahn, R.L., Wolfe, D.M., Quinn, R.P., Snoek, J.D., Rosenthal, R.A.: Organizational Stress: Studies in Conflict and Ambiguity. Wiley, New York (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lawler, E.E., Porter, L.W., Tannenbaum, A.: Managers’ attitudes towards interaction episodes. J. Appl. Psychol. 52, 432–439 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kiggundu, M.N., Cook, W.: Testing for the double moderating effects of growth need strength in the Hackman-Oldham theory of job design. In: Alutto, J.A., Wahba, M.A. (eds.) Management and Organizations: Current perspectives (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Thompson, J.D.: Organizations in Action. McGraw-Hill, New York (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Trist, E.L., Bamforth, K.W.: Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal getting. Hum. Relat. 4, 3–38 (1951)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Byrd, T.A., Turner, D.E.: Measuring the flexibility of information technology infrastructure: exploratory analysis of a construct. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 17, 167–208 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lewis, B.R., Snyder, C.A., Rainer, R.K.J.: An empirical assessment of the information resource management construct. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 12, 199–223 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Churchill, G.A.: A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. J. Mark. Res. 16, 64–73 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Moore, G., Benbasat, I.: Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology information. Inf. Syst. Res. 2, 192–222 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cross, S.E.: Self-construals, coping, and stress in cross-cultural adaptation. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 26, 673–697 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jenkins, G.D.J., Lawler III, E.E., Nadler, D.A., Cammann, C.: Standardized observations: an approach to measuring the nature of of jobs. J. Appl. Psychol. 60, 171–181 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Singelis, T.M., Sharkley, W.F.: Culture, self-construal, and embrrassabality. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 26, 622–644 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Aiken, M., Hage, J.: Organizational interdependence and intra-organizational structure. Am. Sociol. Rev. 33, 912–930 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Billings, R.S., Klimoski, R.J., Breaugh, J.A.: The impact of a change in technology on job characteristics. Adm. Sci. Q. 22, 318–339 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lynch, B.P.: An empirical assessment of perrow’s technology construct. Adm. Sci. Q. 19, 338–356 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mohr, L.B.: Organization technology and organization structure. Adm. Sci. Q. 16, 444–459 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Overton, P., Schneck, R.E., Hazlett, C.B.: An empirical study of the technology of nursing units. Adm. Sci. Q. 22, 203–219 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Morgeson, F.P., Humphrey, S.E.: The work design questionnaire (WDQ): developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. J. Appl. Psychol. 91, 1321–1339 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hackman, J.R., Oldham, G.R.: Motivation through the degin of work. test of a theory. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 16, 250–279 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Anderson, J.C., Gerbing, D.W.: Predicting the performance of measures in a confirmatory factor analysis with a pretest assessment of their substantive validities. J. Appl. Psychol. 76, 732–740 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kiggundu, M.N.: Task interdependence and job design: test of a theory. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 31, 145–172 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janina Kettenbohrer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kettenbohrer, J., Beimborn, D., Siebert, I. (2016). Job Construals – Conceptualizing and Measuring Process Participants’ Perception of Process Embeddedness. In: Reichert, M., Reijers, H. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2016. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 256. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42887-1_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42887-1_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42886-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42887-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics