Abstract
Business Process Standardization (BPS) is an important instrument to enhance an organizations’ competitiveness. A crucial element to achieve BPS is the change-supportive attitude by the affected employees. Previous studies have drawn attention on various determinants of attitude such as the employee’s motivation and culture but also on the broader process and work environment and on an employee’s perception of the embeddedness of their tasks. In this paper, we draw on the latter and on the theoretical concepts of self-construal and task interdependence to develop a theoretical concept named ‘job construals’. To measure the construct, we develop a valid measurement scale. Therefore, we use a card sorting approach with BPM experts to assess the validity of the measure. The contribution of our work lies in understanding the drivers of BPS acceptance and consequently the successful implementation of process standardization initiatives.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Brucker-Kley, E., Kykalová, D., Pedron, C., Luternauer, T., Keller, T.: Business Process Management 2014 - Status quo und Perspektiven eines ganzheitlichen Geschäftsprozessmanagements (Business Process Management 2014 - Status quo and perspectives for comprehensive Business Process Management). vdf Hochschulverl, Zürich (2014)
Kettenbohrer, J., Eckhardt, A., Beimborn, D.: A theoretical perspective on meaningfulness of work and the success of business process standardization initiatives. In: 12th Internationale Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik, Osnabrück, Germany (2015)
Tenner, A.R., deToro, I.J.: Process Redesign: The Implementation Guide for Managers. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (2000)
Tumbas, S., Schmiedel, T.: Developing an organizational culture supportive of business process management. In: 11th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, Leipzig, Germany (2013)
Schmiedel, T., vom Brocke, J., Recker, J.: Which cultural values matter to business process management? Bus. Process Manag. J. 19, 292–317 (2013)
vom Brocke, J., Schmiedel, T., Recker, J., Trkman, P., Mertens, W., Viaene, S.: Ten principles of good business process management. Bus. Process Manag. J. 20, 530–548 (2014)
Markus, H.R., Kitayama, S.: Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol. Rev. 98, 224–253 (1991)
Triandis, H.C.: The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychol. Rev. 96, 506–520 (1989)
Shweder, R.A., Bourne, E.J.: Does the concept of the person vary cross-culturally? In: Shweder, R.A., LeVine, R.A. (eds.) Culture Theory: Essays on Mind, Self, and Emotion, pp. 158–199. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1984)
Cross, S.E., Bacon, P.L., Morris, M.L.: The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 78, 791–808 (2000)
Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K.: The theory of purposeful work behavior. The role of personality, higher-order goals, and job characteristics. Acad. Manag. Rev. 38, 132–153 (2013)
Blaine, B., Crocker, J.: Self-esteem and self-serving biases in reactions to positive and negative events: an integrative review. In: Baumeister, R.F. (ed.) Self-esteem: The Puzzle of Low Self-Regard, pp. 55–85. Plenum Press, New York (1993)
Saavedra, R.P., Earley, P.C., van Dyne, L.: Complex interdepedence in task-performing groups. J. Appl. Psychol. 78, 61–72 (1993)
Langfred, C.W.: Autonomy and performance in teams: the multilevel moderating effect of task interdependence. J. Manag. 31, 513–529 (2005)
Hackman, J.R., Oldham, G.R.: Development of the job diagnostic survey. J. Appl. Psychol. 60, 159–170 (1975)
Kiggundu, M.N.: Task interdependence and the theory of job design. Acad. Manag. Rev. 6, 499–508 (1981)
Thomas, E.J.: Effects of facilitative role interdependence on group functioning. Hum. Relat. 10, 347–366 (1957)
Turner, A.N., Lawrence, P.R.: Individual jobs and the worker. Harvard University, Graduate School of Business Administration, Boston (1965)
Münstermann, B., Eckhardt, A., Weitzel, T.: The performance impact of business process standardization: an empirical evaluation of the recruitment process. Bus. Process Manag. J. 16, 29–56 (2010)
Borgen, W.A., Butterfield, L.D., Amundson, N.E.: The experience of change and its impact on workers who self-identify as doing well with change that affects their work. J. Employ. Couns. 47, 2–11 (2010)
Hammer, M.: What is business process management? In: vom Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds.) Handbook of Business Process Management 1, pp. 3–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
McCormack, K.: Business Process Maturity: Theory and Application. BookSurge Publishing, Charleston (2007)
Škrinjar, R., Trkman, P.: Increasing process orientation with business process management: critical practices’. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 33, 48–60 (2013)
Pritchard, J., Armistead, C.: Business process management - lessons from european business. Bus. Process Manag. J. 5, 10–35 (1999)
Indulska, M., Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Green, P.: Business process modelling: current issuses and future challenge. In: Hutchison, D.E.A. (ed.) Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pp. 501–514. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Kohlbacher, M., Gruenwald, S.: Process orientation: conceptualization and measurement. Bus. Process Manag. J. 17, 267–283 (2011)
Kahn, R.L., Wolfe, D.M., Quinn, R.P., Snoek, J.D., Rosenthal, R.A.: Organizational Stress: Studies in Conflict and Ambiguity. Wiley, New York (1964)
Lawler, E.E., Porter, L.W., Tannenbaum, A.: Managers’ attitudes towards interaction episodes. J. Appl. Psychol. 52, 432–439 (1968)
Kiggundu, M.N., Cook, W.: Testing for the double moderating effects of growth need strength in the Hackman-Oldham theory of job design. In: Alutto, J.A., Wahba, M.A. (eds.) Management and Organizations: Current perspectives (1978)
Thompson, J.D.: Organizations in Action. McGraw-Hill, New York (1967)
Trist, E.L., Bamforth, K.W.: Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal getting. Hum. Relat. 4, 3–38 (1951)
Byrd, T.A., Turner, D.E.: Measuring the flexibility of information technology infrastructure: exploratory analysis of a construct. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 17, 167–208 (2000)
Lewis, B.R., Snyder, C.A., Rainer, R.K.J.: An empirical assessment of the information resource management construct. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 12, 199–223 (1995)
Churchill, G.A.: A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. J. Mark. Res. 16, 64–73 (1979)
Moore, G., Benbasat, I.: Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology information. Inf. Syst. Res. 2, 192–222 (1991)
Cross, S.E.: Self-construals, coping, and stress in cross-cultural adaptation. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 26, 673–697 (1995)
Jenkins, G.D.J., Lawler III, E.E., Nadler, D.A., Cammann, C.: Standardized observations: an approach to measuring the nature of of jobs. J. Appl. Psychol. 60, 171–181 (1975)
Singelis, T.M., Sharkley, W.F.: Culture, self-construal, and embrrassabality. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 26, 622–644 (1995)
Aiken, M., Hage, J.: Organizational interdependence and intra-organizational structure. Am. Sociol. Rev. 33, 912–930 (1968)
Billings, R.S., Klimoski, R.J., Breaugh, J.A.: The impact of a change in technology on job characteristics. Adm. Sci. Q. 22, 318–339 (1977)
Lynch, B.P.: An empirical assessment of perrow’s technology construct. Adm. Sci. Q. 19, 338–356 (1974)
Mohr, L.B.: Organization technology and organization structure. Adm. Sci. Q. 16, 444–459 (1971)
Overton, P., Schneck, R.E., Hazlett, C.B.: An empirical study of the technology of nursing units. Adm. Sci. Q. 22, 203–219 (1977)
Morgeson, F.P., Humphrey, S.E.: The work design questionnaire (WDQ): developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. J. Appl. Psychol. 91, 1321–1339 (2006)
Hackman, J.R., Oldham, G.R.: Motivation through the degin of work. test of a theory. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 16, 250–279 (1976)
Anderson, J.C., Gerbing, D.W.: Predicting the performance of measures in a confirmatory factor analysis with a pretest assessment of their substantive validities. J. Appl. Psychol. 76, 732–740 (1991)
Kiggundu, M.N.: Task interdependence and job design: test of a theory. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 31, 145–172 (1983)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kettenbohrer, J., Beimborn, D., Siebert, I. (2016). Job Construals – Conceptualizing and Measuring Process Participants’ Perception of Process Embeddedness. In: Reichert, M., Reijers, H. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2016. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 256. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42887-1_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42887-1_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42886-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42887-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)